Tools & Wizards About Us
billsgaff.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 47

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    65% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 71% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

billsgaff.com

Fishing Supplies | Central Chebogue, NS - Bills Gaffs

Page Load Speed

4.2 sec in total

First Response

162 ms

Resources Loaded

3.6 sec

Page Rendered

449 ms

billsgaff.com screenshot

About Website

Visit billsgaff.com now to see the best up-to-date Bills Gaff content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about billsgaff.com

Pick up everything you need to land the big one at Bills Gaffs in Central Chebogue, NS. We sell a wide range of high-quality fishing supplies.

Visit billsgaff.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Billsgaff.com page load time and found that the first response time was 162 ms and then it took 4.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

billsgaff.com performance score

47

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

38/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.4 s

10/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.1 s

45/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value160 ms

93/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value1.003

2/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.3 s

84/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

billsgaff.com

162 ms

jquery.js

90 ms

button.css

64 ms

browserBehavior.js

39 ms

utils.js

41 ms

Our browser made a total of 58 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 28% of them (16 requests) were addressed to the original Billsgaff.com, 55% (32 requests) were made to Assets.myregisteredsite.com and 10% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.1 sec) relates to the external source 11686515.cstsite.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 229.0 kB (23%)

Content Size

1.0 MB

After Optimization

783.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Billsgaff.com main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 811.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 80.8 kB

  • Original 107.8 kB
  • After minification 107.1 kB
  • After compression 27.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 80.8 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 129.2 kB

  • Original 811.6 kB
  • After minification 682.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Bills Gaff needs image optimization as it can save up to 129.2 kB or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-21%

Potential reduce by 18.3 kB

  • Original 88.9 kB
  • After minification 86.2 kB
  • After compression 70.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 18.3 kB or 21% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 643 B

  • Original 4.3 kB
  • After minification 4.3 kB
  • After compression 3.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Billsgaff.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 643 B or 15% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (67%)

Requests Now

45

After Optimization

15

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bills Gaff. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

billsgaff.com

billsgaff.com

162 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

90 ms

button.css

button.css

64 ms

browserBehavior.js

browserBehavior.js

39 ms

utils.js

utils.js

41 ms

shared.js

shared.js

62 ms

navigation.js

navigation.js

42 ms

uaDefaultStylesReset.css

uaDefaultStylesReset.css

68 ms

popup.js

popup.js

42 ms

ResourceLoader.js

ResourceLoader.js

68 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

140 ms

shared.js

shared.js

117 ms

button.css

button.css

117 ms

uaDefaultStylesReset.css

uaDefaultStylesReset.css

115 ms

ResourceLoader.js

ResourceLoader.js

115 ms

googleFonts.css

googleFonts.css

21 ms

css

css

32 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

41 ms

navigation.js

navigation.js

22 ms

core.js

core.js

20 ms

jqueryvalidate.js

jqueryvalidate.js

23 ms

form.js

form.js

23 ms

footercontact.js

footercontact.js

48 ms

hoverIntent.js

hoverIntent.js

24 ms

bgIframe.js

bgIframe.js

23 ms

superfish.js

superfish.js

21 ms

handler.js

handler.js

22 ms

helper.js

helper.js

20 ms

positioner.js

positioner.js

37 ms

structure.css

structure.css

37 ms

utils.js

utils.js

39 ms

resources.js

resources.js

42 ms

templates.js

templates.js

41 ms

form.css

form.css

43 ms

form_generic.css

form_generic.css

58 ms

jquery.json-2.2.min.js

jquery.json-2.2.min.js

60 ms

templates.js

templates.js

60 ms

footercontact.css

footercontact.css

60 ms

124460404.png

124460404.png

3112 ms

124454311.png

124454311.png

175 ms

124457381.jpg

124457381.jpg

196 ms

124458696.png

124458696.png

125 ms

124459387.jpg

124459387.jpg

187 ms

124459388.jpg

124459388.jpg

174 ms

124459389.jpg

124459389.jpg

214 ms

124459390.jpg

124459390.jpg

245 ms

124459393.jpg

124459393.jpg

296 ms

124748590.jpg

124748590.jpg

274 ms

108734594.png

108734594.png

227 ms

124458165.jpg

124458165.jpg

343 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

84 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

103 ms

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1xZosUZiYA.ttf

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1xZosUZiYA.ttf

113 ms

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1_FvsUZiYA.ttf

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1_FvsUZiYA.ttf

114 ms

logger.php

logger.php

102 ms

tDbD2oWUg0MKqScQ6A.ttf

tDbD2oWUg0MKqScQ6A.ttf

78 ms

tDbM2oWUg0MKoZw1-LPK9g.ttf

tDbM2oWUg0MKoZw1-LPK9g.ttf

96 ms

logger.php

logger.php

80 ms

Accessibility Review

billsgaff.com accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

billsgaff.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

billsgaff.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Billsgaff.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Billsgaff.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

billsgaff.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Bills Gaff. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: