3.4 sec in total
118 ms
2.8 sec
500 ms
Click here to check amazing Blogging Mile content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about bloggingmile.com
Want to earn passive income? Create a blog, promote it. Scale your blog from zero, make $3k-10k in a few months. Learn more from Bharat and become your boss.
Visit bloggingmile.comWe analyzed Bloggingmile.com page load time and found that the first response time was 118 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
bloggingmile.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.4 s
6/100
10%
Value14.9 s
0/100
25%
Value9.4 s
12/100
10%
Value620 ms
48/100
30%
Value0.006
100/100
15%
Value13.3 s
12/100
10%
118 ms
15 ms
60 ms
35 ms
36 ms
Our browser made a total of 109 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (101 requests) were addressed to the original Bloggingmile.com, 4% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (377 ms) belongs to the original domain Bloggingmile.com.
Page size can be reduced by 134.3 kB (10%)
1.3 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Bloggingmile.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 628.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 133.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 133.3 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 13 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Blogging Mile images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 388 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 612 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bloggingmile.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 91 (91%)
100
9
The browser has sent 100 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Blogging Mile. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 56 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 37 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.bloggingmile.com
118 ms
webfontloader.min.js
15 ms
styles.css
60 ms
dashicons.min.css
35 ms
frontend.min.css
36 ms
woocommerce-layout.css
33 ms
woocommerce.css
35 ms
screen.min.css
71 ms
woo-checkout-for-digital-goods-public.css
36 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
53 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
76 ms
swiper.min.css
44 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
50 ms
global.css
54 ms
post-744.css
62 ms
icon.css
61 ms
frontend.css
65 ms
darkmode.css
144 ms
font-awesome.min.css
72 ms
jegicon.css
73 ms
jquery.jscrollpane.css
76 ms
okayNav.css
153 ms
magnific-popup.css
80 ms
chosen.css
82 ms
main.css
156 ms
responsive.css
95 ms
pb-temp.css
92 ms
woocommerce.css
90 ms
elementor-frontend.css
142 ms
darkmode.css
144 ms
plugin.css
146 ms
fontawesome.min.css
171 ms
brands.min.css
147 ms
solid.min.css
148 ms
regular.min.css
149 ms
v84a3a4012de94ce1a686ba8c167c359c1696973893317
76 ms
widget-icon-list.min.css
187 ms
css
87 ms
scheme.css
140 ms
jquery.min.js
138 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
167 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
136 ms
add-to-cart.min.js
135 ms
js.cookie.min.js
136 ms
woocommerce.min.js
128 ms
woo-checkout-for-digital-goods-public.js
149 ms
gtag.js
144 ms
index.js
119 ms
index.js
136 ms
ta.js
302 ms
sourcebuster.min.js
135 ms
order-attribution.min.js
130 ms
comment-reply.min.js
128 ms
hoverIntent.min.js
128 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
126 ms
isotope.js
288 ms
lazysizes.js
168 ms
ls.bgset.js
163 ms
superfish.js
118 ms
theia-sticky-sidebar.js
270 ms
jquery.waypoints.js
268 ms
jquery.scrollTo.js
266 ms
jquery.parallax.js
218 ms
jquery.okayNav.js
220 ms
jquery.mousewheel.js
217 ms
modernizr-custom.js
249 ms
jquery.smartresize.js
217 ms
chosen.jquery.js
213 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.js
245 ms
jquery.jnewsgif.js
244 ms
jquery.jsticky.js
243 ms
jquery.transit.min.js
229 ms
jquery.module.js
228 ms
main.js
373 ms
woocommerce.js
375 ms
floating-video.js
377 ms
font
195 ms
font
227 ms
font
371 ms
font
373 ms
darkmode.js
371 ms
plugin.js
370 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
355 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
358 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
350 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
349 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
353 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
351 ms
hooks.min.js
349 ms
i18n.min.js
357 ms
frontend.min.js
357 ms
waypoints.min.js
356 ms
core.min.js
349 ms
gtm.js
340 ms
frontend.min.js
306 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
305 ms
bloggingmile.png
306 ms
live-webinar-bg1.jpg
191 ms
webinar-conference-bg1.jpg
195 ms
RANK-1-GOOGLE-SEARCH-RESULTS.jpg
192 ms
build-targeted-real-traffic-blogging-mile.jpg
191 ms
high-quality-link-building-blogging-mile.jpg
192 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
216 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
217 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
217 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
216 ms
jegicon.woff
216 ms
woocommerce-smallscreen.css
100 ms
js
89 ms
bloggingmile.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
bloggingmile.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
bloggingmile.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bloggingmile.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Bloggingmile.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
bloggingmile.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Blogging Mile. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: