1.4 sec in total
24 ms
1.3 sec
161 ms
Click here to check amazing Biocom content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about biocom.org
Biocom California partners with life science companies to create momentum, allowing our members to discover life-changing innovation.
Visit biocom.orgWe analyzed Biocom.org page load time and found that the first response time was 24 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
biocom.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.9 s
24/100
10%
Value4.1 s
46/100
25%
Value8.0 s
22/100
10%
Value770 ms
38/100
30%
Value0.005
100/100
15%
Value39.6 s
0/100
10%
24 ms
64 ms
15 ms
42 ms
49 ms
Our browser made a total of 66 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (52 requests) were addressed to the original Biocom.org, 3% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to T.co. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (674 ms) belongs to the original domain Biocom.org.
Page size can be reduced by 146.0 kB (38%)
379.9 kB
233.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Biocom.org main page is 379.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 212.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 144.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 144.6 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 88 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Biocom images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 50 (85%)
59
9
The browser has sent 59 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Biocom. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 31 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
biocom.org
24 ms
www.biocom.org
64 ms
style.min.css
15 ms
style.min.css
42 ms
style.min.css
49 ms
style.min.css
38 ms
style.min.css
46 ms
style.min.css
53 ms
style.min.css
32 ms
blocks.style.build.css
49 ms
blocks.style.build.css
60 ms
style-index.css
61 ms
styles.css
61 ms
style.css
61 ms
main.css
79 ms
front-widget.css
67 ms
jquery.min.js
71 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
72 ms
google_tag_manager.js
72 ms
dc.js
151 ms
hero.css
71 ms
two_col_with_image.css
140 ms
testimonials_slider.css
140 ms
two_col_with_list.css
142 ms
events.css
141 ms
premium_members.css
140 ms
newsletter_signup.css
143 ms
index.js
141 ms
index.js
142 ms
moment.min.js
143 ms
main.bundle.js
145 ms
helper_methods_service.js
144 ms
cache_service.js
143 ms
moment-timezone-with-data.js
145 ms
data_service.js
144 ms
alert_message_service.js
145 ms
front-widget.js
145 ms
api.js
65 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
145 ms
sharethis.js
44 ms
a91cea2267.js
136 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
239 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
230 ms
index.js
215 ms
smush-lazy-load.min.js
206 ms
two_col_with_image.js
205 ms
testimonials_slider.js
207 ms
events.js
202 ms
premium_members.js
204 ms
gtm.js
302 ms
uwt.js
196 ms
insight.min.js
204 ms
Matter-Regular.woff
674 ms
Matter-SemiBold.woff
644 ms
recaptcha__en.js
71 ms
biocom_ca_primary_logo.svg
16 ms
smush-placeholder.png
17 ms
gt_super_text.woff
450 ms
Matter-RegularItalic.woff
479 ms
Matter-SemiBoldItalic.woff
490 ms
adsct
175 ms
adsct
173 ms
js
64 ms
adsct
138 ms
adsct
128 ms
logo_biocom_landscape.png
122 ms
biocom.org accessibility score
biocom.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
biocom.org SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Biocom.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Biocom.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
biocom.org
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Biocom. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: