5.1 sec in total
215 ms
4.6 sec
333 ms
Click here to check amazing Blue Life content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about bluelife.com
Diving in Playa del Carmen - Tulum. 5 Stars! Come see why were are the highest rated! We LOVE diving and cant wait to show you! Reef, Cave, Cenote, Cozumel
Visit bluelife.comWe analyzed Bluelife.com page load time and found that the first response time was 215 ms and then it took 4.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
bluelife.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.6 s
14/100
10%
Value19.8 s
0/100
25%
Value16.1 s
0/100
10%
Value5,250 ms
0/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value32.6 s
0/100
10%
215 ms
369 ms
264 ms
59 ms
53 ms
Our browser made a total of 103 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 96% of them (99 requests) were addressed to the original Bluelife.com, 1% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Googleadservices.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Bluelife.com.
Page size can be reduced by 258.6 kB (14%)
1.9 MB
1.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Bluelife.com main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 115.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 18.0 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 115.7 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 108.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Blue Life images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 18.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 15.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bluelife.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 15.2 kB or 12% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 72 (75%)
96
24
The browser has sent 96 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Blue Life. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 43 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 31 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
bluelife.com
215 ms
bluelife.com
369 ms
style.min.css
264 ms
style.css
59 ms
style.css
53 ms
vendors-style.css
982 ms
style.css
350 ms
styles.css
56 ms
wp-banners.css
286 ms
wp-ajax-login-public.css
62 ms
frontend.css
288 ms
yith-quick-view.css
315 ms
style.css
514 ms
magnific-popup.css
517 ms
jquery-ui.min.css
521 ms
woocommerce.css
551 ms
style.css
652 ms
icons.css
800 ms
custom-css.css
528 ms
style.css
761 ms
style.css
769 ms
wprevpro_w3.css
770 ms
wprs_unslider.css
881 ms
email-decode.min.js
754 ms
font-awesome.min.css
763 ms
animate.min.css
990 ms
tm-epo.min.css
765 ms
tm-spectrum.min.css
983 ms
owl.carousel.min.css
781 ms
owl.theme.default.min.css
792 ms
photoswipe.min.css
1004 ms
default-skin.min.css
1005 ms
scripts.js
955 ms
jquery.cycle2.min.js
1190 ms
custom-banners.js
973 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
1053 ms
add-to-cart.min.js
1005 ms
js.cookie.min.js
1217 ms
woocommerce.min.js
1189 ms
cart-fragments.min.js
978 ms
bootstrap.js
1050 ms
wp-ajax-login-public.js
1216 ms
frontend.js
1060 ms
style.css
902 ms
standard_style.css
1131 ms
frontend.min.js
1365 ms
plugins.js
1322 ms
menu.js
1167 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
760 ms
core.min.js
1162 ms
datepicker.min.js
1155 ms
theme.js
1123 ms
add-to-cart-ajax.js
1101 ms
scripts.js
1003 ms
main.js
914 ms
wprev-public.min.js
992 ms
wprs-combined.min.js
992 ms
tm-datepicker.min.js
1088 ms
tm-timepicker.min.js
906 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
1168 ms
widget.min.js
959 ms
mouse.min.js
1107 ms
slider.min.js
1047 ms
underscore.min.js
989 ms
wp-util.min.js
797 ms
tm-scripts.min.js
1148 ms
tm-epo.min.js
879 ms
add-to-cart-variation.min.js
879 ms
photoswipe.min.js
872 ms
photoswipe-ui-default.min.js
886 ms
single-product.min.js
1116 ms
rocket-loader.min.js
883 ms
logo.svg
1165 ms
cozumel3-324x324.png
1362 ms
open_water1-324x324.png
1311 ms
pit1-324x324.png
1213 ms
cozumel4-324x324.png
1429 ms
playa_carmen5-324x324.png
1325 ms
taj3-324x324.png
975 ms
hall-of-fame.svg
1213 ms
google_small_icon.png
1324 ms
1648534330_toddboychuk_60.jpg
1024 ms
1648427363_ahmadd_60.jpg
1073 ms
1647361802_yangyu_60.jpg
1049 ms
1645297133_derekvanstone_60.jpg
1129 ms
1640543377_melissaballman_60.jpg
1204 ms
1635466951_mikaelberthiaume_60.jpg
1206 ms
tripadvisor_stars_5.png
1240 ms
tripadvisor_small_icon.png
1252 ms
HelveticaNeue-Light.ttf
1699 ms
mfn-icons.woff
1071 ms
HelveticaNeue-Bold.ttf
1912 ms
wprevpro.ttf
1209 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1546 ms
waze5_icon.png
1381 ms
no_signed.png
1346 ms
portada1.png
1641 ms
0-ola-01.svg
1518 ms
js
88 ms
jquery.js
332 ms
conversion_async.js
32 ms
63 ms
30 ms
bluelife.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
bluelife.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
bluelife.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bluelife.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Bluelife.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
bluelife.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Blue Life. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: