Tools & Wizards About Us
billmoore.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 47

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    65% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

billmoore.com

Sign, Design & Lighting Consultant - Bill Moore & Associates

Page Load Speed

1.8 sec in total

First Response

130 ms

Resources Loaded

1.6 sec

Page Rendered

57 ms

billmoore.com screenshot

About Website

Visit billmoore.com now to see the best up-to-date Bill Moore content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about billmoore.com

Your signage tells your story. Talk to our sign experts now and see how we can turn your idea into reality.

Visit billmoore.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Billmoore.com page load time and found that the first response time was 130 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

billmoore.com performance score

47

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

36/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.9 s

3/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.1 s

45/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value400 ms

67/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.037

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.0 s

27/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.billmoore.com

130 ms

minified.js

34 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

29 ms

polyfill.min.js

63 ms

thunderbolt-commons.b70ee867.bundle.min.js

21 ms

Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Billmoore.com, 42% (22 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com and 28% (15 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (814 ms) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 637.0 kB (55%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

516.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Billmoore.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 706.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 562.6 kB

  • Original 706.2 kB
  • After minification 704.5 kB
  • After compression 143.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 562.6 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-18%

Potential reduce by 26.3 kB

  • Original 143.4 kB
  • After minification 117.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Bill Moore needs image optimization as it can save up to 26.3 kB or 18% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 48.1 kB

  • Original 304.3 kB
  • After minification 304.3 kB
  • After compression 256.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 48.1 kB or 16% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (27%)

Requests Now

37

After Optimization

27

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 37 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bill Moore. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.billmoore.com

www.billmoore.com

130 ms

minified.js

minified.js

34 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

focus-within-polyfill.js

29 ms

polyfill.min.js

polyfill.min.js

63 ms

thunderbolt-commons.b70ee867.bundle.min.js

thunderbolt-commons.b70ee867.bundle.min.js

21 ms

main.317ed945.bundle.min.js

main.317ed945.bundle.min.js

50 ms

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

20 ms

lodash.min.js

lodash.min.js

51 ms

react.production.min.js

react.production.min.js

21 ms

react-dom.production.min.js

react-dom.production.min.js

50 ms

siteTags.bundle.min.js

siteTags.bundle.min.js

49 ms

BMAPH.png

BMAPH.png

193 ms

bundle.min.js

bundle.min.js

56 ms

84f574_789a12adf9b744a4aaf6c1ad4eff0ddf~mv2.jpg

84f574_789a12adf9b744a4aaf6c1ad4eff0ddf~mv2.jpg

208 ms

84f574_685e831327b141afa08c4f6d882d104d~mv2.jpg

84f574_685e831327b141afa08c4f6d882d104d~mv2.jpg

254 ms

84f574_e78a6a29879f4b5d98327678e8364108~mv2.jpg

84f574_e78a6a29879f4b5d98327678e8364108~mv2.jpg

250 ms

consulting.png

consulting.png

262 ms

Design.png

Design.png

212 ms

Work.png

Work.png

366 ms

84f574_883aed6d2d9c4e6e8b31d221b10889b2~mv2.png

84f574_883aed6d2d9c4e6e8b31d221b10889b2~mv2.png

377 ms

84f574_e744faff053b4346ab9e3f883b2c8e07~mv2.png

84f574_e744faff053b4346ab9e3f883b2c8e07~mv2.png

463 ms

84f574_2936fdd4d02e46969e39b50527074c5d~mv2.png

84f574_2936fdd4d02e46969e39b50527074c5d~mv2.png

435 ms

84f574_dd158ab7e17f48a6895c4ef96478935a~mv2.png

84f574_dd158ab7e17f48a6895c4ef96478935a~mv2.png

419 ms

84f574_f7f790c9644243fb98e65263072ee417~mv2.png

84f574_f7f790c9644243fb98e65263072ee417~mv2.png

497 ms

84f574_ddff48854e724c6e83ff3e2353927c41~mv2.png

84f574_ddff48854e724c6e83ff3e2353927c41~mv2.png

574 ms

84f574_6256b3f0020d46d4be81a3be2dc7830c~mv2.png

84f574_6256b3f0020d46d4be81a3be2dc7830c~mv2.png

578 ms

84f574_b9415ccfb1eb483190e62274edff4e9c~mv2.png

84f574_b9415ccfb1eb483190e62274edff4e9c~mv2.png

618 ms

84f574_39456b8f44d549f99c86a6fb9049dbbd~mv2.png

84f574_39456b8f44d549f99c86a6fb9049dbbd~mv2.png

629 ms

84f574_1acfa7403ab9473e984eb1d30455db1c~mv2.png

84f574_1acfa7403ab9473e984eb1d30455db1c~mv2.png

632 ms

84f574_04a0f889b7874e24ba695c59d3c3cb0b~mv2.png

84f574_04a0f889b7874e24ba695c59d3c3cb0b~mv2.png

708 ms

84f574_2a43f34b37214c1aaecaba967cc44838~mv2.png

84f574_2a43f34b37214c1aaecaba967cc44838~mv2.png

772 ms

84f574_7783f977aa7e489484af1e91faa03e49~mv2.png

84f574_7783f977aa7e489484af1e91faa03e49~mv2.png

814 ms

84f574_13587be50b3845a4939a683a39a80244~mv2.png

84f574_13587be50b3845a4939a683a39a80244~mv2.png

792 ms

84f574_8cf42d24078c4533a70e9599b2908b42~mv2.png

84f574_8cf42d24078c4533a70e9599b2908b42~mv2.png

814 ms

103 ms

100 ms

98 ms

100 ms

99 ms

96 ms

130 ms

130 ms

130 ms

131 ms

129 ms

127 ms

deprecation-en.v5.html

deprecation-en.v5.html

4 ms

bolt-performance

bolt-performance

18 ms

deprecation-style.v5.css

deprecation-style.v5.css

4 ms

right-arrow.svg

right-arrow.svg

11 ms

WixMadeforDisplay_W_Bd.woff

WixMadeforDisplay_W_Bd.woff

3 ms

WixMadeforText_W_Bd.woff

WixMadeforText_W_Bd.woff

6 ms

WixMadeforText_W_Rg.woff

WixMadeforText_W_Rg.woff

6 ms

Accessibility Review

billmoore.com accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

billmoore.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

billmoore.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Billmoore.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Billmoore.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

billmoore.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Bill Moore. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: