Tools & Wizards About Us
bluerosedetail.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 48

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    66% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 79

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    40% of websites

bluerosedetail.com

Auto Services – Blue Rose Auto – Eugene, OR

Page Load Speed

1.7 sec in total

First Response

34 ms

Resources Loaded

509 ms

Page Rendered

1.1 sec

bluerosedetail.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Blue Rose Detail content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about bluerosedetail.com

Whether it's for our Detail & Cleaning services, Body & Paint work, or Mechanical Repair, you can count on us to give you the best auto service experience beginning to end.

Visit bluerosedetail.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Bluerosedetail.com page load time and found that the first response time was 34 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

bluerosedetail.com performance score

48

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

65/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.6 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.2 s

92/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value600 ms

49/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.039

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.8 s

28/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

bluerosedetail.com

34 ms

blueroseauto.com

31 ms

www.blueroseauto.com

103 ms

script.js

137 ms

logo_br-blue-1920w.png

383 ms

Our browser made a total of 16 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 6% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Bluerosedetail.com, 44% (7 requests) were made to Lirp.cdn-website.com and 25% (4 requests) were made to Static.cdn-website.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (383 ms) relates to the external source Lirp.cdn-website.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 176.4 kB (23%)

Content Size

775.6 kB

After Optimization

599.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Bluerosedetail.com main page is 775.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 424.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 175.8 kB

  • Original 221.2 kB
  • After minification 216.1 kB
  • After compression 45.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 175.8 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 503 B

  • Original 424.5 kB
  • After minification 424.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Blue Rose Detail images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 109 B

  • Original 129.8 kB
  • After minification 129.8 kB
  • After compression 129.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (27%)

Requests Now

11

After Optimization

8

  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 11 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Blue Rose Detail. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

bluerosedetail.com

bluerosedetail.com

34 ms

blueroseauto.com

blueroseauto.com

31 ms

www.blueroseauto.com

www.blueroseauto.com

103 ms

script.js

script.js

137 ms

logo_br-blue-1920w.png

logo_br-blue-1920w.png

383 ms

empty_02-1920w.webp

empty_02-1920w.webp

76 ms

jquery-3.7.0.min.js

jquery-3.7.0.min.js

48 ms

d-js-one-runtime-unified-desktop.min.js

d-js-one-runtime-unified-desktop.min.js

59 ms

d-js-jquery-migrate.min.js

d-js-jquery-migrate.min.js

47 ms

Blue_Rose_Auto_Icon_1-130w.png

Blue_Rose_Auto_Icon_1-130w.png

116 ms

atf1-1920w.webp

atf1-1920w.webp

193 ms

high-quality-153w.png

high-quality-153w.png

92 ms

img_br8-720w.jpg

img_br8-720w.jpg

198 ms

img_br5-720w.jpg

img_br5-720w.jpg

242 ms

mechanic-872h.png

mechanic-872h.png

323 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

4 ms

Accessibility Review

bluerosedetail.com accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

bluerosedetail.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

bluerosedetail.com SEO score

79

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bluerosedetail.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Bluerosedetail.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

bluerosedetail.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Blue Rose Detail. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: