Tools & Wizards About Us
bidrop.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 43

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    62% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 88% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

bidrop.com

Best Videographers and Photographers Costa Rica - BiDrop Photography

Page Load Speed

8.3 sec in total

First Response

179 ms

Resources Loaded

7.8 sec

Page Rendered

322 ms

bidrop.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Bi Drop content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about bidrop.com

BiDrop Photography is one of the best professional photographers in Costa Rica. Capture your moments with our professional photography and videography services.

Visit bidrop.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Bidrop.com page load time and found that the first response time was 179 ms and then it took 8.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

bidrop.com performance score

43

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

52/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value14.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value14.1 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value350 ms

73/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.003

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.5 s

8/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

bidrop.com

179 ms

bidrop.com

3444 ms

utilities.css

389 ms

styles.css

426 ms

style.min.css

308 ms

Our browser made a total of 94 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Bidrop.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Bidrop.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 254.7 kB (5%)

Content Size

5.3 MB

After Optimization

5.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Bidrop.com main page is 5.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 129.3 kB

  • Original 153.7 kB
  • After minification 153.7 kB
  • After compression 24.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 129.3 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 71 B

  • Original 4.5 MB
  • After minification 4.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Bi Drop images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 68.5 kB

  • Original 442.3 kB
  • After minification 442.3 kB
  • After compression 373.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 68.5 kB or 15% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-25%

Potential reduce by 56.9 kB

  • Original 223.5 kB
  • After minification 223.5 kB
  • After compression 166.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bidrop.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 56.9 kB or 25% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 70 (88%)

Requests Now

80

After Optimization

10

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 80 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bi Drop. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 38 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 34 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

bidrop.com

bidrop.com

179 ms

bidrop.com

bidrop.com

3444 ms

utilities.css

utilities.css

389 ms

styles.css

styles.css

426 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

308 ms

theme.min.css

theme.min.css

351 ms

header-footer.min.css

header-footer.min.css

334 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

frontend-lite.min.css

213 ms

post-650633.css

post-650633.css

509 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

772 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

832 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

frontend-lite.min.css

369 ms

main.css

main.css

396 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

400 ms

v4-shims.min.css

v4-shims.min.css

429 ms

she-header-style.css

she-header-style.css

770 ms

post-650693.css

post-650693.css

680 ms

post-652340.css

post-652340.css

764 ms

post-652338.css

post-652338.css

822 ms

ekiticons.css

ekiticons.css

708 ms

style.css

style.css

999 ms

splide.min.css

splide.min.css

1066 ms

fancybox3.min.css

fancybox3.min.css

1066 ms

photonic.min.css

photonic.min.css

1077 ms

widget-styles.css

widget-styles.css

852 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

868 ms

fontawesome.min.css

fontawesome.min.css

1218 ms

solid.min.css

solid.min.css

1055 ms

brands.min.css

brands.min.css

1308 ms

utilities.js

utilities.js

1344 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

1092 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

1079 ms

v4-shims.min.js

v4-shims.min.js

1097 ms

she-header.js

she-header.js

1394 ms

widget-icon-box.min.css

widget-icon-box.min.css

1394 ms

widget-nav-menu.min.css

widget-nav-menu.min.css

1327 ms

widget-theme-elements.min.css

widget-theme-elements.min.css

1171 ms

common-vendors.css

common-vendors.css

1427 ms

common.css

common.css

1422 ms

feed.css

feed.css

1059 ms

front-app.css

front-app.css

1344 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

1084 ms

index.js

index.js

1328 ms

index.js

index.js

1152 ms

hello-frontend.min.js

hello-frontend.min.js

1057 ms

ooohboi-steroids.js

ooohboi-steroids.js

1344 ms

frontend-script.js

frontend-script.js

1244 ms

widget-scripts.js

widget-scripts.js

1215 ms

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

1265 ms

splide.min.js

splide.min.js

1178 ms

fancybox3.min.js

fancybox3.min.js

1341 ms

photonic-fancybox3.min.js

photonic-fancybox3.min.js

1132 ms

runtime.js

runtime.js

1052 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

994 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

1172 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

1331 ms

react.min.js

react.min.js

1129 ms

react-dom.min.js

react-dom.min.js

1009 ms

common-vendors.js

common-vendors.js

1407 ms

common.js

common.js

1258 ms

feed.js

feed.js

1153 ms

front-app.js

front-app.js

1062 ms

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

999 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

1295 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

1278 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

1210 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

1298 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

1312 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

1268 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

1146 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

1048 ms

elements-handlers.min.js

elements-handlers.min.js

1377 ms

animate-circle.min.js

animate-circle.min.js

1270 ms

elementor.js

elementor.js

1187 ms

Logo-Bidrop-Images-2017.png

Logo-Bidrop-Images-2017.png

1193 ms

2014-06-13-171135-c-Toh-Gouttenoire-Costa-Rica-wedding-.jpg

2014-06-13-171135-c-Toh-Gouttenoire-Costa-Rica-wedding-.jpg

1919 ms

avenir-book-webfont.woff

avenir-book-webfont.woff

1232 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

1224 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

1149 ms

avenir-medium-webfont.woff

avenir-medium-webfont.woff

1443 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

1638 ms

brandon_reg-webfont.woff

brandon_reg-webfont.woff

1295 ms

brandon_med-webfont.woff

brandon_med-webfont.woff

1281 ms

brandon_bld-webfont.woff

brandon_bld-webfont.woff

1292 ms

avenirnext-bold-webfont.woff

avenirnext-bold-webfont.woff

1335 ms

eicons.woff

eicons.woff

1761 ms

avenir_book_oblique-webfont.woff

avenir_book_oblique-webfont.woff

1600 ms

avenir_light-webfont.woff

avenir_light-webfont.woff

1610 ms

Feature-New-York-Times.jpg

Feature-New-York-Times.jpg

1556 ms

Feature-ADI.jpg

Feature-ADI.jpg

1995 ms

10257912_540742979423497_3125806445335032184_o.jpg

10257912_540742979423497_3125806445335032184_o.jpg

1611 ms

costa-rica-4-768x511.jpg

costa-rica-4-768x511.jpg

1968 ms

001c-bidrop.com-2018-04-09-160835-219.jpg

001c-bidrop.com-2018-04-09-160835-219.jpg

2235 ms

c-bidrop.com-2019-10-16-093051-02.jpg

c-bidrop.com-2019-10-16-093051-02.jpg

2267 ms

Accessibility Review

bidrop.com accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

bidrop.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

bidrop.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bidrop.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Bidrop.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

bidrop.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Bi Drop. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: