5 sec in total
1.5 sec
2.5 sec
976 ms
Welcome to blarming.com homepage info - get ready to check Blarming best content right away, or after learning these important things about blarming.com
Blarming - To Blarm or not to Blarm. If you are not blarming and your competition is, your market share will have shrunk by the time you finish reading this
Visit blarming.comWe analyzed Blarming.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.5 sec and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
blarming.com performance score
1492 ms
101 ms
153 ms
154 ms
257 ms
Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 59% of them (33 requests) were addressed to the original Blarming.com, 20% (11 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 13% (7 requests) were made to Awesomerates.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Blarming.com.
Page size can be reduced by 237.6 kB (21%)
1.1 MB
909.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Blarming.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 926.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 56.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 56.5 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 83.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Blarming images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 89.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 89.1 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 8.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Blarming.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 8.5 kB or 78% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (40%)
52
31
The browser has sent 52 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Blarming. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
blarming.com
1492 ms
style.css
101 ms
styles.css
153 ms
social_widget.css
154 ms
jquery.js
257 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
176 ms
plusone.js
37 ms
jquery.form.min.js
190 ms
scripts.js
177 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
136 ms
plusone.js
195 ms
1blank_ActiveRain_creatures-300x300.png
366 ms
gplus-16.png
162 ms
AmerifirstFinancialIncEHO.jpg
466 ms
1286374595_Facebook_creatures.png
276 ms
1286374675_Twitter_creatures.png
275 ms
1286374737_YouTube_creatures-300x300.png
363 ms
1286374764_Feed_creatures-300x300.png
412 ms
Klout-300x300.png
417 ms
Linkedin1-300x300.png
352 ms
body.jpg
192 ms
top.jpg
353 ms
AmeriFirst-logo-high-300x72.jpg
190 ms
li2.gif
191 ms
title.jpg
191 ms
cover.jpg
190 ms
meta.jpg
295 ms
categ.gif
706 ms
comments.gif
408 ms
ar131040919133613.png
310 ms
ar131008601696582.jpg
432 ms
ar13104101971365.jpg
600 ms
ar131041007511604.jpg
452 ms
rss.jpg
434 ms
facebook.png
512 ms
twitter.png
505 ms
linkedin.png
515 ms
youtube.png
539 ms
foursquare.png
586 ms
activerain.png
603 ms
rss.png
607 ms
email.png
612 ms
2001902146.png
651 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
57 ms
fastbutton
95 ms
fastbutton
77 ms
ajax-loader.gif
605 ms
follow-me.png
615 ms
postmessageRelay
137 ms
rs=AGLTcCMmxxv5a__MjyaVcD74l1XyH_kiOQ
32 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
64 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
63 ms
W5F8_SL0XFawnjxHGsZjJA.ttf
55 ms
3193398744-postmessagerelay.js
27 ms
rpc:shindig_random.js
49 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
3 ms
blarming.com SEO score
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Blarming.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Blarming.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
blarming.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Blarming. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: