Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 33

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 18% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 75

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

bibliata.com

Bulgarian Bible Online

Page Load Speed

5 sec in total

First Response

166 ms

Resources Loaded

4.7 sec

Page Rendered

167 ms

bibliata.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Bibliata content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about bibliata.com

Bulgarian Bible Online

Visit bibliata.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Bibliata.com page load time and found that the first response time was 166 ms and then it took 4.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

bibliata.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

bibliata.com

166 ms

bible

310 ms

168 ms

styles_bible.css

156 ms

header.php

338 ms

Our browser made a total of 51 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Bibliata.com, 67% (34 requests) were made to Bible.netbg.com and 10% (5 requests) were made to Wms-na.amazon-adsystem.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.3 sec) relates to the external source Bible.netbg.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 162.0 kB (51%)

Content Size

317.8 kB

After Optimization

155.8 kB

In fact, the total size of Bibliata.com main page is 317.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 228.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-44%

Potential reduce by 193 B

  • Original 439 B
  • After minification 393 B
  • After compression 246 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 193 B or 44% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 7.8 kB

  • Original 73.3 kB
  • After minification 65.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Bibliata needs image optimization as it can save up to 7.8 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-62%

Potential reduce by 140.7 kB

  • Original 228.6 kB
  • After minification 171.6 kB
  • After compression 87.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 140.7 kB or 62% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 13.4 kB

  • Original 15.4 kB
  • After minification 10.8 kB
  • After compression 2.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bibliata.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 13.4 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (58%)

Requests Now

48

After Optimization

20

The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bibliata. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

bibliata.com accessibility score

33

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

bibliata.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

bibliata.com SEO score

75

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bibliata.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Bibliata.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Bibliata. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: