Tools & Wizards About Us
bingdigital.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 69

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    80% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 94% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

bingdigital.com

Ecommerce & Digital Marketing Agency – Bing Digital

Page Load Speed

4.7 sec in total

First Response

149 ms

Resources Loaded

3.6 sec

Page Rendered

967 ms

bingdigital.com screenshot

About Website

Visit bingdigital.com now to see the best up-to-date Bing Digital content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about bingdigital.com

A Full Service eCommerce Agency established in 1999 - recommended for growing brands through Data Driven UX Design, Development & Marketing.

Visit bingdigital.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Bingdigital.com page load time and found that the first response time was 149 ms and then it took 4.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

bingdigital.com performance score

69

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

21/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.1 s

26/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.1 s

79/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value10 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.0 s

77/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

bingdigital.com

149 ms

www.bingdigital.com

120 ms

style.min.css

278 ms

lottiefiles-frontend.css.css

272 ms

grid.min.css

282 ms

Our browser made a total of 58 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 98% of them (57 requests) were addressed to the original Bingdigital.com, 2% (1 request) were made to Api.ecologi.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Bingdigital.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 973.9 kB (28%)

Content Size

3.5 MB

After Optimization

2.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Bingdigital.com main page is 3.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 188.9 kB

  • Original 234.1 kB
  • After minification 227.1 kB
  • After compression 45.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 188.9 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-25%

Potential reduce by 779.6 kB

  • Original 3.1 MB
  • After minification 2.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Bing Digital needs image optimization as it can save up to 779.6 kB or 25% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 22 B

  • Original 3.7 kB
  • After minification 3.7 kB
  • After compression 3.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 5.5 kB

  • Original 140.1 kB
  • After minification 136.1 kB
  • After compression 134.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bingdigital.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (67%)

Requests Now

52

After Optimization

17

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 52 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bing Digital. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 36 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

bingdigital.com

bingdigital.com

149 ms

www.bingdigital.com

www.bingdigital.com

120 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

278 ms

lottiefiles-frontend.css.css

lottiefiles-frontend.css.css

272 ms

grid.min.css

grid.min.css

282 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

275 ms

jquery.fancybox.min.css

jquery.fancybox.min.css

259 ms

lineicons.min.css

lineicons.min.css

254 ms

main.css

main.css

518 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

508 ms

theme.min.css

theme.min.css

532 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

frontend-lite.min.css

624 ms

post-8.css

post-8.css

538 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

522 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

754 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

frontend-lite.min.css

786 ms

she-header-style.css

she-header-style.css

778 ms

global.css

global.css

791 ms

post-1392156.css

post-1392156.css

805 ms

post-13.css

post-13.css

876 ms

post-1392053.css

post-1392053.css

998 ms

post-1392013.css

post-1392013.css

1043 ms

post-10.css

post-10.css

1027 ms

style.css

style.css

1041 ms

fontawesome.min.css

fontawesome.min.css

1062 ms

solid.min.css

solid.min.css

1123 ms

widget-nav-menu.min.css

widget-nav-menu.min.css

1259 ms

widget-icon-box.min.css

widget-icon-box.min.css

1273 ms

widget-icon-list.min.css

widget-icon-list.min.css

1303 ms

widget-posts.min.css

widget-posts.min.css

1295 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

1062 ms

gravity-forms-theme-reset.min.css

gravity-forms-theme-reset.min.css

1377 ms

gravity-forms-theme-foundation.min.css

gravity-forms-theme-foundation.min.css

1380 ms

gravity-forms-theme-framework.min.css

gravity-forms-theme-framework.min.css

1592 ms

post-1393584.css

post-1393584.css

1547 ms

animations.min.css

animations.min.css

1559 ms

basic.min.css

basic.min.css

1553 ms

theme-ie11.min.css

theme-ie11.min.css

1518 ms

theme.min.css

theme.min.css

1530 ms

lazyload.min.js

lazyload.min.js

1557 ms

gilroy-semi-bold.woff

gilroy-semi-bold.woff

840 ms

gilroy-bold.woff

gilroy-bold.woff

852 ms

gilroy-extra-bold.woff

gilroy-extra-bold.woff

705 ms

gilroy-black.woff

gilroy-black.woff

1027 ms

62d3e65005736ce671fbc932

62d3e65005736ce671fbc932

469 ms

BD-1.svg

BD-1.svg

253 ms

herman-miller-1.svg

herman-miller-1.svg

248 ms

Main_Logo__x28_No_Splash_x29__00000110471481993354300100000001285481787710656662_-1.svg

Main_Logo__x28_No_Splash_x29__00000110471481993354300100000001285481787710656662_-1.svg

391 ms

seiko-1.svg

seiko-1.svg

407 ms

hackett-london-1.svg

hackett-london-1.svg

406 ms

mcafee-logo-2017-1-1.svg

mcafee-logo-2017-1-1.svg

503 ms

pepe-jeans-1-1.svg

pepe-jeans-1-1.svg

512 ms

Phone-Pad-Screens@2x-1-644x1024.png

Phone-Pad-Screens@2x-1-644x1024.png

999 ms

np_arrow_1959730_000000.svg

np_arrow_1959730_000000.svg

646 ms

Image.png

Image.png

956 ms

Image2.png

Image2.png

1161 ms

Image-4@2x-1.png

Image-4@2x-1.png

1254 ms

Image-5@2x-1.png

Image-5@2x-1.png

1338 ms

Accessibility Review

bingdigital.com accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

bingdigital.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

bingdigital.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bingdigital.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Bingdigital.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

bingdigital.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Bing Digital. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: