Tools & Wizards About Us
bicortechnologies.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 7

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    22% of other websites

  • 80

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 49% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

bicortechnologies.com

Best Packaging Solutions | Modular Labeling and Stretch Wrapping

Page Load Speed

4.3 sec in total

First Response

912 ms

Resources Loaded

2.9 sec

Page Rendered

448 ms

bicortechnologies.com screenshot

About Website

Visit bicortechnologies.com now to see the best up-to-date Bicortechnologies content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about bicortechnologies.com

Bicor Technologies is a Company dedicated in providing process, packaging Labeling Equipment Solutions, Manufacturers Packaging Equipment, Net Weight Fillers and Accumulation Systems in CA USA.

Visit bicortechnologies.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Bicortechnologies.com page load time and found that the first response time was 912 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

bicortechnologies.com performance score

7

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.0 s

4/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value15.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value25.7 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,600 ms

12/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.465

19/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value23.0 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

bicortechnologies.com

912 ms

css

54 ms

style.min.css

79 ms

wc-blocks-vendors-style.css

111 ms

wc-blocks-style.css

162 ms

Our browser made a total of 126 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (105 requests) were addressed to the original Bicortechnologies.com, 7% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (4 requests) were made to . The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (912 ms) belongs to the original domain Bicortechnologies.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 136.5 kB (9%)

Content Size

1.5 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Bicortechnologies.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 606.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 77.8 kB

  • Original 93.3 kB
  • After minification 91.3 kB
  • After compression 15.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 77.8 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 44.3 kB

  • Original 606.0 kB
  • After minification 561.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Bicortechnologies images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 7.2 kB

  • Original 575.7 kB
  • After minification 575.4 kB
  • After compression 568.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 7.2 kB

  • Original 204.3 kB
  • After minification 203.9 kB
  • After compression 197.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bicortechnologies.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 99 (92%)

Requests Now

108

After Optimization

9

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 108 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bicortechnologies. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 77 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 24 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

bicortechnologies.com

bicortechnologies.com

912 ms

css

css

54 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

79 ms

wc-blocks-vendors-style.css

wc-blocks-vendors-style.css

111 ms

wc-blocks-style.css

wc-blocks-style.css

162 ms

styles.css

styles.css

154 ms

intlTelInput.min.css

intlTelInput.min.css

156 ms

countrySelect.min.css

countrySelect.min.css

158 ms

settings.css

settings.css

169 ms

style.css

style.css

207 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

211 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

213 ms

style.css

style.css

217 ms

dripicons.css

dripicons.css

215 ms

stylesheet.min.css

stylesheet.min.css

283 ms

woocommerce.min.css

woocommerce.min.css

267 ms

woocommerce_responsive.min.css

woocommerce_responsive.min.css

276 ms

print.css

print.css

265 ms

webkit_stylesheet.css

webkit_stylesheet.css

264 ms

style_dynamic.css

style_dynamic.css

277 ms

responsive.min.css

responsive.min.css

325 ms

style_dynamic_responsive.css

style_dynamic_responsive.css

323 ms

7 ms

custom_css.css

custom_css.css

323 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

331 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

44 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

343 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

356 ms

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

381 ms

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

375 ms

jquery.blockUI.min.js

jquery.blockUI.min.js

400 ms

add-to-cart.min.js

add-to-cart.min.js

379 ms

6 ms

snippet.js

snippet.js

76 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

404 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

404 ms

index.js

index.js

485 ms

intlTelInput.min.js

intlTelInput.min.js

485 ms

countrySelect.min.js

countrySelect.min.js

488 ms

21202368.js

21202368.js

95 ms

js.cookie.min.js

js.cookie.min.js

485 ms

6 ms

js

js

174 ms

5 ms

woocommerce.min.js

woocommerce.min.js

485 ms

cart-fragments.min.js

cart-fragments.min.js

415 ms

qode-like.min.js

qode-like.min.js

422 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

375 ms

accordion.min.js

accordion.min.js

373 ms

menu.min.js

menu.min.js

479 ms

dom-ready.min.js

dom-ready.min.js

470 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

467 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

470 ms

a11y.min.js

a11y.min.js

435 ms

autocomplete.min.js

autocomplete.min.js

427 ms

controlgroup.min.js

controlgroup.min.js

491 ms

checkboxradio.min.js

checkboxradio.min.js

493 ms

button.min.js

button.min.js

488 ms

datepicker.min.js

datepicker.min.js

444 ms

mouse.min.js

mouse.min.js

439 ms

resizable.min.js

resizable.min.js

431 ms

draggable.min.js

draggable.min.js

463 ms

dialog.min.js

dialog.min.js

462 ms

droppable.min.js

droppable.min.js

430 ms

progressbar.min.js

progressbar.min.js

430 ms

selectable.min.js

selectable.min.js

431 ms

sortable.min.js

sortable.min.js

424 ms

slider.min.js

slider.min.js

454 ms

spinner.min.js

spinner.min.js

437 ms

tooltip.min.js

tooltip.min.js

435 ms

tabs.min.js

tabs.min.js

435 ms

effect.min.js

effect.min.js

430 ms

effect-blind.min.js

effect-blind.min.js

412 ms

effect-bounce.min.js

effect-bounce.min.js

448 ms

effect-clip.min.js

effect-clip.min.js

481 ms

ga.js

ga.js

81 ms

effect-drop.min.js

effect-drop.min.js

443 ms

7cH1v4okm5zmbvwkAx_sfcEuiD8jvvKsN9C6.ttf

7cH1v4okm5zmbvwkAx_sfcEuiD8jvvKsN9C6.ttf

91 ms

7cH1v4okm5zmbvwkAx_sfcEuiD8jjPKsN9C6.ttf

7cH1v4okm5zmbvwkAx_sfcEuiD8jjPKsN9C6.ttf

91 ms

7cH1v4okm5zmbvwkAx_sfcEuiD8j4PKsN9C6.ttf

7cH1v4okm5zmbvwkAx_sfcEuiD8j4PKsN9C6.ttf

202 ms

7cH1v4okm5zmbvwkAx_sfcEuiD8jPvKsN9C6.ttf

7cH1v4okm5zmbvwkAx_sfcEuiD8jPvKsN9C6.ttf

203 ms

7cH1v4okm5zmbvwkAx_sfcEuiD8jvvOsN9C6.ttf

7cH1v4okm5zmbvwkAx_sfcEuiD8jvvOsN9C6.ttf

203 ms

7cH1v4okm5zmbvwkAx_sfcEuiD8jYPWsN9C6.ttf

7cH1v4okm5zmbvwkAx_sfcEuiD8jYPWsN9C6.ttf

202 ms

7cH1v4okm5zmbvwkAx_sfcEuiD8jWfWsN9C6.ttf

7cH1v4okm5zmbvwkAx_sfcEuiD8jWfWsN9C6.ttf

203 ms

7cH1v4okm5zmbvwkAx_sfcEuiD8jPvWsN9C6.ttf

7cH1v4okm5zmbvwkAx_sfcEuiD8jPvWsN9C6.ttf

204 ms

7cH1v4okm5zmbvwkAx_sfcEuiD8jF_WsN9C6.ttf

7cH1v4okm5zmbvwkAx_sfcEuiD8jF_WsN9C6.ttf

235 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

83 ms

effect-explode.min.js

effect-explode.min.js

369 ms

effect-fade.min.js

effect-fade.min.js

369 ms

effect-fold.min.js

effect-fold.min.js

399 ms

effect-highlight.min.js

effect-highlight.min.js

423 ms

effect-pulsate.min.js

effect-pulsate.min.js

414 ms

effect-size.min.js

effect-size.min.js

414 ms

effect-scale.min.js

effect-scale.min.js

382 ms

effect-shake.min.js

effect-shake.min.js

390 ms

effect-slide.min.js

effect-slide.min.js

401 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

104 ms

effect-transfer.min.js

effect-transfer.min.js

327 ms

plugins.js

plugins.js

437 ms

jquery.carouFredSel-6.2.1.min.js

jquery.carouFredSel-6.2.1.min.js

332 ms

lemmon-slider.min.js

lemmon-slider.min.js

340 ms

jquery.fullPage.min.js

jquery.fullPage.min.js

339 ms

jquery.mousewheel.min.js

jquery.mousewheel.min.js

336 ms

jquery.touchSwipe.min.js

jquery.touchSwipe.min.js

322 ms

packery-mode.pkgd.min.js

packery-mode.pkgd.min.js

327 ms

jquery.stretch.js

jquery.stretch.js

322 ms

imagesloaded.js

imagesloaded.js

322 ms

rangeslider.min.js

rangeslider.min.js

324 ms

jquery.event.move.js

jquery.event.move.js

507 ms

jquery.twentytwenty.js

jquery.twentytwenty.js

490 ms

default_dynamic.js

default_dynamic.js

483 ms

default.min.js

default.min.js

482 ms

custom_js.js

custom_js.js

480 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

481 ms

woocommerce.min.js

woocommerce.min.js

471 ms

select2.full.min.js

select2.full.min.js

444 ms

owl.carousel.js

owl.carousel.js

436 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

427 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

427 ms

logobanner.png

logobanner.png

78 ms

pixel.png

pixel.png

114 ms

zimawebfill-1.jpg

zimawebfill-1.jpg

171 ms

mainbanerreplacement-1.jpg

mainbanerreplacement-1.jpg

209 ms

zimaweb-1.jpg

zimaweb-1.jpg

215 ms

M%C3%A0quina_amb_cadena-copia.jpeg

M%C3%A0quina_amb_cadena-copia.jpeg

715 ms

logobanner-2.png

logobanner-2.png

91 ms

Accessibility Review

bicortechnologies.com accessibility score

80

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

bicortechnologies.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

bicortechnologies.com SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bicortechnologies.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Bicortechnologies.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

bicortechnologies.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Bicortechnologies. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: