Access bigshrimp.se.

Report Summary

About Website

Visit bigshrimp.se now to see the best up-to-date Bigshrimp content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about bigshrimp.se

Webbyrå i Stockholm Full fokus på WordPress, e-handel och synlighet genom SEO. Vi erbjuder tre nivåer av paket,...

Visit bigshrimp.se

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.0 s

10/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.2 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.0 s

21/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value630 ms

47/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.5 s

30/100

10%

bigshrimp.se

758 ms

frontend.css

274 ms

iziModal.css

390 ms

icons.css

297 ms

widgets_style.css

293 ms

Our browser made a total of 117 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (100 requests) were addressed to the original Bigshrimp.se, 13% (15 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Bigshrimp.se.

Content Size

2.3 MB

After Optimization

2.1 MB

In fact, the total size of Bigshrimp.se main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 105.9 kB

Original 128.0 kB
After minification 123.2 kB
After compression 22.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 105.9 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 79.4 kB

Original 1.6 MB
After minification 1.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Bigshrimp images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 5.3 kB

Original 320.2 kB
After minification 320.2 kB
After compression 315.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 12.4 kB

Original 246.2 kB
After minification 245.8 kB
After compression 233.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bigshrimp.se has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 97 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bigshrimp. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 47 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 38 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Issues

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Areas of Improvement

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

Language Detected

N/A
Language Claimed

SV
Encoding

UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bigshrimp.se can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is Swedish. Our system also found out that Bigshrimp.se main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

bigshrimp.se

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Bigshrimp. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook:

Report Summary

Performance

Accessibility

Best Practices

SEO

Page Load Speed

First Response

Resources Loaded

Page Rendered

About Website

Key Findings

Performance Metrics

Measured Metrics

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

SI (Speed Index)

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

TTI (Time to Interactive)