Tools & Wizards About Us
blam.online screenshot

Report Summary

  • 35

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    55% of other websites

  • 71

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 36% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 78

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    39% of websites

blam.online

Blam Websites Ltd | Website Design | Digital Marketing

Page Load Speed

1.3 sec in total

First Response

72 ms

Resources Loaded

519 ms

Page Rendered

726 ms

blam.online screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Blam content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about blam.online

Blam Websites Ltd | Website design & digital marketing services for small & medium-sized businesses worldwide. Join our expert digital marketers & learn about our A.I. websites, business apps, & local...

Visit blam.online

Key Findings

We analyzed Blam.online page load time and found that the first response time was 72 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

blam.online performance score

35

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.0 s

85/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.7 s

8/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.4 s

74/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,030 ms

7/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.041

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value16.8 s

5/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

blam.online

72 ms

www.blam.online

127 ms

fbevents.js

85 ms

gtm.js

128 ms

Blam+Websites_logo_new_white_2020-1920w.png

112 ms

Our browser made a total of 36 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 17% of them (6 requests) were addressed to the original Blam.online, 50% (18 requests) were made to Lirp.cdn-website.com and 14% (5 requests) were made to Static.cdn-website.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (276 ms) relates to the external source Lirp.cdn-website.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.0 MB (32%)

Content Size

3.2 MB

After Optimization

2.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Blam.online main page is 3.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 319.5 kB

  • Original 395.5 kB
  • After minification 386.2 kB
  • After compression 76.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 319.5 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-27%

Potential reduce by 709.7 kB

  • Original 2.6 MB
  • After minification 1.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Blam needs image optimization as it can save up to 709.7 kB or 27% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 603 B

  • Original 192.0 kB
  • After minification 192.0 kB
  • After compression 191.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (39%)

Requests Now

33

After Optimization

20

  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 33 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Blam. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

blam.online

blam.online

72 ms

www.blam.online

www.blam.online

127 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

85 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

128 ms

Blam+Websites_logo_new_white_2020-1920w.png

Blam+Websites_logo_new_white_2020-1920w.png

112 ms

Blam_Logo_white-147w.png

Blam_Logo_white-147w.png

113 ms

websites-graph-4-2628ecf8-871e258e-1920w.png

websites-graph-4-2628ecf8-871e258e-1920w.png

160 ms

www.orangetreepub.co.uk-1920w.png

www.orangetreepub.co.uk-1920w.png

168 ms

Screenshot+2020-03-24+at+16.00.02-449h.png

Screenshot+2020-03-24+at+16.00.02-449h.png

115 ms

photo-1533227268428-f9ed0900fb3b-ef61b649-fa09b946-289w.jpg

photo-1533227268428-f9ed0900fb3b-ef61b649-fa09b946-289w.jpg

115 ms

man-talking-phone-18482349-289w.jpg

man-talking-phone-18482349-289w.jpg

115 ms

pexels-photo-8279501-bf596d12-289w.jpeg

pexels-photo-8279501-bf596d12-289w.jpeg

134 ms

pexels-photo-1300402-4e697df0-ce38bc8a-289w.jpeg

pexels-photo-1300402-4e697df0-ce38bc8a-289w.jpeg

226 ms

Blam+Partners_logo_new_2020-210w.png

Blam+Partners_logo_new_2020-210w.png

147 ms

svg-whatsapp.svg

svg-whatsapp.svg

133 ms

jquery-3.7.0.min.js

jquery-3.7.0.min.js

105 ms

d-js-one-runtime-unified-desktop.min.js

d-js-one-runtime-unified-desktop.min.js

124 ms

d-js-jquery-migrate.min.js

d-js-jquery-migrate.min.js

122 ms

popup.js

popup.js

24 ms

helpers.js

helpers.js

76 ms

userVisitsConditionService.js

userVisitsConditionService.js

102 ms

timeRangeConditionService.js

timeRangeConditionService.js

102 ms

rrule.min.js

rrule.min.js

118 ms

js

js

162 ms

loader.js

loader.js

121 ms

widget.js

widget.js

187 ms

CIRCLE_GREEN-b658c477-1920w.png

CIRCLE_GREEN-b658c477-1920w.png

116 ms

How+to+cut+out+all+of+the+noise-1920w.png

How+to+cut+out+all+of+the+noise-1920w.png

276 ms

FInd+your+why+thumbnail-1920w.png

FInd+your+why+thumbnail-1920w.png

130 ms

Do+you+have+no+time+thumbnail-1920w.png

Do+you+have+no+time+thumbnail-1920w.png

132 ms

Blam+Websites_logo_new_white_2020-225w.png

Blam+Websites_logo_new_white_2020-225w.png

128 ms

Blam+Partners_Square-319w.png

Blam+Partners_Square-319w.png

129 ms

GC-Partner-no_outline-H-319w.png

GC-Partner-no_outline-H-319w.png

131 ms

DM%2BCertified%2BPartner%2Bbadge-319w.png

DM%2BCertified%2BPartner%2Bbadge-319w.png

276 ms

widget_app_base_1724056634836.js

widget_app_base_1724056634836.js

87 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

13 ms

Accessibility Review

blam.online accessibility score

71

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

blam.online best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

blam.online SEO score

78

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Blam.online can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Blam.online main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

blam.online

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Blam. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: