5.1 sec in total
778 ms
3.9 sec
414 ms
Visit bigfile.to now to see the best up-to-date Bigfile content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about bigfile.to
Visit bigfile.toWe analyzed Bigfile.to page load time and found that the first response time was 778 ms and then it took 4.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
bigfile.to performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.0 s
50/100
10%
Value3.1 s
74/100
25%
Value3.0 s
94/100
10%
Value100 ms
98/100
30%
Value0.196
63/100
15%
Value3.1 s
95/100
10%
778 ms
59 ms
297 ms
645 ms
718 ms
Our browser made a total of 30 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 87% of them (26 requests) were addressed to the original Bigfile.to, 10% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 3% (1 request) were made to S7.addthis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Bigfile.to.
Page size can be reduced by 719.9 kB (42%)
1.7 MB
987.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Bigfile.to main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 728.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 40.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 40.2 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 17.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Bigfile images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 403.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 403.0 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 258.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bigfile.to needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 258.8 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (39%)
28
17
The browser has sent 28 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bigfile. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.bigfile.to
778 ms
css
59 ms
main.css
297 ms
jquery-1.11.3.min.js
645 ms
jquery.tools-1.2.5.min.js
718 ms
main.js
417 ms
bootstrap.min.css
567 ms
main.css
334 ms
font-awesome.min.css
387 ms
css
68 ms
upload.css
439 ms
upload.js
486 ms
css
14 ms
header_menu_bg.gif
583 ms
bg_1.jpg
683 ms
logo.png
583 ms
bg_2.jpg
558 ms
bg_3.jpg
559 ms
computer.png
759 ms
ball_1.gif
748 ms
ball_2.gif
755 ms
ball_3.gif
653 ms
bg_4.jpg
754 ms
folder.png
1827 ms
p_1.gif
863 ms
p_2.gif
932 ms
p_3.gif
1059 ms
glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff
958 ms
addthis_widget.js
539 ms
ft_bg.jpg
327 ms
bigfile.to accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
bigfile.to best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Uses deprecated APIs
bigfile.to SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bigfile.to can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Bigfile.to main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
bigfile.to
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Bigfile. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: