Report Summary

  • 14

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    26% of other websites

  • 74

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 41% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

biocamp.ir

گروه هلدینگ تحقیقاتی بیوکمپ|کارگاه آموزشی ژنتیک|دارویی و بیوانفورماتیک

Page Load Speed

8.5 sec in total

First Response

458 ms

Resources Loaded

7.7 sec

Page Rendered

364 ms

biocamp.ir screenshot

About Website

Visit biocamp.ir now to see the best up-to-date Biocamp content for Iran and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about biocamp.ir

گروه هلدینگ تحقیقاتی بیوکمپ: برگزاری کارگاه آموزشی ژنتیک, انجام خدمات تحقیقاتی در زمینه ژنتیک،دارویی،بیوانفورماتیک،تولید مواد و آنزیم های بیوتکنولوژی,BioCamp.IR

Visit biocamp.ir

Key Findings

We analyzed Biocamp.ir page load time and found that the first response time was 458 ms and then it took 8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

biocamp.ir performance score

14

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.1 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value33.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value49.4 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value67,810 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.072

96/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value82.7 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

biocamp.ir

458 ms

biocamp.ir

4068 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

93 ms

all.css

198 ms

profile-widget.css

264 ms

Our browser made a total of 152 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 99% of them (151 requests) were addressed to the original Biocamp.ir, 1% (1 request) were made to C204025.parspack.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Biocamp.ir.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 796.0 kB (23%)

Content Size

3.5 MB

After Optimization

2.7 MB

In fact, the total size of Biocamp.ir main page is 3.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 156.9 kB

  • Original 184.4 kB
  • After minification 176.6 kB
  • After compression 27.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 156.9 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 422.5 kB

  • Original 2.6 MB
  • After minification 2.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Biocamp needs image optimization as it can save up to 422.5 kB or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 2.5 kB

  • Original 97.6 kB
  • After minification 97.2 kB
  • After compression 95.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-38%

Potential reduce by 214.1 kB

  • Original 568.9 kB
  • After minification 567.6 kB
  • After compression 354.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Biocamp.ir needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 214.1 kB or 38% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 103 (76%)

Requests Now

136

After Optimization

33

The browser has sent 136 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Biocamp. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 46 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 59 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

biocamp.ir accessibility score

74

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

biocamp.ir best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

biocamp.ir SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    FA

  • Language Claimed

    FA

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Biocamp.ir can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Persian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Biocamp.ir main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Biocamp. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: