5.3 sec in total
278 ms
3.2 sec
1.8 sec
Click here to check amazing Blog Bytemark content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about blog.bytemark.co.uk
Sound bytes from the UK's hosting experts
Visit blog.bytemark.co.ukWe analyzed Blog.bytemark.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 278 ms and then it took 5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
blog.bytemark.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.4 s
72/100
10%
Value7.5 s
4/100
25%
Value4.7 s
70/100
10%
Value70 ms
99/100
30%
Value0.025
100/100
15%
Value6.2 s
63/100
10%
278 ms
513 ms
186 ms
260 ms
368 ms
Our browser made a total of 140 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 18% of them (25 requests) were addressed to the original Blog.bytemark.co.uk, 22% (31 requests) were made to Pixel.wp.com and 9% (12 requests) were made to Public.slidesharecdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) relates to the external source Slideshare.net.
Page size can be reduced by 772.6 kB (50%)
1.5 MB
777.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Blog.bytemark.co.uk main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 507.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 108.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 108.5 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 15.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Blog Bytemark images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 253.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 253.2 kB or 63% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 395.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Blog.bytemark.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 395.0 kB or 79% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 99 (74%)
134
35
The browser has sent 134 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Blog Bytemark. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 46 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
blog.bytemark.co.uk
278 ms
blog.bytemark.co.uk
513 ms
style.css
186 ms
style.css
260 ms
genericons.css
368 ms
jetpack.css
300 ms
jquery.js
488 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
308 ms
widgets.js
152 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
160 ms
gprofiles.js
222 ms
wpgroho.js
217 ms
wp-embed.min.js
255 ms
sharing.js
300 ms
e-201609.js
17 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
200 ms
y18.gif
775 ms
MdBviBeF5uw
714 ms
blog-banner-temporary2.png
1136 ms
search.png
705 ms
comment-bubble.png
711 ms
fosdem-300x159.png
759 ms
IMG_20160131_140814-300x225.jpg
758 ms
CZ985pgWAAAAAX--300x225.jpg
757 ms
simple-smile.png
758 ms
Passagiers-Terminal-Amsterdam.jpg
958 ms
rpi-disk.png
958 ms
orange-small.png
884 ms
bigv_york_colour_150ppi.png
958 ms
loading.gif
883 ms
Genericons.svg
1265 ms
8AAnjaY2BgYGQAgosrjpwF0ZcUq9bCaABTzgdAAAA=
15 ms
xHnamWKltFRAOw
1419 ms
sdk.js
773 ms
hovercard.css
183 ms
services.css
222 ms
share
278 ms
g.gif
187 ms
count.json
323 ms
graph.facebook.com
331 ms
share
331 ms
count.json
329 ms
graph.facebook.com
381 ms
share
380 ms
count.json
327 ms
graph.facebook.com
448 ms
share
372 ms
count.json
326 ms
graph.facebook.com
515 ms
share
371 ms
count.json
324 ms
graph.facebook.com
513 ms
share
370 ms
count.json
343 ms
graph.facebook.com
512 ms
share
367 ms
count.json
365 ms
graph.facebook.com
511 ms
share
365 ms
count.json
366 ms
graph.facebook.com
507 ms
share
438 ms
count.json
364 ms
graph.facebook.com
508 ms
share
426 ms
count.json
367 ms
graph.facebook.com
532 ms
timeline.1b43d11859b7663a2225b885f87704a5.js
120 ms
tweet.04d20138f67ab41d6b4af6cc583926d9.js
249 ms
www-embed-player-vflQrT_sR.css
298 ms
www-embed-player.js
360 ms
g.gif
151 ms
g.gif
151 ms
g.gif
179 ms
g.gif
179 ms
g.gif
179 ms
g.gif
241 ms
g.gif
242 ms
g.gif
241 ms
g.gif
252 ms
g.gif
253 ms
g.gif
253 ms
g.gif
255 ms
g.gif
255 ms
g.gif
254 ms
g.gif
255 ms
g.gif
256 ms
g.gif
256 ms
g.gif
284 ms
g.gif
285 ms
g.gif
284 ms
g.gif
284 ms
g.gif
285 ms
g.gif
283 ms
g.gif
315 ms
g.gif
320 ms
g.gif
315 ms
g.gif
315 ms
g.gif
318 ms
g.gif
314 ms
g.gif
317 ms
syndication
290 ms
573866179573456897
409 ms
249 ms
xd_arbiter.php
130 ms
tweets.json
235 ms
syndication
194 ms
yrK4EqpSRdoujKQmsJoZ5WaLgeULvcWnibQMQSxOOnM.js
50 ms
ad_status.js
52 ms
2UX7WLTfW3W8TclTUvlFyQ.woff
105 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
112 ms
tweet.7edb5b7c103e282bacfdf7055ee51cce.light.ltr.css
29 ms
tweet.7edb5b7c103e282bacfdf7055ee51cce.light.ltr.css
38 ms
iMkWvNrO_normal.jpeg
34 ms
timeline.4d087f49a21e27038d9769d7c976b8fa.default.css
37 ms
timeline.4d087f49a21e27038d9769d7c976b8fa.default.css
40 ms
Xm2921AM_normal.jpg
61 ms
VJpuKpTL_normal.jpg
114 ms
jot
61 ms
combined_jquery.js
93 ms
global.js
85 ms
combined_li_tracking.js
92 ms
font-awesome.css
113 ms
combined_presentation.css
119 ms
combined_player_presentation.js
127 ms
combined_old_embed.js
112 ms
combined_base.js
95 ms
ga.js
138 ms
beacon.js
97 ms
applying-leadership-thinking-to-user-experience-design-1-638.jpg
311 ms
53561004
103 ms
lead-form
115 ms
1x1.gif
31 ms
logo_embed_20x20_v1.png
26 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
33 ms
icons.svg
28 ms
status
80 ms
__utm.gif
11 ms
__utm.gif
14 ms
jot.html
28 ms
blog.bytemark.co.uk accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
blog.bytemark.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
blog.bytemark.co.uk SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Blog.bytemark.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Blog.bytemark.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
blog.bytemark.co.uk
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Blog Bytemark. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: