Tools & Wizards About Us
bodyfatanalyzer.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 14

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    26% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 99

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    93% of websites

bodyfatanalyzer.org

The Evolution of Global Dietary Trends – Peakmet AI Blog

Page Load Speed

5.9 sec in total

First Response

299 ms

Resources Loaded

3.9 sec

Page Rendered

1.7 sec

bodyfatanalyzer.org screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Bodyfatanalyzer content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about bodyfatanalyzer.org

Body Fat Analyzer Scale Meter & Monitor Reviews. Compare brands to find most accurate scale & best body composition scale for {Body Fat Percentage} fat loss

Visit bodyfatanalyzer.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Bodyfatanalyzer.org page load time and found that the first response time was 299 ms and then it took 5.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

bodyfatanalyzer.org performance score

14

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

18/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.0 s

27/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value23.7 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value43,020 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.316

37/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value56.8 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

bodyfatanalyzer.org

299 ms

4h4l.css

42 ms

4oy74.css

28 ms

css

27 ms

8ib5t.js

79 ms

Our browser made a total of 57 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 16% of them (9 requests) were addressed to the original Bodyfatanalyzer.org, 16% (9 requests) were made to I0.wp.com and 12% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) relates to the external source I1.wp.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 417.1 kB (54%)

Content Size

773.4 kB

After Optimization

356.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Bodyfatanalyzer.org main page is 773.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 425.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 77.3 kB

  • Original 100.4 kB
  • After minification 99.4 kB
  • After compression 23.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 77.3 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 3.1 kB

  • Original 115.8 kB
  • After minification 112.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Bodyfatanalyzer images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-19%

Potential reduce by 24.5 kB

  • Original 132.2 kB
  • After minification 132.2 kB
  • After compression 107.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 24.5 kB or 19% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 312.2 kB

  • Original 425.1 kB
  • After minification 424.9 kB
  • After compression 112.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bodyfatanalyzer.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 312.2 kB or 73% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (38%)

Requests Now

48

After Optimization

30

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bodyfatanalyzer. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

bodyfatanalyzer.org

bodyfatanalyzer.org

299 ms

4h4l.css

4h4l.css

42 ms

4oy74.css

4oy74.css

28 ms

css

css

27 ms

8ib5t.js

8ib5t.js

79 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

78 ms

devicepx-jetpack.js

devicepx-jetpack.js

93 ms

gprofiles.js

gprofiles.js

101 ms

e-202238.js

e-202238.js

101 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

67 ms

animate.css

animate.css

85 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

236 ms

Body-Fat-Scale-Reviews.jpg

Body-Fat-Scale-Reviews.jpg

351 ms

BuyNowAmazon.jpg

BuyNowAmazon.jpg

440 ms

EatSmart-Precision-GetFit-Scale-75x75-1.jpg

EatSmart-Precision-GetFit-Scale-75x75-1.jpg

375 ms

NdjXBqX4WPI

NdjXBqX4WPI

478 ms

Omron-Fat-Loss-Monitor.jpg

Omron-Fat-Loss-Monitor.jpg

383 ms

Weight-Gurus-Digital-Bathroom-Scale.jpg

Weight-Gurus-Digital-Bathroom-Scale.jpg

382 ms

Omron-Fat-Loss-Monitor.jpg

Omron-Fat-Loss-Monitor.jpg

442 ms

BODY-FAT-RANGES-MEN-AND-WOMEN.png

BODY-FAT-RANGES-MEN-AND-WOMEN.png

1556 ms

cropped-Body-Fat-Analyzer-Logo.png

cropped-Body-Fat-Analyzer-Logo.png

143 ms

gray.png

gray.png

142 ms

yellow.png

yellow.png

142 ms

symbol-defs.svg

symbol-defs.svg

204 ms

Withings-WS-50-Smart-Body-Analyzer.jpg

Withings-WS-50-Smart-Body-Analyzer.jpg

333 ms

Tanita-Ironman-InnerScan-Body-Composition-Monitor.jpg

Tanita-Ironman-InnerScan-Body-Composition-Monitor.jpg

265 ms

Fitbit-Aria-WiFi-Smart-Scale.jpg

Fitbit-Aria-WiFi-Smart-Scale.jpg

363 ms

Withings-WS-50-Smart-Body-Analyzer.jpg

Withings-WS-50-Smart-Body-Analyzer.jpg

362 ms

EatSmart-Scale.jpg

EatSmart-Scale.jpg

362 ms

Fitbit-Aria-WiFi-Smart-Scale.jpg

Fitbit-Aria-WiFi-Smart-Scale.jpg

361 ms

Tanita-Ironman-InnerScan-Body-Composition-Monitor.jpg

Tanita-Ironman-InnerScan-Body-Composition-Monitor.jpg

360 ms

Weight-Gurus-Smartphone-Connected-Digital-Body-Fat-Scale.jpg

Weight-Gurus-Smartphone-Connected-Digital-Body-Fat-Scale.jpg

512 ms

Omron-Body-Composition-Monitor-w-Scale.jpg

Omron-Body-Composition-Monitor-w-Scale.jpg

361 ms

check-price-on-amazon-button.png

check-price-on-amazon-button.png

511 ms

Omron-Body-Composition-Monitor-w-Scale.jpg

Omron-Body-Composition-Monitor-w-Scale.jpg

445 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

457 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

380 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

197 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

266 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtzpbCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtzpbCIPrQ.ttf

285 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCIPrQ.ttf

341 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrQ.ttf

341 ms

-cjheIgfBto

-cjheIgfBto

413 ms

www-player.css

www-player.css

358 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

429 ms

base.js

base.js

546 ms

fetch-polyfill.js

fetch-polyfill.js

136 ms

cookie.js

cookie.js

594 ms

integrator.js

integrator.js

589 ms

ads

ads

747 ms

ad_status.js

ad_status.js

735 ms

ads

ads

860 ms

embed.js

embed.js

312 ms

Y-zeT9jJ33tCNYTX0Kw8-3I-ogsAM9wZgys9W8554e8.js

Y-zeT9jJ33tCNYTX0Kw8-3I-ogsAM9wZgys9W8554e8.js

428 ms

id

id

82 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

306 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

306 ms

Accessibility Review

bodyfatanalyzer.org accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

bodyfatanalyzer.org best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

bodyfatanalyzer.org SEO score

99

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bodyfatanalyzer.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Bodyfatanalyzer.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

bodyfatanalyzer.org

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Bodyfatanalyzer. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: