4.3 sec in total
946 ms
2.9 sec
451 ms
Visit blimunda.net now to see the best up-to-date Blimunda content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about blimunda.net
Sempre meglio che lavorare
Visit blimunda.netWe analyzed Blimunda.net page load time and found that the first response time was 946 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
blimunda.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value8.6 s
0/100
10%
Value16.5 s
0/100
25%
Value17.6 s
0/100
10%
Value760 ms
38/100
30%
Value0.478
18/100
15%
Value14.6 s
8/100
10%
946 ms
70 ms
134 ms
135 ms
136 ms
Our browser made a total of 101 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 53% of them (54 requests) were addressed to the original Blimunda.net, 13% (13 requests) were made to Scontent.cdninstagram.com and 9% (9 requests) were made to Pixel.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (946 ms) belongs to the original domain Blimunda.net.
Page size can be reduced by 656.1 kB (30%)
2.2 MB
1.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Blimunda.net main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 43.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 43.6 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 96.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Blimunda images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 278.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 278.3 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 238.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Blimunda.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 238.0 kB or 79% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 58 (63%)
92
34
The browser has sent 92 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Blimunda. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.blimunda.net
946 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
70 ms
style.css
134 ms
front.css
135 ms
sb-instagram.css
136 ms
font-awesome.min.css
19 ms
css
24 ms
style.css
136 ms
content-sidebar.css
136 ms
jquery.bxslider.css
136 ms
bootstrap.min.css
265 ms
main.css
204 ms
nivo-lightbox.css
202 ms
default.css
200 ms
genericons.css
271 ms
jetpack.css
205 ms
mediaelementplayer.css
271 ms
jquery.js
335 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
273 ms
jquery.timeago.js
272 ms
hoverIntent.min.js
329 ms
superfish.js
331 ms
bootstrap.min.js
333 ms
nivo-lightbox.min.js
334 ms
bxslider.js
334 ms
custom.js
395 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
464 ms
sb-instagram.js
399 ms
jquery.cycle.js
422 ms
slideshow-shortcode.js
399 ms
front.js
398 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
9 ms
gprofiles.js
60 ms
wpgroho.js
457 ms
navigation.js
462 ms
skip-link-focus-fix.js
463 ms
wp-embed.min.js
462 ms
sharing.js
485 ms
e-201611.js
6 ms
font-awesome.min.css
332 ms
Blimunda
231 ms
cropped-IMG_29061.jpg
504 ms
www.blimunda.net
705 ms
FullSizeRender-3-1-290x195.jpg
231 ms
10644697_10208506732571580_8610682375766371280_o-290x195.jpg
231 ms
FullSizeRender-3-290x195.jpg
232 ms
IMG_9093-290x195.jpg
230 ms
IMG_8121-290x195.jpg
280 ms
foto-2-21-290x195.jpg
232 ms
foto1-290x195.jpg
280 ms
foto-4-290x195.jpg
234 ms
unnamed-290x195.jpg
280 ms
socialmediaeditoria3.jpg
813 ms
FullSizeRender-3-1-725x400.jpg
473 ms
10644697_10208506732571580_8610682375766371280_o-725x400.jpg
560 ms
loader.png
335 ms
loading.gif
401 ms
KT3KS9Aol4WfR6Vas8kNcg.woff
37 ms
boeCNmOCCh-EWFLSfVffDg.woff
36 ms
LeFlHvsZjXu2c3ZRgBq9nD8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
193 ms
PIbvSEyHEdL91QLOQRnZ13hCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
195 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
503 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
6 ms
y7lebkjgREBJK96VQi37ZobN6UDyHWBl620a-IRfuBk.woff
196 ms
Genericons.svg
579 ms
8AAnjaY2BgYGQAgosrjpwF0ZcUq9bCaABTzgdAAAA=
4 ms
217970
194 ms
recent
365 ms
hovercard.css
61 ms
services.css
63 ms
share
114 ms
g.gif
28 ms
graph.facebook.com
103 ms
share
88 ms
graph.facebook.com
199 ms
share
110 ms
graph.facebook.com
226 ms
share
73 ms
graph.facebook.com
264 ms
bx_loader.gif
353 ms
g.gif
33 ms
g.gif
33 ms
g.gif
33 ms
g.gif
34 ms
g.gif
35 ms
g.gif
35 ms
g.gif
34 ms
g.gif
35 ms
10731754_959312177430283_182176473_a.jpg
17 ms
12224384_581670725342529_100836723_n.jpg
84 ms
12819124_587358028096396_852729056_n.jpg
14 ms
12826265_449580198582916_628254726_n.jpg
25 ms
12783289_192447304462091_1133284868_n.jpg
100 ms
12826258_1185100831501111_1352904242_n.jpg
10 ms
1390281_935485943237457_1517832945_n.jpg
56 ms
12816951_1574880816164639_265467334_n.jpg
78 ms
12825750_188548534856238_1237277919_n.jpg
131 ms
12818992_1169560786390401_1267032354_n.jpg
117 ms
12825773_970320969727895_1783916523_n.jpg
95 ms
12446088_1689442711307707_1162781005_n.jpg
144 ms
10617037_778177535647802_1693000025_n.jpg
151 ms
blimunda.net accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
blimunda.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
blimunda.net SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
IT
IT
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Blimunda.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Italian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Blimunda.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
blimunda.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Blimunda. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: