Tools & Wizards About Us
biddefordpainting.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 56

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    72% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 71% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 88

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    65% of websites

biddefordpainting.com

Biddeford, ME Painting Company | Biddeford Painting

Page Load Speed

1.6 sec in total

First Response

29 ms

Resources Loaded

491 ms

Page Rendered

1.1 sec

biddefordpainting.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to biddefordpainting.com homepage info - get ready to check Biddeford Painting best content right away, or after learning these important things about biddefordpainting.com

Elevate your space with Biddeford Painting services. Professional, reliable, & tailored to perfection. Transform your home or business. Contact us today!

Visit biddefordpainting.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Biddefordpainting.com page load time and found that the first response time was 29 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

biddefordpainting.com performance score

56

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

25/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value18.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.9 s

82/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value180 ms

91/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.004

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.7 s

29/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

biddefordpainting.com

29 ms

www.biddefordpainting.com

29 ms

jquery.fancybox.css

6 ms

rateit.css

6 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

10 ms

Our browser made a total of 55 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (51 requests) were addressed to the original Biddefordpainting.com, 2% (1 request) were made to Maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Code.jquery.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (301 ms) relates to the external source Cdn.propainterwebsites.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 634.1 kB (14%)

Content Size

4.5 MB

After Optimization

3.8 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Biddefordpainting.com main page is 4.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 4.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 51.4 kB

  • Original 61.4 kB
  • After minification 52.4 kB
  • After compression 10.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 9.0 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 51.4 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 413.4 kB

  • Original 4.1 MB
  • After minification 3.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Biddeford Painting images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-38%

Potential reduce by 64.2 kB

  • Original 169.2 kB
  • After minification 158.9 kB
  • After compression 105.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 64.2 kB or 38% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 105.1 kB

  • Original 122.4 kB
  • After minification 87.9 kB
  • After compression 17.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Biddefordpainting.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 105.1 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (27%)

Requests Now

44

After Optimization

32

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 44 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Biddeford Painting. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

biddefordpainting.com

biddefordpainting.com

29 ms

www.biddefordpainting.com

www.biddefordpainting.com

29 ms

jquery.fancybox.css

jquery.fancybox.css

6 ms

rateit.css

rateit.css

6 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

10 ms

owl.theme.default.min.css

owl.theme.default.min.css

10 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

29 ms

css.css

css.css

24 ms

default.css

default.css

18 ms

jquery-1.12.4.min.js

jquery-1.12.4.min.js

34 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

19 ms

jquery.fancybox.pack.js

jquery.fancybox.pack.js

29 ms

jquery.rateit.js

jquery.rateit.js

26 ms

functions.js

functions.js

26 ms

js.js

js.js

26 ms

js

js

195 ms

logo.png

logo.png

141 ms

banner01.jpg

banner01.jpg

301 ms

phone.svg

phone.svg

9 ms

location-primary.svg

location-primary.svg

13 ms

gbp_round_color.png

gbp_round_color.png

10 ms

facebook_round_color.png

facebook_round_color.png

12 ms

yelp_round_color.png

yelp_round_color.png

12 ms

phone-blue.svg

phone-blue.svg

10 ms

kim2.jpg

kim2.jpg

16 ms

Serving_area_CTA.jpg

Serving_area_CTA.jpg

13 ms

Contact_Us-_CTA.jpg

Contact_Us-_CTA.jpg

17 ms

CTA_background.jpg

CTA_background.jpg

28 ms

16CTA.png

16CTA.png

14 ms

5CTA.png

5CTA.png

14 ms

15CTA.png

15CTA.png

16 ms

13CTA.png

13CTA.png

15 ms

14CTA.png

14CTA.png

18 ms

pattern.png

pattern.png

18 ms

painters_sm1.png

painters_sm1.png

18 ms

testimonial_background.jpg

testimonial_background.jpg

31 ms

t1646152445035_er6.png

t1646152445035_er6.png

25 ms

t1646152463875_ic2.png

t1646152463875_ic2.png

17 ms

t1646152502469_ir1.png

t1646152502469_ir1.png

26 ms

t1646152877765_ir7.png

t1646152877765_ir7.png

27 ms

t1646152394102_ec3.png

t1646152394102_ec3.png

25 ms

PCA-Logo-RGB-resized-web.png

PCA-Logo-RGB-resized-web.png

28 ms

osha_sm.png

osha_sm.png

28 ms

epa.jpg

epa.jpg

29 ms

Roboto-Bold.woff

Roboto-Bold.woff

31 ms

Roboto-Light.woff

Roboto-Light.woff

35 ms

OpenSans.woff

OpenSans.woff

37 ms

OpenSans-Light.woff

OpenSans-Light.woff

35 ms

OpenSans-Semibold.woff

OpenSans-Semibold.woff

36 ms

OpenSans-Bold.woff

OpenSans-Bold.woff

37 ms

OpenSans-Extrabold.woff

OpenSans-Extrabold.woff

38 ms

rockwell-bold-webfont.woff

rockwell-bold-webfont.woff

38 ms

rockwell.woff

rockwell.woff

39 ms

arrow_prev.svg

arrow_prev.svg

57 ms

arrow_next.svg

arrow_next.svg

3 ms

Accessibility Review

biddefordpainting.com accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

biddefordpainting.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

biddefordpainting.com SEO score

88

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Biddefordpainting.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Biddefordpainting.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

biddefordpainting.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Biddeford Painting. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: