4.7 sec in total
570 ms
3.8 sec
288 ms
Welcome to bivape.com homepage info - get ready to check Bivape best content right away, or after learning these important things about bivape.com
Online shopping for cool products at the right price. Find out what's hot and new from our online store. It's Safe Payment and Worldwide Shipping.
Visit bivape.comWe analyzed Bivape.com page load time and found that the first response time was 570 ms and then it took 4.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
bivape.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.2 s
42/100
10%
Value7.6 s
3/100
25%
Value6.3 s
42/100
10%
Value3,280 ms
2/100
30%
Value0.926
3/100
15%
Value7.8 s
45/100
10%
570 ms
918 ms
1587 ms
871 ms
979 ms
Our browser made a total of 23 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 9% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Bivape.com, 78% (18 requests) were made to Asssets.51microshop.com and 13% (3 requests) were made to Images.51microshop.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) relates to the external source Asssets.51microshop.com.
Page size can be reduced by 30.8 kB (6%)
475.2 kB
444.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Bivape.com main page is 475.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 336.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 27.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.7 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 27.4 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Bivape images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 506 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 550 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bivape.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (50%)
18
9
The browser has sent 18 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bivape. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
bivape.com
570 ms
bootstrap.min.css
918 ms
css.css
1587 ms
additive.css
871 ms
jquery.min.js
979 ms
lazysizes.min.js
869 ms
home.js
889 ms
jquery.cookie.min.js
941 ms
bootstrap.min.js
954 ms
TouchSlide.1.1.js
960 ms
admin-ajax.js
986 ms
js.js
1390 ms
PluginUit.js
972 ms
1631781557711_0.jpg
1478 ms
1631781580373_0.jpg
833 ms
1631781588571_0.jpg
833 ms
header_search_icon.png
565 ms
big-loupe.svg
230 ms
bag.png
229 ms
js.aspx
78 ms
font.woff
717 ms
font.woff
602 ms
showWindow.css
84 ms
bivape.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
bivape.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
bivape.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
ZH
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bivape.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Chinese is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Bivape.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
bivape.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Bivape. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: