3.2 sec in total
1 sec
2 sec
236 ms
Visit bibleman.com now to see the best up-to-date Bibleman content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about bibleman.com
Visit bibleman.comWe analyzed Bibleman.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1 sec and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
bibleman.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.6 s
32/100
10%
Value4.7 s
33/100
25%
Value7.0 s
32/100
10%
Value500 ms
58/100
30%
Value0.074
95/100
15%
Value10.5 s
23/100
10%
1007 ms
43 ms
90 ms
159 ms
98 ms
Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 49% of them (26 requests) were addressed to the original Bibleman.com, 45% (24 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Player.vimeo.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Bibleman.com.
Page size can be reduced by 280.8 kB (17%)
1.6 MB
1.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Bibleman.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 895.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 121.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 121.0 kB or 89% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 41.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Bibleman images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 66.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 66.0 kB or 17% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 52.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bibleman.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 52.0 kB or 24% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (57%)
28
12
The browser has sent 28 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bibleman. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
bibleman.com
1007 ms
style.min.css
43 ms
84q2k.css
90 ms
js_composer.min.css
159 ms
84q2k.css
98 ms
shortcodes-styles.min.css
183 ms
960622553
409 ms
84q2k.css
103 ms
84q2k.js
118 ms
jquery.min.js
180 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
133 ms
rbtools.min.js
241 ms
rs6.min.js
242 ms
84q2k.js
232 ms
84q2k.js
242 ms
84q2k.js
245 ms
84q2k.js
241 ms
shortcodes-scripts.min.js
400 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
242 ms
logo.png
405 ms
shop-dvds-h.jpg
404 ms
shop-toys-h.jpg
405 ms
pureflix.png
404 ms
minno.png
403 ms
biblemanclassics-vimeo-1.jpg
584 ms
css
191 ms
bibleman-sky-2-background.jpg
302 ms
dark-purple-background-large.jpg
303 ms
1873189728-d1a3f87be5e785fe971acb1c33db26e9cf1575f340ebabffb80faba820a23583-d
308 ms
KFOOCniXp96a4Tc2DaTeuDAoKsE617JFc49knOIYdjTYkqUcKWmT.ttf
122 ms
KFOOCniXp96a4Tc2DaTeuDAoKsE617JFc49knOIYdjTYoKUcKWmT.ttf
121 ms
KFOOCniXp96a4Tc2DaTeuDAoKsE617JFc49knOIYdjTYzKUcKWmT.ttf
121 ms
KFOOCniXp96a4Tc2DaTeuDAoKsE617JFc49knOIYdjTYEqUcKWmT.ttf
101 ms
KFOOCniXp96a4Tc2DaTeuDAoKsE617JFc49knOIYdjTYkqQcKWmT.ttf
122 ms
KFOOCniXp96a4Tc2DaTeuDAoKsE617JFc49knOIYdjTYTKIcKWmT.ttf
120 ms
KFOOCniXp96a4Tc2DaTeuDAoKsE617JFc49knOIYdjTYdaIcKWmT.ttf
123 ms
KFOOCniXp96a4Tc2DaTeuDAoKsE617JFc49knOIYdjTYEqIcKWmT.ttf
125 ms
KFOOCniXp96a4Tc2DaTeuDAoKsE617JFc49knOIYdjTYO6IcKWmT.ttf
126 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1y9osUZiYA.ttf
122 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1xZosUZiYA.ttf
125 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs18NvsUZiYA.ttf
122 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1_FvsUZiYA.ttf
126 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs169vsUZiYA.ttf
127 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs13FvsUZiYA.ttf
127 ms
KFOMCniXp96ayz4E7kSn66aGLdTylUAMQXC89YmC2DPNWubEbFmUiA8.ttf
129 ms
KFOMCniXp96ayz4E7kSn66aGLdTylUAMQXC89YmC2DPNWuZEbVmUiA8.ttf
127 ms
KFOMCniXp96ayz4E7kSn66aGLdTylUAMQXC89YmC2DPNWuaabVmUiA8.ttf
126 ms
KFOMCniXp96ayz4E7kSn66aGLdTylUAMQXC89YmC2DPNWubEbVmUiA8.ttf
125 ms
KFOMCniXp96ayz4E7kSn66aGLdTylUAMQXC89YmC2DPNWub2bVmUiA8.ttf
127 ms
KFOMCniXp96ayz4E7kSn66aGLdTylUAMQXC89YmC2DPNWuYaalmUiA8.ttf
126 ms
KFOMCniXp96ayz4E7kSn66aGLdTylUAMQXC89YmC2DPNWuYjalmUiA8.ttf
128 ms
KFOMCniXp96ayz4E7kSn66aGLdTylUAMQXC89YmC2DPNWuZEalmUiA8.ttf
129 ms
KFOMCniXp96ayz4E7kSn66aGLdTylUAMQXC89YmC2DPNWuZtalmUiA8.ttf
128 ms
bibleman.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
bibleman.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
bibleman.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
robots.txt is not valid
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bibleman.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Bibleman.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
bibleman.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Bibleman. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: