2.1 sec in total
173 ms
1.4 sec
538 ms
Welcome to blueletter.com homepage info - get ready to check Blue Letter best content right away, or after learning these important things about blueletter.com
Read and study God's Word with Bible study software that has in-depth resources such as commentaries, Greek and Hebrew word tools, concordances, and more.
Visit blueletter.comWe analyzed Blueletter.com page load time and found that the first response time was 173 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
blueletter.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.5 s
34/100
10%
Value3.5 s
63/100
25%
Value6.7 s
36/100
10%
Value1,960 ms
8/100
30%
Value0.174
69/100
15%
Value17.5 s
4/100
10%
173 ms
306 ms
35 ms
72 ms
128 ms
Our browser made a total of 116 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Blueletter.com, 78% (91 requests) were made to Blueletterbible.org and 6% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (481 ms) relates to the external source Blueletterbible.org.
Page size can be reduced by 207.0 kB (15%)
1.4 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Blueletter.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 627.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 131.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 131.9 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 241 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Blue Letter images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 73.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 73.6 kB or 17% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Blueletter.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 72 (68%)
106
34
The browser has sent 106 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Blue Letter. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
blueletter.com
173 ms
www.blueletterbible.org
306 ms
cfmessage.js
35 ms
cfajax.js
72 ms
layout-index.css
128 ms
home.css
94 ms
index_multiVerseRetrieval.css
97 ms
dfb9a03635.js
47 ms
dragula.min.js
42 ms
css
49 ms
News.css
98 ms
newItems.css
97 ms
socialNetworks.css
103 ms
activeUsers.css
123 ms
BLBTagger.css
144 ms
print.css
144 ms
yahoo-min.js
143 ms
yahoo-dom-event.js
144 ms
selector-min.js
154 ms
event-delegate-min.js
156 ms
animation-min.js
157 ms
dragdrop-min.js
158 ms
gpt.js
57 ms
base64.js
157 ms
blbEmpty.js
163 ms
blbProtoTypes.js
217 ms
blbMenu.js
215 ms
blbResponsiveMenu.js
215 ms
activeUsers.js
215 ms
indexPage.js
215 ms
multiVerseRetrieval.js
216 ms
contentTagger.js
224 ms
video.css
225 ms
video.js
226 ms
js
70 ms
MM_search.js
233 ms
dfb9a03635.css
14 ms
font-awesome-css.min.css
16 ms
pubads_impl.js
42 ms
bg.gif
81 ms
searchBtn_a.png
80 ms
menuOptionsArrowLeft.png
81 ms
menuOptionsClose_a.png
81 ms
radioOff.svg
83 ms
radioOn.svg
82 ms
checkOn.svg
84 ms
checkOff.svg
85 ms
menuOptionsArrow.png
86 ms
areYou01_a.png
165 ms
menu_arroUp.png
86 ms
blbi-logo_white-text-full.svg
87 ms
ios-appstore.svg
157 ms
google-play.svg
161 ms
sm-logo_no-tag.svg
163 ms
blbi-logo.svg
159 ms
menuMin_blbi_a.jpg
163 ms
menuMin_blbBlog_a.jpg
164 ms
knowGod01_a.png
221 ms
homeGear02_a.png
165 ms
BLB_color_stacked.svg
167 ms
BLB_color_horiz.svg
168 ms
BLB_color_icononly.svg
166 ms
fb-icon_wte_a.svg
170 ms
x-icon_wte_a.svg
170 ms
instagram-icon_wte_a.svg
170 ms
youtube-icon_wte_a.svg
171 ms
app_search_go.svg
172 ms
menuOptionsArrowTop.png
219 ms
blb_splash06.jpg
228 ms
blbFBpreview.jpg
222 ms
homeSearch_button.svg
222 ms
llyod-pulley_home_378x191.png
221 ms
bes-lxx_home_378x191.jpg
323 ms
kress-john_home_378x191.jpg
305 ms
int-translations_home_378x191.png
305 ms
activeusers-bg1.jpg
249 ms
fb-icon_a.svg
246 ms
x-icon_a.svg
246 ms
instagram-icon_a.svg
273 ms
youtube-icon_a.svg
272 ms
ecfa-logo.svg
289 ms
candid_platiunum.svg
265 ms
close-icon__blue.svg
269 ms
bible-tabs.svg
265 ms
appSearchArrowUp.svg
442 ms
copy-btn_a.svg
373 ms
linkedin-icon_a.svg
373 ms
tumblr-icon_a.svg
366 ms
close-x.svg
369 ms
pin_inactive_a.svg
367 ms
toolPopArrow.png
481 ms
close.png
480 ms
bg.png
481 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
55 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf
76 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w5aX8.ttf
77 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aX8.ttf
149 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf
155 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf
156 ms
qEd8ouDMXX8
151 ms
menuBG.png
426 ms
checkmark_unchecked.svg
425 ms
blank.cfm
375 ms
menuOptionsClose_b.png
337 ms
areYou01_b.png
338 ms
knowGod01_b.png
338 ms
homeGear02_b.png
337 ms
www-player.css
27 ms
www-embed-player.js
47 ms
base.js
71 ms
ad_status.js
157 ms
jZnaD5i84OOj95f_CaIDPNlD8clIrXO563EFyn6Jvvo.js
108 ms
embed.js
34 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
19 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
19 ms
id
37 ms
blueletter.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
blueletter.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
blueletter.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Blueletter.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Blueletter.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
blueletter.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Blue Letter. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: