Tools & Wizards About Us
bonitaetspruefung.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 65

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    79% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 48% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 95

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    91% of websites

bonitaetspruefung.net

Bonitätsprüfung - Informationsservice für Bonität und Scoring

Page Load Speed

36 sec in total

First Response

426 ms

Resources Loaded

35.1 sec

Page Rendered

420 ms

bonitaetspruefung.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to bonitaetspruefung.net homepage info - get ready to check Bonitaetspruefung best content right away, or after learning these important things about bonitaetspruefung.net

Unabhängige Auskunft zu Bonität und Kreditwürdigkeit. FAQ zu Score Rating bei Kredit und Finanzierung. Kostenlose Informationen und Tipps.

Visit bonitaetspruefung.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Bonitaetspruefung.net page load time and found that the first response time was 426 ms and then it took 35.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there was 1 request timeout, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.

Performance Metrics

bonitaetspruefung.net performance score

65

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

20/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.0 s

28/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.6 s

54/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value170 ms

93/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.003

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.2 s

75/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

bonitaetspruefung.net

426 ms

www.bonitaetspruefung.net

2358 ms

main.css

879 ms

bootstrap.css

427 ms

additional.css

292 ms

Our browser made a total of 39 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 33% of them (13 requests) were addressed to the original Bonitaetspruefung.net, 28% (11 requests) were made to Ecx.images-amazon.com and 15% (6 requests) were made to Logos.affili.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20.5 sec) relates to the external source Ads.domainorganizer.de.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 137.4 kB (46%)

Content Size

296.2 kB

After Optimization

158.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Bonitaetspruefung.net main page is 296.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 100.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 20.3 kB

  • Original 26.7 kB
  • After minification 25.4 kB
  • After compression 6.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 20.3 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 830 B

  • Original 78.9 kB
  • After minification 78.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Bonitaetspruefung images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-34%

Potential reduce by 31.0 kB

  • Original 90.3 kB
  • After minification 80.0 kB
  • After compression 59.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 31.0 kB or 34% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 85.3 kB

  • Original 100.1 kB
  • After minification 81.1 kB
  • After compression 14.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bonitaetspruefung.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 85.3 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (25%)

Requests Now

36

After Optimization

27

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 36 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bonitaetspruefung. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

bonitaetspruefung.net

bonitaetspruefung.net

426 ms

www.bonitaetspruefung.net

www.bonitaetspruefung.net

2358 ms

main.css

main.css

879 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

427 ms

additional.css

additional.css

292 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

148 ms

base64.js

base64.js

295 ms

bootstrap-transition.js

bootstrap-transition.js

158 ms

bootstrap-dropdown.js

bootstrap-dropdown.js

293 ms

bootstrap-tooltip.js

bootstrap-tooltip.js

305 ms

bootstrap-popover.js

bootstrap-popover.js

309 ms

bootstrap-scrollspy.js

bootstrap-scrollspy.js

433 ms

general.js

general.js

434 ms

counter.js

counter.js

356 ms

41HJW585c0L._SL160_.jpg

41HJW585c0L._SL160_.jpg

176 ms

lg.php

lg.php

504 ms

2180.gif

2180.gif

465 ms

2182.gif

2182.gif

457 ms

1682.gif

1682.gif

456 ms

1152.gif

1152.gif

455 ms

1675.gif

1675.gif

455 ms

1434.gif

1434.gif

458 ms

impressum.png

impressum.png

271 ms

41ZUtZGpd9L._SL160_.jpg

41ZUtZGpd9L._SL160_.jpg

500 ms

41ezG%2BCHFKL._SL160_.jpg

41ezG%2BCHFKL._SL160_.jpg

143 ms

41KcdFAbsHL._SL160_.jpg

41KcdFAbsHL._SL160_.jpg

139 ms

517DXT4d2HL._SL160_.jpg

517DXT4d2HL._SL160_.jpg

258 ms

51bHP7dHXFL._SL160_.jpg

51bHP7dHXFL._SL160_.jpg

149 ms

31S2SX91YnL._SL160_.jpg

31S2SX91YnL._SL160_.jpg

155 ms

51V19Hv2hzL._SL160_.jpg

51V19Hv2hzL._SL160_.jpg

248 ms

415m%2BqAoO9L._SL160_.jpg

415m%2BqAoO9L._SL160_.jpg

226 ms

51votKY88TL._SL160_.jpg

51votKY88TL._SL160_.jpg

246 ms

cm

cm

304 ms

getAds.php

getAds.php

20505 ms

288 ms

VXD-257-House-728x90-DE.jpg

VXD-257-House-728x90-DE.jpg

204 ms

t.php

t.php

200 ms

piwik.js

piwik.js

639 ms

piwik.php

piwik.php

228 ms

Accessibility Review

bonitaetspruefung.net accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

bonitaetspruefung.net best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

bonitaetspruefung.net SEO score

95

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bonitaetspruefung.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Bonitaetspruefung.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

bonitaetspruefung.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Bonitaetspruefung. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: