3.8 sec in total
227 ms
3.2 sec
322 ms
Click here to check amazing Bon content for Germany. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about bon.de
Spezialklinik, Arztpraxis oder Optiker? Wir sind Partner auf Augenhöhe! Wir beraten zu ophthalmologischen Geräten und Einrichtungen.
Visit bon.deWe analyzed Bon.de page load time and found that the first response time was 227 ms and then it took 3.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
bon.de performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.1 s
21/100
10%
Value7.3 s
5/100
25%
Value6.7 s
36/100
10%
Value960 ms
29/100
30%
Value0.033
100/100
15%
Value14.9 s
8/100
10%
227 ms
485 ms
578 ms
268 ms
268 ms
Our browser made a total of 68 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 96% of them (65 requests) were addressed to the original Bon.de, 3% (2 requests) were made to Code.etracker.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Etracker.de. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Bon.de.
Page size can be reduced by 140.3 kB (10%)
1.3 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Bon.de main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 852.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 126.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 126.7 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Bon images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 4.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 3.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bon.de has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 51 (81%)
63
12
The browser has sent 63 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bon. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 37 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
bon.de
227 ms
bon.de
485 ms
tooltipster.bundle.min.css
578 ms
tooltipster-sideTip-light.min.css
268 ms
jquery.material.form.css
268 ms
intlTelInput.min.css
270 ms
styles.css
272 ms
styles.css
276 ms
styles.css
356 ms
woocommerce-layout.css
354 ms
woocommerce.css
357 ms
style.min.css
356 ms
slick.min.css
360 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.css
443 ms
style.css
736 ms
borlabs-cookie_1_de.css
445 ms
js_composer.min.css
635 ms
jquery.min.js
999 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
530 ms
cookie.js
533 ms
ee-head.js
618 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
622 ms
woocommerce.min.js
663 ms
slick.min.js
1058 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.js
801 ms
stickit.js
722 ms
custom.js
755 ms
borlabs-cookie-prioritize.min.js
731 ms
e.js
531 ms
lazyload.min.js
740 ms
core.min.js
768 ms
datepicker.min.js
809 ms
tooltipster.bundle.min.js
820 ms
jquery.material.form.min.js
828 ms
intlTelInput-jquery.min.js
861 ms
dialog_trigger.js
899 ms
ninjapopups.min.js
910 ms
index.js
927 ms
index.js
954 ms
ee-footer.js
863 ms
site_main.js
858 ms
awdr-dynamic-price.js
859 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
853 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
870 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
885 ms
hooks.min.js
811 ms
i18n.min.js
822 ms
wc-blocks-google-analytics.js
825 ms
actions.js
823 ms
cart_widget.min.js
784 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
806 ms
borlabs-cookie.min.js
736 ms
search.svg
180 ms
t.js
115 ms
Montserrat-Regular.ttf
328 ms
Montserrat-Medium.ttf
379 ms
Montserrat-Bold.ttf
643 ms
bon_Logo_RGB.svg
213 ms
Bon-Logo.svg
226 ms
Startbild_Pupille_kl.jpg
578 ms
borlabs-cookie-icon-dynamic.svg
303 ms
Bild-fAr-Startseite-Glaukom.png
1192 ms
3D-Map-fAr-Kategorie-Hornhaut-und-Startseite-Neuheiten-Hornhaut.png
295 ms
Bild-fAr-Startseite-Retina.jpg
501 ms
Einrichtung.jpg
285 ms
Refraktion_und_Sehpr_fung_1.jpg
378 ms
cntcc
421 ms
woocommerce-smallscreen.css
95 ms
bon.de accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
bon.de best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
bon.de SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
DE
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bon.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Bon.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
bon.de
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Bon. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: