Tools & Wizards About Us
bigbase1.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 55

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    72% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 71% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

bigbase1.com

太阳集团城网站(澳门)股份有限公司-搜狗百科

Page Load Speed

2.8 sec in total

First Response

304 ms

Resources Loaded

2.3 sec

Page Rendered

202 ms

bigbase1.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Bigbase 1 content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about bigbase1.com

✅”太阳集团城网站“隶属于中国上海”太阳集团城网站“供应链(集团)有限公司主要从事物流运输,仓储服务,集装箱堆场,集装箱掏箱等服务,拥有丰富的物流运输行业经验,致力于为广大客户提供一体化供应链管理服务.供应链管理体系完善,收费合理透明,如有仓储服务,集装箱堆场,集装箱掏箱业务需求

Visit bigbase1.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Bigbase1.com page load time and found that the first response time was 304 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

bigbase1.com performance score

55

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

18/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.6 s

17/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.3 s

76/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value360 ms

72/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.078

95/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.7 s

56/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

bigbase1.com

304 ms

css

24 ms

bootstrap.css

377 ms

font-awesome.css

275 ms

magnific-popup.css

309 ms

Our browser made a total of 42 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (36 requests) were addressed to the original Bigbase1.com, 12% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Bigbase1.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.6 MB (85%)

Content Size

1.9 MB

After Optimization

290.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Bigbase1.com main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 7.6 kB

  • Original 10.5 kB
  • After minification 8.9 kB
  • After compression 2.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 1.6 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 7.6 kB or 73% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-21%

Potential reduce by 1.5 kB

  • Original 7.3 kB
  • After minification 5.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Bigbase 1 needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.5 kB or 21% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 932.5 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 688.7 kB
  • After compression 184.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 932.5 kB or 83% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 673.3 kB

  • Original 770.2 kB
  • After minification 635.8 kB
  • After compression 96.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bigbase1.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 673.3 kB or 87% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (89%)

Requests Now

35

After Optimization

4

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bigbase 1. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

bigbase1.com

bigbase1.com

304 ms

css

css

24 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

377 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

275 ms

magnific-popup.css

magnific-popup.css

309 ms

datepicker3.css

datepicker3.css

254 ms

elusive-webfont.css

elusive-webfont.css

264 ms

summernote.css

summernote.css

262 ms

summernote-bs3.css

summernote-bs3.css

635 ms

codemirror.css

codemirror.css

523 ms

monokai.css

monokai.css

526 ms

bootstrap-timepicker.css

bootstrap-timepicker.css

530 ms

theme.css

theme.css

808 ms

custom.css

custom.css

632 ms

modernizr.js

modernizr.js

789 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

1074 ms

jquery.browser.mobile.js

jquery.browser.mobile.js

781 ms

bootstrap.js

bootstrap.js

896 ms

bootstrap-datepicker.js

bootstrap-datepicker.js

905 ms

magnific-popup.js

magnific-popup.js

1052 ms

jquery.placeholder.js

jquery.placeholder.js

1036 ms

nanoscroller.js

nanoscroller.js

1133 ms

codemirror.js

codemirror.js

1411 ms

active-line.js

active-line.js

1162 ms

matchbrackets.js

matchbrackets.js

1289 ms

javascript.js

javascript.js

1319 ms

xml.js

xml.js

1331 ms

htmlmixed.js

htmlmixed.js

1340 ms

css.js

css.js

1437 ms

summernote.js

summernote.js

1547 ms

bootstrap-timepicker.js

bootstrap-timepicker.js

1579 ms

examples.modals.js

examples.modals.js

1584 ms

theme.js

theme.js

1771 ms

theme.init.js

theme.init.js

1537 ms

bg.png

bg.png

567 ms

captcha

captcha

634 ms

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

11 ms

DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

20 ms

MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

20 ms

k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

20 ms

EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-honF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-honF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

20 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

800 ms

Accessibility Review

bigbase1.com accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

bigbase1.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

bigbase1.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bigbase1.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Bigbase1.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

bigbase1.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Bigbase 1. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: