681 ms in total
110 ms
386 ms
185 ms
Click here to check amazing Bible Selector content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about bibleselector.com
Guide to selecting the right bible version for your needs.
Visit bibleselector.comWe analyzed Bibleselector.com page load time and found that the first response time was 110 ms and then it took 571 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.
bibleselector.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.3 s
98/100
10%
Value1.4 s
100/100
25%
Value1.3 s
100/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value1.3 s
100/100
10%
110 ms
43 ms
64 ms
66 ms
41 ms
Our browser made a total of 9 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (7 requests) were addressed to the original Bibleselector.com, 22% (2 requests) were made to W3.org. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (157 ms) relates to the external source W3.org.
Page size can be reduced by 10.7 kB (57%)
18.8 kB
8.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Bibleselector.com main page is 18.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 12.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 4.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 916 B, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 4.3 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 189 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 189 B or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 6.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bibleselector.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 6.2 kB or 51% of the original size.
We found no issues to fix!
8
8
The browser has sent 8 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bible Selector. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.
bibleselector.com
110 ms
blusteel.css
43 ms
bs.css
64 ms
email.js
66 ms
base.css
41 ms
bg_wcag.gif
46 ms
cwp4032.gif
36 ms
valid-xhtml11-blue.gif
157 ms
valid-css2-blue.gif
143 ms
bibleselector.com accessibility score
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
bibleselector.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
bibleselector.com SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bibleselector.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Bibleselector.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
bibleselector.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Bible Selector. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: