1.1 sec in total
101 ms
946 ms
58 ms
Visit bluewave.tech now to see the best up-to-date BLUEWAVE content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about bluewave.tech
Keep everything clean smelling and bacteria-free with in minutes the BLUEWAVE: cranial helmets, prosthetic liners, shoes, AFOs, and more!
Visit bluewave.techWe analyzed Bluewave.tech page load time and found that the first response time was 101 ms and then it took 1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
bluewave.tech performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.1 s
46/100
10%
Value7.1 s
5/100
25%
Value9.1 s
14/100
10%
Value1,010 ms
27/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value21.8 s
1/100
10%
101 ms
35 ms
33 ms
34 ms
192 ms
Our browser made a total of 49 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Bluewave.tech, 24% (12 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 24% (12 requests) were made to Sentry-next.wixpress.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (575 ms) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (67%)
1.7 MB
556.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Bluewave.tech main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 1.1 MB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 1.1 MB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 18.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, BLUEWAVE needs image optimization as it can save up to 18.6 kB or 24% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 16.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (31%)
35
24
The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of BLUEWAVE. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.mybluewave.com
101 ms
minified.js
35 ms
focus-within-polyfill.js
33 ms
polyfill.min.js
34 ms
launch-fdc96d638967.min.js
192 ms
thunderbolt-commons.2ae1974e.bundle.min.js
156 ms
main.8ce05abc.bundle.min.js
156 ms
main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js
139 ms
lodash.min.js
155 ms
react.production.min.js
139 ms
react-dom.production.min.js
142 ms
siteTags.bundle.min.js
154 ms
secondary-logo-1.png
278 ms
bundle.min.js
81 ms
6a6180_9e8dc964c3eb4692ba930df26f8336e9~mv2.jpg
369 ms
inserts%202.png
179 ms
inserts%202.png
181 ms
_In%20all%20scenarios%20there%20has%20been%20a%20signi.png
179 ms
inserts%202.png
178 ms
inserts%202.png
184 ms
inserts%202.png
182 ms
inserts%202.png
183 ms
inserts%202.png
185 ms
_In%20all%20scenarios%20there%20has%20been%20a%20significant%20improvement%20noticeable%20by%20both%20the%20technici.png
190 ms
6a6180_f13581bb4ee847139cfb1617ba36b07f~mv2.jpg
447 ms
6a6180_4a069e9475764960834803b5275e05fc~mv2.png
187 ms
Edited%203%20technicians%20photo.jpg
525 ms
Edited%20Madelyn%20%20Working.jpg
481 ms
brittany_edited.jpg
383 ms
staff.jpg
433 ms
6a6180_d71b36352f624195be7e9349c8d7f715~mv2.jpg
575 ms
secondary-logo-1%20(1).png
521 ms
158 ms
159 ms
156 ms
165 ms
155 ms
152 ms
264 ms
195 ms
195 ms
263 ms
260 ms
259 ms
file.woff
269 ms
deprecation-en.v5.html
8 ms
bolt-performance
27 ms
deprecation-style.v5.css
7 ms
right-arrow.svg
4 ms
bluewave.tech accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
bluewave.tech best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
bluewave.tech SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bluewave.tech can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Bluewave.tech main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
bluewave.tech
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of BLUEWAVE. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: