Tools & Wizards About Us
bluekeeping.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 66

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    79% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

bluekeeping.com

Home of Bluekeeping

Page Load Speed

3.8 sec in total

First Response

248 ms

Resources Loaded

2.1 sec

Page Rendered

1.5 sec

bluekeeping.com screenshot

About Website

Visit bluekeeping.com now to see the best up-to-date Bluekeeping content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about bluekeeping.com

Visit bluekeeping.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Bluekeeping.com page load time and found that the first response time was 248 ms and then it took 3.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

bluekeeping.com performance score

66

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

37/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

66/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.4 s

74/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value430 ms

65/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.052

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.3 s

40/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.bluekeeping.com

248 ms

jquery-1.7.1.js

121 ms

main.min.css

217 ms

theme-overrides.min.css

235 ms

module_77499196577_offer-card.min.css

200 ms

Our browser made a total of 36 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 64% of them (23 requests) were addressed to the original Bluekeeping.com, 8% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (963 ms) belongs to the original domain Bluekeeping.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 683.8 kB (70%)

Content Size

980.0 kB

After Optimization

296.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Bluekeeping.com main page is 980.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 764.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 680.2 kB

  • Original 764.8 kB
  • After minification 758.3 kB
  • After compression 84.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 680.2 kB or 89% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 2.1 kB

  • Original 171.9 kB
  • After minification 169.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Bluekeeping images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 15 B

  • Original 33.8 kB
  • After minification 33.8 kB
  • After compression 33.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 1.6 kB

  • Original 9.6 kB
  • After minification 9.6 kB
  • After compression 8.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bluekeeping.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.6 kB or 16% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (57%)

Requests Now

30

After Optimization

13

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 30 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bluekeeping. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.bluekeeping.com

www.bluekeeping.com

248 ms

jquery-1.7.1.js

jquery-1.7.1.js

121 ms

main.min.css

main.min.css

217 ms

theme-overrides.min.css

theme-overrides.min.css

235 ms

module_77499196577_offer-card.min.css

module_77499196577_offer-card.min.css

200 ms

module_77498972994_logo-slider.min.css

module_77498972994_logo-slider.min.css

263 ms

module_77498968485_testimonial.min.css

module_77498968485_testimonial.min.css

250 ms

module_77498968487_social-follow.min.css

module_77498968487_social-follow.min.css

343 ms

css

css

99 ms

js

js

143 ms

main.min.js

main.min.js

574 ms

project.js

project.js

242 ms

tiny-slider.js

tiny-slider.js

73 ms

v2.js

v2.js

242 ms

5078666.js

5078666.js

299 ms

index.js

index.js

274 ms

amy-hanan-headshot.jpeg

amy-hanan-headshot.jpeg

149 ms

Logo%20Side-2.png

Logo%20Side-2.png

587 ms

logo-color-small-transparent.png

logo-color-small-transparent.png

585 ms

Intuit_QuickBooks_logo.png

Intuit_QuickBooks_logo.png

197 ms

tsheets-by-quickbooks-vector-logo.png

tsheets-by-quickbooks-vector-logo.png

578 ms

ServiceFusionLogo_TwoColors-RedGray.png

ServiceFusionLogo_TwoColors-RedGray.png

579 ms

Blog%20Banner%20for%20Website%20Content.png

Blog%20Banner%20for%20Website%20Content.png

555 ms

Blog%20Banner%20for%20Website%20Content%20%281%29.png

Blog%20Banner%20for%20Website%20Content%20%281%29.png

913 ms

Blog%20Banner%20for%20Website%20Content%20%283%29.png

Blog%20Banner%20for%20Website%20Content%20%283%29.png

813 ms

Logo%20Side-2.png

Logo%20Side-2.png

963 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuLyfAZ9hjQ.ttf

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuLyfAZ9hjQ.ttf

502 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuGKYAZ9hjQ.ttf

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuGKYAZ9hjQ.ttf

568 ms

-nFnOHM81r4j6k0gjAW3mujVU2B2G_Bx1w.ttf

-nFnOHM81r4j6k0gjAW3mujVU2B2G_Bx1w.ttf

619 ms

json

json

188 ms

conversations-embed.js

conversations-embed.js

258 ms

5078666.js

5078666.js

282 ms

5078666.js

5078666.js

350 ms

leadflows.js

leadflows.js

290 ms

d1bac779-5f2b-4c15-800b-68d748dbe991.json.gz

d1bac779-5f2b-4c15-800b-68d748dbe991.json.gz

178 ms

__ptq.gif

__ptq.gif

69 ms

Accessibility Review

bluekeeping.com accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

bluekeeping.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

bluekeeping.com SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bluekeeping.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Bluekeeping.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

bluekeeping.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Bluekeeping. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: