Report Summary

  • 47

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    66% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 72% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    84% of websites

Page Load Speed

826 ms in total

First Response

134 ms

Resources Loaded

578 ms

Page Rendered

114 ms

bnewater.org screenshot

About Website

Welcome to bnewater.org homepage info - get ready to check Bnewater best content right away, or after learning these important things about bnewater.org

Visit bnewater.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Bnewater.org page load time and found that the first response time was 134 ms and then it took 692 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

bnewater.org performance score

47

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

25/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.0 s

32/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value330 ms

75/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.4 s

39/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

bnewater.org

134 ms

www.bne.org

225 ms

style.css

50 ms

responsive.css

91 ms

jquery.min.js

70 ms

Our browser made a total of 8 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 13% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Bnewater.org, 75% (6 requests) were made to Bne.org and 13% (1 request) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (225 ms) relates to the external source Bne.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 9.2 kB (36%)

Content Size

25.9 kB

After Optimization

16.7 kB

In fact, the total size of Bnewater.org main page is 25.9 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 15.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-63%

Potential reduce by 1.6 kB

  • Original 2.6 kB
  • After minification 2.4 kB
  • After compression 968 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 1.6 kB or 63% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 1.5 kB

  • Original 15.2 kB
  • After minification 13.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Bnewater images are well optimized though.

CSS Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 6.1 kB

  • Original 8.1 kB
  • After minification 7.2 kB
  • After compression 2.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bnewater.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 6.1 kB or 75% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

6

After Optimization

6

The browser has sent 6 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bnewater. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

bnewater.org accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best Practices

bnewater.org best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

bnewater.org SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bnewater.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Bnewater.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Bnewater. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: