Tools & Wizards About Us
bluemark.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 27

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    46% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

bluemark.net

Assistance Program Enrollment | Payer Audit Management

Page Load Speed

5 sec in total

First Response

909 ms

Resources Loaded

3.6 sec

Page Rendered

469 ms

bluemark.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to bluemark.net homepage info - get ready to check Bluemark best content right away, or after learning these important things about bluemark.net

Technology Firm Solving Complex Healthcare Problems Through Assistance Program Enrollment and Payer Audit Management Software.

Visit bluemark.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Bluemark.net page load time and found that the first response time was 909 ms and then it took 4.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

bluemark.net performance score

27

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value8.6 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value22.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value17.7 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value750 ms

39/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.012

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value23.5 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

bluemark.net

909 ms

bluemark.net

1772 ms

main.css

170 ms

style.min.css

343 ms

css

29 ms

Our browser made a total of 51 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (38 requests) were addressed to the original Bluemark.net, 10% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Bluemark.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.6 MB (44%)

Content Size

3.8 MB

After Optimization

2.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Bluemark.net main page is 3.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 65.0 kB

  • Original 78.3 kB
  • After minification 73.2 kB
  • After compression 13.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 65.0 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 204.9 kB

  • Original 1.7 MB
  • After minification 1.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Bluemark needs image optimization as it can save up to 204.9 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-52%

Potential reduce by 443.4 kB

  • Original 860.2 kB
  • After minification 858.7 kB
  • After compression 416.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 443.4 kB or 52% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 929.9 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB
  • After compression 145.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bluemark.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 929.9 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (47%)

Requests Now

43

After Optimization

23

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 43 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bluemark. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

bluemark.net

bluemark.net

909 ms

bluemark.net

bluemark.net

1772 ms

main.css

main.css

170 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

343 ms

css

css

29 ms

style.css

style.css

473 ms

dashicons.min.css

dashicons.min.css

228 ms

main.css

main.css

230 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

290 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

174 ms

et-core-unified-tb-50564-7-17241739323096.min.css

et-core-unified-tb-50564-7-17241739323096.min.css

231 ms

et-core-unified-7-17241739323096.min.css

et-core-unified-7-17241739323096.min.css

283 ms

jquery.du-sticky.min.js

jquery.du-sticky.min.js

233 ms

jquery.du-vertical-navigation.min.js

jquery.du-vertical-navigation.min.js

234 ms

custom.unified.js

custom.unified.js

399 ms

es6-promise.auto.min.js

es6-promise.auto.min.js

287 ms

api.js

api.js

31 ms

recaptcha.js

recaptcha.js

288 ms

common.js

common.js

290 ms

main.js

main.js

291 ms

insight.min.js

insight.min.js

185 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

184 ms

BluemarkLogo.png

BluemarkLogo.png

137 ms

HomePageHero-scaled.jpg

HomePageHero-scaled.jpg

175 ms

OA-logo-lrg-cutout-KO.png

OA-logo-lrg-cutout-KO.png

136 ms

esmd_whitepaper_cover_2.png

esmd_whitepaper_cover_2.png

320 ms

video_clip.jpg

video_clip.jpg

135 ms

blog15_pfs_stock.jpeg

blog15_pfs_stock.jpeg

206 ms

Asset-1.svg

Asset-1.svg

327 ms

Asset-5.svg

Asset-5.svg

194 ms

Mount-Sinai.svg

Mount-Sinai.svg

172 ms

wake_forest.png

wake_forest.png

205 ms

ensemble_white.png

ensemble_white.png

205 ms

Southcentral-Foundation.png

Southcentral-Foundation.png

278 ms

cpslogo_v2_white720.png

cpslogo_v2_white720.png

278 ms

utilize_tech_bm.png

utilize_tech_bm.png

279 ms

scope_edit.png

scope_edit.png

318 ms

250x250_module.png

250x250_module.png

337 ms

blog8_pfs_may21_stock.jpeg

blog8_pfs_may21_stock.jpeg

337 ms

blog5_ac_june21_stock.jpeg

blog5_ac_june21_stock.jpeg

337 ms

CTA_Background-scaled.jpg

CTA_Background-scaled.jpg

423 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

82 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf

70 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf

126 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVc.ttf

138 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf

137 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4uaVc.ttf

149 ms

modules.ttf

modules.ttf

284 ms

collect

collect

77 ms

insight_tag_errors.gif

insight_tag_errors.gif

122 ms

js

js

93 ms

Accessibility Review

bluemark.net accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

bluemark.net best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

bluemark.net SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bluemark.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Bluemark.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

bluemark.net

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Bluemark. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: