1.5 sec in total
70 ms
910 ms
499 ms
Click here to check amazing Big Rattle content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about bigrattle.com
Big Rattle Technologies Mobile App Development (iOS, Android, Windows Mobile) Company in India. We also offer Web Development, Social Media (SMO) services & Internet Marketing (SEO) services.
Visit bigrattle.comWe analyzed Bigrattle.com page load time and found that the first response time was 70 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.
bigrattle.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.8 s
56/100
10%
Value3.2 s
72/100
25%
Value6.5 s
39/100
10%
Value850 ms
34/100
30%
Value0.003
100/100
15%
Value8.2 s
40/100
10%
70 ms
10 ms
47 ms
41 ms
15 ms
Our browser made a total of 68 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 66% of them (45 requests) were addressed to the original Bigrattle.com, 7% (5 requests) were made to Gstatic.com and 7% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (266 ms) belongs to the original domain Bigrattle.com.
Page size can be reduced by 589.3 kB (30%)
2.0 MB
1.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Bigrattle.com main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 43.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 23.8 kB, which is 47% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 43.8 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Big Rattle images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 339.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 339.5 kB or 60% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 203.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bigrattle.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 203.1 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (57%)
58
25
The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Big Rattle. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
bigrattle.com
70 ms
bootstrap.min.css
10 ms
css
47 ms
style.css
41 ms
prettyPhoto.css
15 ms
layerslider.css
16 ms
jquery-1.10.2.min.js
13 ms
jquery.queryloader2.js
16 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
16 ms
smoothscroll.js
33 ms
jquery.parallax.js
72 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
102 ms
functions.js
71 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
117 ms
jquery.counterup.min.js
127 ms
js
182 ms
gmap3.min.js
126 ms
waypoints.min.js
130 ms
tab.js
127 ms
collapse.js
129 ms
carousel.js
129 ms
transition.js
133 ms
layerslider.transitions.js
133 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js
144 ms
wow.min.js
137 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
143 ms
jquery.mixitup.min.js
142 ms
jquery.stellar.min.js
141 ms
api.js
142 ms
log.js
86 ms
brtlogo.png
86 ms
icon_group_image.png
265 ms
honkeyLogo.png
265 ms
priceHawk.png
264 ms
mobisecure.png
266 ms
ashoke.jpg
85 ms
girish.jpg
89 ms
map.png
105 ms
map_mobile.png
100 ms
bigrattle.com.js
211 ms
analytics.js
98 ms
skin.css
33 ms
WEB.jpg
99 ms
WEB_mobile.jpg
97 ms
CONSULTING.jpg
100 ms
CONSULTING_mobile.jpg
44 ms
SEO.jpg
97 ms
SEO_mobile.jpg
95 ms
DESIGN.jpg
102 ms
DESIGN_mobile.jpg
101 ms
recaptcha__en.js
97 ms
BebasNeue-webfont.woff
97 ms
glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff
99 ms
glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff
34 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
83 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
85 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
84 ms
justvectorv2-webfont.woff
86 ms
collect
75 ms
fallback
24 ms
fallback__ltr.css
2 ms
payload
19 ms
css
88 ms
logo_48.png
4 ms
refresh.png
15 ms
audio.png
16 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
27 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
30 ms
bigrattle.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
bigrattle.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
bigrattle.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
robots.txt is not valid
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bigrattle.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Bigrattle.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
bigrattle.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Big Rattle. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: