1.6 sec in total
213 ms
1.2 sec
189 ms
Click here to check amazing Big Thunk content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about bigthunk.com
With Business by Design Your Business Stands Out Do your prospects recognize you?
Visit bigthunk.comWe analyzed Bigthunk.com page load time and found that the first response time was 213 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
bigthunk.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.0 s
49/100
10%
Value11.0 s
0/100
25%
Value8.0 s
21/100
10%
Value1,540 ms
13/100
30%
Value0.291
41/100
15%
Value10.8 s
22/100
10%
213 ms
314 ms
83 ms
82 ms
334 ms
Our browser made a total of 28 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 46% of them (13 requests) were addressed to the original Bigthunk.com, 25% (7 requests) were made to C0.wp.com and 7% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (655 ms) belongs to the original domain Bigthunk.com.
Page size can be reduced by 364.0 kB (30%)
1.2 MB
832.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Bigthunk.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 907.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 33.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 33.2 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Big Thunk images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 324.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 324.5 kB or 36% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bigthunk.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (76%)
25
6
The browser has sent 25 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Big Thunk. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
bigthunk.com
213 ms
bigthunk.com
314 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
83 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
82 ms
87a826edb1a2bfc61621afa397b9a2c6.min.css
334 ms
jetpack.css
85 ms
jquery.min.js
90 ms
rs6.css
215 ms
image-cdn.js
214 ms
index.js
215 ms
index.js
218 ms
rbtools.min.js
441 ms
rs6.min.js
632 ms
api.js
152 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
88 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
88 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
88 ms
index.js
284 ms
e-202410.js
88 ms
f8bd34b3d4b508ce7c2aa33d37550f0d.min.js
655 ms
analytics.js
61 ms
BigThunk-Visual-Identity.jpg
124 ms
BigThunk-Logo-300.png
219 ms
BigThunk-Brand-and-Logo.jpg
208 ms
awb-icons.woff
198 ms
recaptcha__de.js
99 ms
collect
42 ms
js
125 ms
bigthunk.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
bigthunk.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
bigthunk.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bigthunk.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Bigthunk.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
bigthunk.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Big Thunk. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: