5.8 sec in total
501 ms
4.9 sec
476 ms
Visit bigship.in now to see the best up-to-date Bigship content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about bigship.in
Bigship is India's largest Courier Aggregator. Service provided like Document Courier, B2B, Hyperlocal and Ecommerce-retail with 29,000+ pin codes in India.
Visit bigship.inWe analyzed Bigship.in page load time and found that the first response time was 501 ms and then it took 5.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
bigship.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.4 s
16/100
10%
Value10.4 s
0/100
25%
Value7.6 s
26/100
10%
Value620 ms
48/100
30%
Value0.291
41/100
15%
Value11.5 s
18/100
10%
501 ms
1523 ms
1002 ms
1226 ms
985 ms
Our browser made a total of 77 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 69% of them (53 requests) were addressed to the original Bigship.in, 12% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Bigship.in.
Page size can be reduced by 426.1 kB (56%)
765.1 kB
339.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Bigship.in main page is 765.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 265.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 58.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 20.2 kB, which is 29% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 58.2 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Bigship images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 165.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 165.7 kB or 62% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 198.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bigship.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 198.9 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (29%)
65
46
The browser has sent 65 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bigship. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
bigship.in
501 ms
bigship.in
1523 ms
bootstrap.min.css
1002 ms
font-awesome.min.css
1226 ms
owl.carousel.min.css
985 ms
owl.theme.default.css
997 ms
css2
30 ms
style.css
1252 ms
js
88 ms
jquery.min.js
1019 ms
bootstrap.min.js
1011 ms
owl.carousel.js
1011 ms
slick.js
809 ms
script.js
1010 ms
js
57 ms
analytics.js
82 ms
gtm.js
94 ms
bigship-logo.webp
284 ms
banner.webp
285 ms
border-background.png
477 ms
bs_truck.png
481 ms
service-section-bg.webp
483 ms
Service-mobile-bg.webp
491 ms
rod.webp
535 ms
big.png
536 ms
stepimg_1.webp
737 ms
stepimg_3.webp
736 ms
stepimg_2.webp
736 ms
stepimg_4.webp
745 ms
sec-1.webp
790 ms
sec-2.webp
791 ms
sec-3.webp
986 ms
sec-4.webp
985 ms
block-car01.png
985 ms
vector-bc.webp
996 ms
boss.webp
1045 ms
box-bc.webp
1044 ms
1.jpg
1229 ms
2.jpg
1230 ms
3.jpg
1239 ms
4.jpg
1248 ms
logo-c-2.png
1295 ms
logo-c-3.png
1294 ms
logo-c-5.png
1480 ms
amazon-shipping-logo.jpg
1479 ms
logo-c-6.jpg
1488 ms
logo-c-7.png
1504 ms
logo-c-aramex.jpg
1520 ms
BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjojISWaw.woff
58 ms
BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjovoSWaw.woff
99 ms
BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjo0oSWaw.woff
113 ms
BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjoDISWaw.woff
114 ms
BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjojIWWaw.woff
115 ms
BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjoUoOWaw.woff
115 ms
BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjoa4OWaw.woff
112 ms
BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjoDIOWaw.woff
112 ms
BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjoJYOWaw.woff
114 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1518 ms
kiwi-sdk-17-prod-min.js
227 ms
kiwi-sdk-17-prod-min.js
236 ms
collect
78 ms
4h04au01d5
146 ms
fbevents.js
79 ms
js
49 ms
collect
94 ms
logo-c-dhl-express.jpg
1498 ms
logo-c-tnt.jpg
1499 ms
logo-c-ups.jpg
1511 ms
madeinindia.webp
1502 ms
ga-audiences
27 ms
clarity.js
14 ms
border-background.webp
1516 ms
login-icon.png
1517 ms
ab.png
1498 ms
blog-icon.png
1494 ms
plan.png
1511 ms
c.gif
7 ms
bigship.in accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
ARIA IDs are not unique
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
bigship.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
bigship.in SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bigship.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Bigship.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
bigship.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Bigship. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: