4.4 sec in total
388 ms
3.1 sec
915 ms
Visit bocs.de now to see the best up-to-date BOCS content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about bocs.de
BOCS – specialized in seatransports from Europe to the Mauritania – Angola – Range and vice versa, including pre- and oncarriage from and to major destinations in Europe and West Africa.
Visit bocs.deWe analyzed Bocs.de page load time and found that the first response time was 388 ms and then it took 4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
bocs.de performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.4 s
70/100
10%
Value21.5 s
0/100
25%
Value7.3 s
29/100
10%
Value70 ms
99/100
30%
Value0.241
52/100
15%
Value6.4 s
59/100
10%
388 ms
260 ms
177 ms
182 ms
182 ms
Our browser made a total of 95 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (89 requests) were addressed to the original Bocs.de, 6% (6 requests) were made to Docs-bocs.de. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Bocs.de.
Page size can be reduced by 6.3 MB (12%)
52.5 MB
46.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Bocs.de main page is 52.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 52.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 97.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 19.1 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 97.3 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 6.2 MB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, BOCS needs image optimization as it can save up to 6.2 MB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 12.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 3.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bocs.de has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (34%)
94
62
The browser has sent 94 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of BOCS. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
bocs.de
388 ms
bootstrap.css
260 ms
animate.css
177 ms
style.css
182 ms
bg-slide.css
182 ms
twentytwenty.css
185 ms
cubeportfolio.css
186 ms
main1.css
266 ms
bocs.png
357 ms
bocsmenue.png
308 ms
iconfleet.png
308 ms
iconschedule.png
309 ms
iconvideo.png
343 ms
iconabout.png
354 ms
linkedin_white.svg
358 ms
linkedin_color.svg
366 ms
about_1V2.jpg
644 ms
about_2V2.jpg
598 ms
index.php
1234 ms
strichcode_bocscode_white.png
439 ms
509_foto_%2A_2.jpg
1067 ms
509_foto1_%2A_2.png
1070 ms
331_foto1_%2A_1.png
2743 ms
jquery-2.js
457 ms
bootstrap.js
552 ms
jquery_004.js
603 ms
jquery_011.js
640 ms
jquery_008.js
656 ms
waypoints.js
690 ms
waypoints-sticky.js
731 ms
jquery_009.js
750 ms
jquery_010.js
777 ms
ytv.js
821 ms
jquery_005.js
841 ms
jquery.js
864 ms
jquery_012.js
911 ms
jquery_002.js
936 ms
cookieconsent.min.css
951 ms
jquery_007.js
910 ms
jquery_003.js
933 ms
main1.js
944 ms
jquery_006.js
1002 ms
scripts.js
999 ms
functions.js
927 ms
cookieconsent.min.js
906 ms
1.jpg
986 ms
2.jpg
945 ms
3.jpg
954 ms
4.jpg
1190 ms
5.jpg
1130 ms
6.jpg
989 ms
bocs2.png
995 ms
services_background.jpg
1186 ms
137_foto.png
992 ms
bullauge.png
898 ms
iconteam.png
928 ms
423_foto_%2A_1.png
899 ms
428_foto_%2A.png
934 ms
433_foto_%2A.png
929 ms
fahrplan.css
327 ms
bootstrap.min.css
443 ms
bootstrap-icons.min.css
330 ms
jquery.min.js
453 ms
534_foto_%2A.png
900 ms
481_foto_%2A.png
887 ms
591_foto_%2A_1.png
872 ms
438_foto_%2A.png
858 ms
522_foto_%2A_1.png
873 ms
492_foto_%2A_1.png
854 ms
587_foto_%2A.png
810 ms
535_foto_%2A.png
807 ms
505_foto_%2A_1.png
818 ms
542_foto_%2A.png
802 ms
595_foto_%2A.png
783 ms
458_foto_%2A.png
772 ms
462_foto_%2A.png
745 ms
593_foto_%2A_1.png
781 ms
466_foto_%2A.png
802 ms
597_foto_%2A.png
778 ms
476_foto_%2A.png
770 ms
502_foto_%2A.png
718 ms
474_foto_%2A.png
764 ms
486_foto_%2A.png
778 ms
556_foto_%2A.png
753 ms
bootstrap.bundle.min.js
115 ms
560_foto_%2A.png
734 ms
550_foto_%2A.png
726 ms
547_foto_%2A.png
752 ms
553_foto_%2A.png
725 ms
564_foto_%2A.png
720 ms
183_bild_%2A.png
643 ms
212_bild_%2A_1.png
632 ms
214_bild_%2A.png
655 ms
311_bild_%2A.png
633 ms
kontakt.jpg
634 ms
bocs.de accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
bocs.de best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
bocs.de SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
DE
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bocs.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed German language. Our system also found out that Bocs.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
bocs.de
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of BOCS. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: