Tools & Wizards About Us
boardevaluations.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 27

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    46% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

boardevaluations.com

Board Evaluations For Highly Effective Boards | Nasdaq

Page Load Speed

1.7 sec in total

First Response

78 ms

Resources Loaded

538 ms

Page Rendered

1.1 sec

boardevaluations.com screenshot

About Website

Visit boardevaluations.com now to see the best up-to-date Board Evaluations content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about boardevaluations.com

Nasdaq's board assessments technology creates an effective board of directors’ & committee evaluation process. Learn about our Board Evaluations.

Visit boardevaluations.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Boardevaluations.com page load time and found that the first response time was 78 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

boardevaluations.com performance score

27

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

33/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.2 s

11/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.5 s

26/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,450 ms

15/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.118

85/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.7 s

6/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

board-evaluations

78 ms

board-evaluations

27 ms

otSDKStub.js

28 ms

google_tag.script.js

14 ms

css_HMSxQYI5s_BUzWZkqL-nVksKdAZqxo6K-XVj7yQ2h9g.css

23 ms

Our browser made a total of 38 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Boardevaluations.com, 8% (3 requests) were made to Cdn.cookielaw.org and 3% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (184 ms) relates to the external source Nasdaq.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 990.5 kB (39%)

Content Size

2.6 MB

After Optimization

1.6 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Boardevaluations.com main page is 2.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 233.8 kB

  • Original 270.5 kB
  • After minification 214.2 kB
  • After compression 36.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 56.3 kB, which is 21% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 233.8 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 41.8 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Board Evaluations images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-42%

Potential reduce by 237.9 kB

  • Original 564.3 kB
  • After minification 564.3 kB
  • After compression 326.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 237.9 kB or 42% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 477.0 kB

  • Original 546.3 kB
  • After minification 544.4 kB
  • After compression 69.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Boardevaluations.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 477.0 kB or 87% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (20%)

Requests Now

35

After Optimization

28

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Board Evaluations. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

board-evaluations

board-evaluations

78 ms

board-evaluations

board-evaluations

27 ms

otSDKStub.js

otSDKStub.js

28 ms

google_tag.script.js

google_tag.script.js

14 ms

css_HMSxQYI5s_BUzWZkqL-nVksKdAZqxo6K-XVj7yQ2h9g.css

css_HMSxQYI5s_BUzWZkqL-nVksKdAZqxo6K-XVj7yQ2h9g.css

23 ms

css_r9IezT9ih0xll2c9ipJsOw65crPXksS7P-UklJybPqo.css

css_r9IezT9ih0xll2c9ipJsOw65crPXksS7P-UklJybPqo.css

35 ms

js_bcwXjT2Lru76imcO0PDVveNasAJrb6zvZsiN4fysEtw.js

js_bcwXjT2Lru76imcO0PDVveNasAJrb6zvZsiN4fysEtw.js

23 ms

eu_cookie_compliance.min.js

eu_cookie_compliance.min.js

17 ms

js_LAty7dEETv6OOShGsZATRwTxFf_MQxUKpWSesbciabM.js

js_LAty7dEETv6OOShGsZATRwTxFf_MQxUKpWSesbciabM.js

23 ms

578a06dd-f15c-46aa-8b1d-7dfe08fd6747.json

578a06dd-f15c-46aa-8b1d-7dfe08fd6747.json

77 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

95 ms

D%26OQBanner_0.jpeg

D%26OQBanner_0.jpeg

112 ms

ActionPoints-01.png

ActionPoints-01.png

40 ms

nasdaq-plus.svg

nasdaq-plus.svg

43 ms

boardeval2.jpeg

boardeval2.jpeg

59 ms

boardeval3.jpeg

boardeval3.jpeg

46 ms

Byron%20Loflin%20Headshot.jpg

Byron%20Loflin%20Headshot.jpg

57 ms

Phil%20Neiswender%20Headshot%20Edit_CS_2%20%281%29.jpg

Phil%20Neiswender%20Headshot%20Edit_CS_2%20%281%29.jpg

59 ms

Kaley%20Karaffa%20Headshot_0.jpg

Kaley%20Karaffa%20Headshot_0.jpg

100 ms

James-Beasley_0.jpg

James-Beasley_0.jpg

62 ms

Number%209%20-%20SFP%20Headshot_0.jpg

Number%209%20-%20SFP%20Headshot_0.jpg

82 ms

BE%20Number%2011%20-%200276-Q22_Finals-02.png

BE%20Number%2011%20-%200276-Q22_Finals-02.png

62 ms

Overview-3%20A%20well-executed%20evaluation%20drives%20board%20excellence.png

Overview-3%20A%20well-executed%20evaluation%20drives%20board%20excellence.png

81 ms

BE%20Number%2012%20-%200276-Q22_Finals-04.png

BE%20Number%2012%20-%200276-Q22_Finals-04.png

97 ms

Overview-4%20A%20cost-effective%20third%20party%20facilitator.png

Overview-4%20A%20cost-effective%20third%20party%20facilitator.png

97 ms

BE%20Number%2013%20-%200276-Q22_Finals-03.png

BE%20Number%2013%20-%200276-Q22_Finals-03.png

97 ms

Overview-5%20Measurable%20results%20and%20actionable%20insights%20for%20boards.png

Overview-5%20Measurable%20results%20and%20actionable%20insights%20for%20boards.png

98 ms

Number%2014%20-%20AdobeStock_220104112.jpeg

Number%2014%20-%20AdobeStock_220104112.jpeg

106 ms

Number%2015%20-%20AdobeStock_316760692.jpeg

Number%2015%20-%20AdobeStock_316760692.jpeg

106 ms

Number%2016%20-%20AdobeStock_278370910.jpeg

Number%2016%20-%20AdobeStock_278370910.jpeg

107 ms

Number%2024%20-%20AdobeStock_305938477.jpeg

Number%2024%20-%20AdobeStock_305938477.jpeg

109 ms

07_bp_software.png

07_bp_software.png

109 ms

08_measure_improve.png

08_measure_improve.png

124 ms

09_promote_efficiency.png

09_promote_efficiency.png

184 ms

10_increase_transparency.png

10_increase_transparency.png

116 ms

location

location

39 ms

otBannerSdk.js

otBannerSdk.js

20 ms

nasdaq-icons.woff

nasdaq-icons.woff

31 ms

Accessibility Review

boardevaluations.com accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

boardevaluations.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

boardevaluations.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Boardevaluations.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Boardevaluations.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

boardevaluations.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Board Evaluations. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: