3.2 sec in total
555 ms
2.1 sec
515 ms
Visit blue-vertigo.net now to see the best up-to-date Blue Vertigo content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about blue-vertigo.net
Visit blue-vertigo.netWe analyzed Blue-vertigo.net page load time and found that the first response time was 555 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster. This domain responded with an error, which can significantly jeopardize Blue-vertigo.net rating and web reputation
blue-vertigo.net performance score
555 ms
252 ms
30 ms
334 ms
105 ms
Our browser made a total of 69 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 55% of them (38 requests) were addressed to the original Blue-vertigo.net, 10% (7 requests) were made to Image2.pubmatic.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Resources.infolinks.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) relates to the external source Sa.entireweb.com.
Page size can be reduced by 652.7 kB (63%)
1.0 MB
388.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Blue-vertigo.net main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 844.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 14.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 14.1 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 54.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Blue Vertigo needs image optimization as it can save up to 54.9 kB or 33% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 576.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 576.5 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 7.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Blue-vertigo.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 7.2 kB or 80% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (23%)
60
46
The browser has sent 60 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Blue Vertigo. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
blue-vertigo.net
555 ms
main.css
252 ms
brand
30 ms
logo.gif
334 ms
brand
105 ms
sense.js
262 ms
infolinks_main.js
70 ms
KonaLibInline.js
47 ms
iphoneunlock.png
476 ms
HG_220x22.gif
76 ms
Fissures-3.gif
303 ms
image.pxf
203 ms
ttdbanner.gif
456 ms
instantwebsite.jpg
317 ms
webstore.png
460 ms
estore.png
487 ms
logofun.gif
450 ms
amazon.png
469 ms
PaypalBuyNow.jpg
519 ms
bg.gif
93 ms
top-right.gif
129 ms
top-left.gif
197 ms
body-bg.gif
273 ms
left-top.gif
310 ms
left-link-bg.gif
274 ms
left-link-bottom.gif
274 ms
path-bg.gif
275 ms
path-left.gif
279 ms
path-right.gif
307 ms
body-top-bg.gif
311 ms
body-bottom-bg.gif
309 ms
1.png
309 ms
419.png
443 ms
27.png
453 ms
51.png
446 ms
142.png
448 ms
176.png
446 ms
209.png
472 ms
702.png
452 ms
257.png
459 ms
291.png
470 ms
312.png
455 ms
345.png
511 ms
377.png
566 ms
432.png
515 ms
google_custom_search_watermark.gif
63 ms
sasense35
1291 ms
user_sync.html
50 ms
usersyncup-an.html
114 ms
ice.js
217 ms
KonaHtml5.js
35 ms
showad.js
140 ms
twit7.gif
451 ms
KonaGet.js
95 ms
PugMaster
136 ms
Fissures-3.gif
472 ms
image.pxf
163 ms
footer.gif
260 ms
pm_match
61 ms
pixel
83 ms
Pug
66 ms
usersync.aspx
69 ms
Pug
57 ms
Pug
61 ms
pixel
71 ms
Pug
44 ms
Pug
52 ms
Pug
39 ms
Pug
37 ms
blue-vertigo.net SEO score
N/A
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Blue-vertigo.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Blue-vertigo.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
blue-vertigo.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Blue Vertigo. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: