Tools & Wizards About Us
botanicalfloraldesign.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 46

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    65% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

botanicalfloraldesign.com

Botanical Floral Design | Wedding Florist

Page Load Speed

1 sec in total

First Response

128 ms

Resources Loaded

820 ms

Page Rendered

53 ms

botanicalfloraldesign.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to botanicalfloraldesign.com homepage info - get ready to check Botanical Floral Design best content right away, or after learning these important things about botanicalfloraldesign.com

Botanical Floral Design ~ Locally owned and operated Kansas City Metro Wedding Florist Design! We are your Experts in Wedding Floral & Event Floral!

Visit botanicalfloraldesign.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Botanicalfloraldesign.com page load time and found that the first response time was 128 ms and then it took 873 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

botanicalfloraldesign.com performance score

46

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

61/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

46/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.1 s

79/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,500 ms

14/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.9 s

13/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.botanicalfloraldesign.com

128 ms

minified.js

27 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

59 ms

polyfill.min.js

56 ms

thunderbolt-commons.b70ee867.bundle.min.js

92 ms

Our browser made a total of 41 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Botanicalfloraldesign.com, 32% (13 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 29% (12 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (466 ms) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 770.8 kB (61%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

483.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Botanicalfloraldesign.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 668.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 539.5 kB

  • Original 668.8 kB
  • After minification 667.2 kB
  • After compression 129.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 539.5 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-48%

Potential reduce by 88.7 kB

  • Original 186.7 kB
  • After minification 98.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Botanical Floral Design needs image optimization as it can save up to 88.7 kB or 48% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-36%

Potential reduce by 142.5 kB

  • Original 398.9 kB
  • After minification 398.9 kB
  • After compression 256.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 142.5 kB or 36% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (25%)

Requests Now

40

After Optimization

30

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 40 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Botanical Floral Design. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.botanicalfloraldesign.com

www.botanicalfloraldesign.com

128 ms

minified.js

minified.js

27 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

focus-within-polyfill.js

59 ms

polyfill.min.js

polyfill.min.js

56 ms

thunderbolt-commons.b70ee867.bundle.min.js

thunderbolt-commons.b70ee867.bundle.min.js

92 ms

main.317ed945.bundle.min.js

main.317ed945.bundle.min.js

92 ms

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

104 ms

lodash.min.js

lodash.min.js

103 ms

react.production.min.js

react.production.min.js

92 ms

react-dom.production.min.js

react-dom.production.min.js

104 ms

siteTags.bundle.min.js

siteTags.bundle.min.js

104 ms

90a168_d2d6802bd61241719a49e842dc01483d~mv2.jpg

90a168_d2d6802bd61241719a49e842dc01483d~mv2.jpg

212 ms

bundle.min.js

bundle.min.js

60 ms

90a168_57c9c4a6d68d4957adcca3abf9fd4987~mv2.png

90a168_57c9c4a6d68d4957adcca3abf9fd4987~mv2.png

144 ms

Screenshot_20201114-144203_Instagram.jpg

Screenshot_20201114-144203_Instagram.jpg

217 ms

06-2-19-5617.jpg

06-2-19-5617.jpg

257 ms

bow_2020_badges(70x70).png

bow_2020_badges(70x70).png

302 ms

90a168_3d270316ee5a4e2f8fb8910b6649c4a8~mv2.png

90a168_3d270316ee5a4e2f8fb8910b6649c4a8~mv2.png

176 ms

90a168_38b35d51fb02430eae11339b7d2b5771~mv2.png

90a168_38b35d51fb02430eae11339b7d2b5771~mv2.png

278 ms

0a2e17eb03fa4662b759578a9a3bd687.jpg

0a2e17eb03fa4662b759578a9a3bd687.jpg

273 ms

caad1f_a2c9f62610924b5a8371aa66463259dc.png

caad1f_a2c9f62610924b5a8371aa66463259dc.png

466 ms

8d13be_8145f7e1813f48b298e45e93aa98eef7.gif

8d13be_8145f7e1813f48b298e45e93aa98eef7.gif

220 ms

90a168_9cbca8938c5a41b1a8ef2740e0bb240b~mv2.jpg

90a168_9cbca8938c5a41b1a8ef2740e0bb240b~mv2.jpg

350 ms

278019192ae045d191a9430cf507c7f6.png

278019192ae045d191a9430cf507c7f6.png

259 ms

ironpatern.84ec58ff.png

ironpatern.84ec58ff.png

43 ms

110 ms

110 ms

108 ms

107 ms

104 ms

105 ms

128 ms

126 ms

121 ms

122 ms

121 ms

121 ms

deprecation-en.v5.html

deprecation-en.v5.html

8 ms

bolt-performance

bolt-performance

9 ms

deprecation-style.v5.css

deprecation-style.v5.css

7 ms

right-arrow.svg

right-arrow.svg

4 ms

Accessibility Review

botanicalfloraldesign.com accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

botanicalfloraldesign.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

botanicalfloraldesign.com SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Botanicalfloraldesign.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Botanicalfloraldesign.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

botanicalfloraldesign.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Botanical Floral Design. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: