3.2 sec in total
315 ms
2.7 sec
176 ms
Visit bluesnapper.com now to see the best up-to-date Blue Snapper content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about bluesnapper.com
We're a digital marketing consultancy in Oxford with over 20-years experience of delivering successful digital campaigns. What can we do for you? Contact us!
Visit bluesnapper.comWe analyzed Bluesnapper.com page load time and found that the first response time was 315 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
bluesnapper.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.6 s
62/100
10%
Value6.8 s
7/100
25%
Value4.4 s
74/100
10%
Value390 ms
69/100
30%
Value0.165
71/100
15%
Value3.3 s
94/100
10%
315 ms
331 ms
411 ms
235 ms
533 ms
Our browser made a total of 24 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (16 requests) were addressed to the original Bluesnapper.com, 8% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 4% (1 request) were made to Googletagservices.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (602 ms) belongs to the original domain Bluesnapper.com.
Page size can be reduced by 688.0 kB (63%)
1.1 MB
409.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Bluesnapper.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 695.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 30.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.8 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 30.3 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Blue Snapper images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 502.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 502.4 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 152.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bluesnapper.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 152.6 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (55%)
20
9
The browser has sent 20 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Blue Snapper. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
bluesnapper.com
315 ms
ZYxRCoAgEEQvlG5SF9LVSDEtVyk7fWEEQZ_z5s0I0CmujGap485UPAwBEjX6wMa6HrBQjos9E9iAzVG-mG_BcLZeA-XqzW_gCCYZsN534LZiUuVvZoIPfLwA.css
331 ms
M9bPKixNLarUMYYydHMz04sSS1L1cjPzdAz0k0uLS_JzM6uK9DPzkvWzivVz81NSi_KAAiAFAA.js
411 ms
jquery.js
235 ms
jquery.js
533 ms
dYxBDsIwDAQ_RGJQ86HGNcJVHQfHEYTXA5W40ePMjjYBqggVD0Z1G1G4nCbo_NFGO50Be3MVfhlwQVgbZFVvbnM9ChxDQ-Pq7ai46baQ_Vuuc8GR9QnrvZON-ONwiVNM-1-CRw0kmZYvvgE.js
250 ms
M9RPy8lPLMnMS9ctzk_OTMzRTUos0s8q1k8rTgIA.js
171 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
194 ms
gpt.js
38 ms
blue_snapper_strap-2001.gif
271 ms
ecomm-FINAL.jpg
483 ms
seo-home-1200x500.jpg
602 ms
ppc-FINAL1.jpg
378 ms
fsb-sprite.png
270 ms
genericons-regular-webfont.woff
249 ms
pubads_impl_82.js
14 ms
container.html
178 ms
gtm.js
153 ms
admin-ajax.php
381 ms
javascript.gp
209 ms
analytics.js
28 ms
collect
14 ms
cookieControl-5.1.min.js
343 ms
widget_v2.134.js
16 ms
bluesnapper.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
bluesnapper.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
bluesnapper.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bluesnapper.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Bluesnapper.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
bluesnapper.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Blue Snapper. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: