8.9 sec in total
441 ms
8 sec
472 ms
Welcome to bongard.net homepage info - get ready to check Bongard best content right away, or after learning these important things about bongard.net
Digital-Agentur für KMU: WordPress-Webseiten, Online-Shops, eCommerce, Google Ads und SEO ✓ 20 Jahre Erfahrung, Google-Partner
Visit bongard.netWe analyzed Bongard.net page load time and found that the first response time was 441 ms and then it took 8.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
bongard.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.8 s
11/100
10%
Value9.3 s
1/100
25%
Value7.3 s
29/100
10%
Value400 ms
68/100
30%
Value0.003
100/100
15%
Value9.5 s
30/100
10%
441 ms
1058 ms
686 ms
102 ms
219 ms
Our browser made a total of 44 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Bongard.net, 86% (38 requests) were made to Resonanz-digital.at and 5% (2 requests) were made to Webcache-eu.datareporter.eu. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (5.8 sec) relates to the external source Resonanz-digital.at.
Page size can be reduced by 208.0 kB (14%)
1.5 MB
1.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Bongard.net main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 737.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 87.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 87.7 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Bongard images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 67.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 67.9 kB or 15% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 52.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bongard.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 52.4 kB or 29% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (68%)
22
7
The browser has sent 22 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bongard. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
bongard.net
441 ms
www.resonanz-marketing.com
1058 ms
resonanz-digital.at
686 ms
style.min.css
102 ms
banner.css
219 ms
styles.css
199 ms
avia-merged-styles-cde0c6c51261fc92978c8d72b8f0d1b3.css
493 ms
post-20.css
364 ms
style.0bf77c0d.css
713 ms
jquery.min.js
1268 ms
avia-head-scripts-d73a0d4e3379767a508e1451e323f2e8.js
492 ms
platform.js
26 ms
proseal.js
74 ms
underscore.min.js
558 ms
banner.js
254 ms
runtime.75600a8b.js
633 ms
main.09533980.js
593 ms
dotlottie-player.js
5582 ms
avia-footer-scripts-587d1fef9988c9a6c71d6e3e0593813e.js
5819 ms
lazyload.min.js
693 ms
bg_nav.434bb02c.jpg
99 ms
diagonale-small-gradient-248-249-250.7d5454c7.svg
178 ms
bg_resonanz-scaled.df498d23.jpg
2285 ms
kundenstory_oekostrom_bg3-scaled.jpeg
1447 ms
diagonale-small-gradient-248-249-250-reverse.8483bbba.svg
197 ms
poppins-semibold.ttf
2027 ms
poppins-bold.ttf
312 ms
poppins-extrabold.ttf
415 ms
poppins-black.ttf
525 ms
poppins-medium.ttf
628 ms
poppins-regular.ttf
732 ms
poppins-light.ttf
836 ms
poppins-extralight.ttf
941 ms
poppins-thin.ttf
1042 ms
entypo-fontello.woff
1142 ms
poppins-italic.ttf
1247 ms
poppins-mediumitalic.ttf
1352 ms
poppins-lightitalic.ttf
1459 ms
poppins-extralightitalic.ttf
1524 ms
poppins-thinitalic.ttf
1561 ms
poppins-semibolditalic.ttf
1683 ms
poppins-bolditalic.ttf
1667 ms
poppins-extrabolditalic.ttf
1771 ms
poppins-blackitalic.ttf
1837 ms
bongard.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0
bongard.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
bongard.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
DE
DE
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bongard.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Bongard.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
bongard.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Bongard. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: