5.7 sec in total
1 sec
3.9 sec
813 ms
Visit bodymakeovers.com now to see the best up-to-date Body Makeover S content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about bodymakeovers.com
Visit bodymakeovers.comWe analyzed Bodymakeovers.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1 sec and then it took 4.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
bodymakeovers.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.6 s
13/100
10%
Value26.6 s
0/100
25%
Value11.2 s
5/100
10%
Value480 ms
60/100
30%
Value0.382
27/100
15%
Value17.4 s
4/100
10%
1009 ms
187 ms
250 ms
126 ms
41 ms
Our browser made a total of 102 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (92 requests) were addressed to the original Bodymakeovers.com, 5% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Bodymakeovers.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.8 MB (23%)
7.9 MB
6.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Bodymakeovers.com main page is 7.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 6.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 80.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 80.8 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 495.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Body Makeover S images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 687.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 687.5 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 552.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bodymakeovers.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 552.8 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 59 (62%)
95
36
The browser has sent 95 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Body Makeover S. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 38 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 23 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.bodymakeovers.com
1009 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
187 ms
formidablepro.css
250 ms
youtube-live-style.css
126 ms
css
41 ms
style.css
126 ms
shortcodes.css
190 ms
shortcodes_responsive.css
187 ms
flipclock.css
188 ms
webinar.css
218 ms
css
52 ms
icons.css
244 ms
font-awesome.min.css
307 ms
buttons.min.css
260 ms
dashicons.min.css
310 ms
mediaelementplayer.min.css
278 ms
wp-mediaelement.css
305 ms
media-views.min.css
364 ms
imgareaselect.css
311 ms
thickbox.css
338 ms
baze_styles_youtube.css
368 ms
jquery.js
549 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
368 ms
core.min.js
370 ms
ZeroClipboard.min.js
399 ms
addEvent.js
423 ms
front-end.js
424 ms
flipclock.min.js
427 ms
platform.js
71 ms
utils.min.js
426 ms
plupload.full.min.js
581 ms
youtube_embed_front_end.js
484 ms
iframe_api
54 ms
main-styles.css
617 ms
frontend-builder-style.css
684 ms
flexslider.css
344 ms
public.css
401 ms
frontend-builder-global-functions.js
409 ms
custom.js
461 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
463 ms
waypoints.min.js
470 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.js
496 ms
frontend-builder-scripts.js
644 ms
underscore.min.js
497 ms
shortcode.min.js
501 ms
backbone.min.js
524 ms
wp-util.min.js
559 ms
wp-backbone.min.js
535 ms
media-models.min.js
523 ms
wp-plupload.min.js
548 ms
widget.min.js
544 ms
mouse.min.js
656 ms
sortable.min.js
630 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
644 ms
wp-mediaelement.js
626 ms
media-views.min.js
728 ms
media-editor.min.js
598 ms
media-audiovideo.min.js
571 ms
thickbox.js
569 ms
wp-embed.min.js
578 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
578 ms
www-widgetapi.js
61 ms
mybodytypemakeover-logo.png
79 ms
BodyMakeoverHeader.jpg
432 ms
Venessa.jpg
351 ms
Tricia-Adams.jpg
409 ms
Tonia.jpg
349 ms
Temo-Reyes.jpg
433 ms
Tashanna-Coburn.jpg
467 ms
Stacy-Burroughs.jpg
596 ms
Robin-Stiffler.jpg
657 ms
Alisa-Daglio.png
470 ms
Kris-Reid.png
556 ms
Roberta-Kerner.jpg
742 ms
Patricia-Rue.jpg
713 ms
Nikki-Cohen.jpg
714 ms
Michelle-Foster.jpg
1424 ms
Michelle-Carter.jpg
778 ms
Meredith-Wright.jpg
926 ms
Martha-Gutierrez.jpg
937 ms
Marsha-Reino.jpg
926 ms
Maggie.jpg
1016 ms
Maggie-Parker.jpg
1008 ms
Lynne-Gray.jpg
1162 ms
Liz-Matheny.jpg
1142 ms
Leticia-Reyes.jpg
1159 ms
Laura-Williams.jpg
1233 ms
David-Louy.jpg
1226 ms
Carol-Westberg.jpg
1308 ms
Bell-Schellback.jpg
1350 ms
Carol-Smith.jpg
1376 ms
Art-Cordts.jpg
1367 ms
GR.jpg
1367 ms
Dana-Adams.jpg
1460 ms
u-WUoqrET9fUeobQW7jkRaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
23 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTdqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
24 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNStqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
24 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzNqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
23 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-htqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
24 ms
ETmodules_v2_4.ttf
1400 ms
loadingAnimation.gif
1179 ms
bg_direction_nav.png
1133 ms
bodymakeovers.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
bodymakeovers.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
bodymakeovers.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Page is blocked from indexing
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bodymakeovers.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Bodymakeovers.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
bodymakeovers.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Body Makeover S. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: