Tools & Wizards About Us
bodyline.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 51

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    69% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 67% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    84% of websites

bodyline.com

Back-Huggar | Lumbar Support Cushion For Back Pain

Page Load Speed

2.1 sec in total

First Response

321 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

264 ms

bodyline.com screenshot

About Website

Visit bodyline.com now to see the best up-to-date Bodyline content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about bodyline.com

The Back-Huggar is now the leading premium lumbar support cushion, with more than 3.5 million sold throughout the world. Order yours online or call today!

Visit bodyline.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Bodyline.com page load time and found that the first response time was 321 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

bodyline.com performance score

51

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

48/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.1 s

5/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.1 s

62/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value410 ms

66/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.2 s

40/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.bodyline.com

321 ms

common.css

120 ms

layout.css

125 ms

input.css

130 ms

site.css

127 ms

Our browser made a total of 48 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (45 requests) were addressed to the original Bodyline.com, 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (417 ms) belongs to the original domain Bodyline.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 404.0 kB (44%)

Content Size

918.1 kB

After Optimization

514.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Bodyline.com main page is 918.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 420.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 46.6 kB

  • Original 57.6 kB
  • After minification 57.1 kB
  • After compression 11.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 46.6 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 14.4 kB

  • Original 420.0 kB
  • After minification 405.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Bodyline images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 295.0 kB

  • Original 380.3 kB
  • After minification 297.7 kB
  • After compression 85.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 295.0 kB or 78% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 48.0 kB

  • Original 60.3 kB
  • After minification 53.7 kB
  • After compression 12.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bodyline.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 48.0 kB or 80% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (66%)

Requests Now

47

After Optimization

16

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 47 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bodyline. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.bodyline.com

www.bodyline.com

321 ms

common.css

common.css

120 ms

layout.css

layout.css

125 ms

input.css

input.css

130 ms

site.css

site.css

127 ms

pageelements.css

pageelements.css

127 ms

preview.css

preview.css

131 ms

prototype.js

prototype.js

256 ms

effects.js

effects.js

200 ms

server.js

server.js

194 ms

bounds.js

bounds.js

200 ms

tip.js

tip.js

191 ms

touch.js

touch.js

191 ms

site.js

site.js

278 ms

webservices.js

webservices.js

277 ms

order.js

order.js

279 ms

customer.js

customer.js

279 ms

product.js

product.js

280 ms

stats.js

stats.js

417 ms

menu.js

menu.js

317 ms

form.js

form.js

333 ms

table.js

table.js

320 ms

expand.js

expand.js

324 ms

action.js

action.js

330 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

5 ms

logoonly.img

logoonly.img

198 ms

sitenavigation.img

sitenavigation.img

196 ms

sitenavigation.img

sitenavigation.img

192 ms

sitenavigation.img

sitenavigation.img

196 ms

sitenavigation.img

sitenavigation.img

192 ms

sitenavigation.img

sitenavigation.img

193 ms

thumbnail.img

thumbnail.img

201 ms

thumbnail.img

thumbnail.img

261 ms

thumbnail.img

thumbnail.img

196 ms

thumbnail.img

thumbnail.img

200 ms

thumbnail.img

thumbnail.img

197 ms

bh_traditional_blue.jpg

bh_traditional_blue.jpg

198 ms

IBB1.jpg

IBB1.jpg

375 ms

ga.js

ga.js

181 ms

1458476993250

1458476993250

164 ms

Nav-3.jpg

Nav-3.jpg

166 ms

nav-selected.jpg

nav-selected.jpg

82 ms

doctors-button2.png

doctors-button2.png

81 ms

bg-button1.jpg

bg-button1.jpg

175 ms

home-image.jpg

home-image.jpg

382 ms

my-button.jpg

my-button.jpg

134 ms

cards.jpg

cards.jpg

199 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

38 ms

Accessibility Review

bodyline.com accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

bodyline.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

bodyline.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bodyline.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Bodyline.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

bodyline.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Bodyline. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: