Tools & Wizards About Us
bodyproject.us screenshot

Report Summary

  • 19

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    36% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 47% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 82

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    44% of websites

bodyproject.us

Home - Body Project - Alexander Technique - San Francisco - Berkeley

Page Load Speed

2 sec in total

First Response

49 ms

Resources Loaded

1.7 sec

Page Rendered

245 ms

bodyproject.us screenshot

About Website

Visit bodyproject.us now to see the best up-to-date Body Project content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about bodyproject.us

Providing experienced Alexander Technique lessons and classes in San Francisco and Berkeley. Find out more about Alexander Technique with Elyse Shafarman.

Visit bodyproject.us

Key Findings

We analyzed Bodyproject.us page load time and found that the first response time was 49 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

bodyproject.us performance score

19

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value9.0 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.3 s

5/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,520 ms

13/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.01

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value26.4 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

bodyproject.us

49 ms

www.bodyproject.us

522 ms

sdk.js

28 ms

css

61 ms

flick.css

96 ms

Our browser made a total of 66 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (53 requests) were addressed to the original Bodyproject.us, 3% (2 requests) were made to Connect.facebook.net and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (522 ms) belongs to the original domain Bodyproject.us.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.4 MB (70%)

Content Size

2.0 MB

After Optimization

604.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Bodyproject.us main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 89.1 kB

  • Original 110.3 kB
  • After minification 107.9 kB
  • After compression 21.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 89.1 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-34%

Potential reduce by 67.6 kB

  • Original 198.8 kB
  • After minification 131.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Body Project needs image optimization as it can save up to 67.6 kB or 34% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 743.4 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB
  • After compression 368.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 743.4 kB or 67% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 501.6 kB

  • Original 585.8 kB
  • After minification 497.6 kB
  • After compression 84.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bodyproject.us needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 501.6 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 47 (78%)

Requests Now

60

After Optimization

13

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 60 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Body Project. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

bodyproject.us

bodyproject.us

49 ms

www.bodyproject.us

www.bodyproject.us

522 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

28 ms

css

css

61 ms

flick.css

flick.css

96 ms

353 ms

fbstyle.css

fbstyle.css

90 ms

css

css

95 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

57 ms

ffwd_frontend.css

ffwd_frontend.css

89 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

111 ms

jquery.mCustomScrollbar.css

jquery.mCustomScrollbar.css

94 ms

grid.css

grid.css

93 ms

base.css

base.css

95 ms

layout.css

layout.css

123 ms

shortcodes.css

shortcodes.css

153 ms

magnific-popup.css

magnific-popup.css

108 ms

mediaelementplayer.css

mediaelementplayer.css

117 ms

enfold.css

enfold.css

162 ms

custom.css

custom.css

127 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

170 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

135 ms

scrollTo.js

scrollTo.js

140 ms

jquery.form.min.js

jquery.form.min.js

149 ms

mailchimp.js

mailchimp.js

158 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

169 ms

datepicker.js

datepicker.js

177 ms

st_insights.js

st_insights.js

27 ms

ffwd_frontend.js

ffwd_frontend.js

192 ms

jquery.mobile.js

jquery.mobile.js

174 ms

jquery.mCustomScrollbar.concat.min.js

jquery.mCustomScrollbar.concat.min.js

175 ms

jquery.fullscreen-0.4.1.js

jquery.fullscreen-0.4.1.js

179 ms

ffwd_gallery_box.js

ffwd_gallery_box.js

190 ms

avia-compat.js

avia-compat.js

188 ms

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

205 ms

mediaelement-migrate.min.js

mediaelement-migrate.min.js

195 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

8 ms

embed.js

embed.js

68 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

173 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

wp-mediaelement.min.css

175 ms

ssba.js

ssba.js

178 ms

avia.js

avia.js

202 ms

shortcodes.js

shortcodes.js

196 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

189 ms

js

js

147 ms

js

js

107 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.js

wp-mediaelement.min.js

189 ms

87 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

136 ms

vimeo.min.js

vimeo.min.js

145 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

141 ms

logobg.png

logobg.png

48 ms

Studio-in-the-Mission-morning-light-300x201.jpg

Studio-in-the-Mission-morning-light-300x201.jpg

49 ms

p6.jpg

p6.jpg

49 ms

p5.jpg

p5.jpg

49 ms

p4.jpg

p4.jpg

49 ms

ajax_loader.png

ajax_loader.png

47 ms

Top-50-Badge.png

Top-50-Badge.png

50 ms

H4coBX6Mmc_Z4SP-8Q.woff

H4coBX6Mmc_Z4SP-8Q.woff

35 ms

u-4X0qWljRw-PfU81xCKCpdpbgZJl6XFpfEd7eA9BIxxkV2EH7alwQ.woff

u-4X0qWljRw-PfU81xCKCpdpbgZJl6XFpfEd7eA9BIxxkV2EH7alwQ.woff

190 ms

entypo-fontello.woff

entypo-fontello.woff

27 ms

time_gray.png

time_gray.png

29 ms

share_gray.png

share_gray.png

31 ms

comment_gray.png

comment_gray.png

31 ms

52486631_10155765551556736_1675773316935188480_n.jpg

52486631_10155765551556736_1675773316935188480_n.jpg

25 ms

print.css

print.css

43 ms

Accessibility Review

bodyproject.us accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

bodyproject.us best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

bodyproject.us SEO score

82

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bodyproject.us can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Bodyproject.us main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

bodyproject.us

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Body Project. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: