2.1 sec in total
321 ms
1.5 sec
264 ms
Visit bodyline.com now to see the best up-to-date Bodyline content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about bodyline.com
The Back-Huggar is now the leading premium lumbar support cushion, with more than 3.5 million sold throughout the world. Order yours online or call today!
Visit bodyline.comWe analyzed Bodyline.com page load time and found that the first response time was 321 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
bodyline.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.1 s
48/100
10%
Value7.1 s
5/100
25%
Value5.1 s
62/100
10%
Value410 ms
66/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value8.2 s
40/100
10%
321 ms
120 ms
125 ms
130 ms
127 ms
Our browser made a total of 48 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (45 requests) were addressed to the original Bodyline.com, 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (417 ms) belongs to the original domain Bodyline.com.
Page size can be reduced by 404.0 kB (44%)
918.1 kB
514.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Bodyline.com main page is 918.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 420.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 46.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 46.6 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 14.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Bodyline images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 295.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 295.0 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 48.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bodyline.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 48.0 kB or 80% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (66%)
47
16
The browser has sent 47 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bodyline. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.bodyline.com
321 ms
common.css
120 ms
layout.css
125 ms
input.css
130 ms
site.css
127 ms
pageelements.css
127 ms
preview.css
131 ms
prototype.js
256 ms
effects.js
200 ms
server.js
194 ms
bounds.js
200 ms
tip.js
191 ms
touch.js
191 ms
site.js
278 ms
webservices.js
277 ms
order.js
279 ms
customer.js
279 ms
product.js
280 ms
stats.js
417 ms
menu.js
317 ms
form.js
333 ms
table.js
320 ms
expand.js
324 ms
action.js
330 ms
jquery.min.js
5 ms
logoonly.img
198 ms
sitenavigation.img
196 ms
sitenavigation.img
192 ms
sitenavigation.img
196 ms
sitenavigation.img
192 ms
sitenavigation.img
193 ms
thumbnail.img
201 ms
thumbnail.img
261 ms
thumbnail.img
196 ms
thumbnail.img
200 ms
thumbnail.img
197 ms
bh_traditional_blue.jpg
198 ms
IBB1.jpg
375 ms
ga.js
181 ms
1458476993250
164 ms
Nav-3.jpg
166 ms
nav-selected.jpg
82 ms
doctors-button2.png
81 ms
bg-button1.jpg
175 ms
home-image.jpg
382 ms
my-button.jpg
134 ms
cards.jpg
199 ms
__utm.gif
38 ms
bodyline.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
bodyline.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
bodyline.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't use legible font sizes
EN
N/A
ISO8859-1
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bodyline.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Bodyline.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
bodyline.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Bodyline. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: