Tools & Wizards About Us
braidlock.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 6

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    21% of other websites

  • 72

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 37% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

braidlock.com

Home | Braidlock Catheter Securement | Securing Lifelines

Page Load Speed

9.1 sec in total

First Response

1.7 sec

Resources Loaded

6.9 sec

Page Rendered

496 ms

braidlock.com screenshot

About Website

Visit braidlock.com now to see the best up-to-date Braidlock content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about braidlock.com

Braidlock ® : A Revolutionary adjustable line-fixation device. Effective, efficient & easy, Braidlock reduces medical care costs, saving money, time & lives

Visit braidlock.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Braidlock.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.7 sec and then it took 7.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

braidlock.com performance score

6

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

21/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value23.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.9 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value4,850 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.386

27/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value19.4 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

braidlock.com

1732 ms

B6k_hZqsIEu2ohxMe23spD2UiKs.js

265 ms

style.min.css

298 ms

styles.css

283 ms

rgs.css

285 ms

Our browser made a total of 61 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 62% of them (38 requests) were addressed to the original Braidlock.com, 18% (11 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 7% (4 requests) were made to Jnn-pa.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Braidlock.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 771.9 kB (33%)

Content Size

2.4 MB

After Optimization

1.6 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Braidlock.com main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 90.4 kB

  • Original 109.3 kB
  • After minification 109.3 kB
  • After compression 18.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 90.4 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-18%

Potential reduce by 279.7 kB

  • Original 1.5 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Braidlock needs image optimization as it can save up to 279.7 kB or 18% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-29%

Potential reduce by 75.0 kB

  • Original 257.5 kB
  • After minification 257.5 kB
  • After compression 182.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 75.0 kB or 29% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 326.8 kB

  • Original 479.6 kB
  • After minification 477.2 kB
  • After compression 152.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Braidlock.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 326.8 kB or 68% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (65%)

Requests Now

46

After Optimization

16

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Braidlock. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

braidlock.com

braidlock.com

1732 ms

B6k_hZqsIEu2ohxMe23spD2UiKs.js

B6k_hZqsIEu2ohxMe23spD2UiKs.js

265 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

298 ms

styles.css

styles.css

283 ms

rgs.css

rgs.css

285 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

325 ms

style.css

style.css

336 ms

magnific.css

magnific.css

2415 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

602 ms

nectar-slider.css

nectar-slider.css

1779 ms

js_composer.min.css

js_composer.min.css

619 ms

style.css

style.css

793 ms

colorbox.min.css

colorbox.min.css

593 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

958 ms

modernizr.js

modernizr.js

853 ms

urchin.js

urchin.js

30 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

554 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

805 ms

magnific.js

magnific.js

1053 ms

superfish.js

superfish.js

1039 ms

init.js

init.js

1321 ms

nectar-slider.js

nectar-slider.js

1232 ms

touchswipe.min.js

touchswipe.min.js

1283 ms

jquery.colorbox.1.5.9-min.js

jquery.colorbox.1.5.9-min.js

1316 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

1488 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

1542 ms

v652eace1692a40cfa3763df669d7439c1639079717194

v652eace1692a40cfa3763df669d7439c1639079717194

100 ms

5Z87gPVuz1euJkrx-n4heDrC65k.js

5Z87gPVuz1euJkrx-n4heDrC65k.js

1425 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

236 ms

NM_OeRGb8vU

NM_OeRGb8vU

565 ms

vC18-F1QMGY

vC18-F1QMGY

557 ms

Braidlock-Logo-Website.png

Braidlock-Logo-Website.png

943 ms

crest_logo_white.png

crest_logo_white.png

941 ms

header.png

header.png

943 ms

OpenSans-Regular-webfont.woff

OpenSans-Regular-webfont.woff

839 ms

OpenSans-Light-webfont.woff

OpenSans-Light-webfont.woff

838 ms

OpenSans-Semibold-webfont.woff

OpenSans-Semibold-webfont.woff

839 ms

OpenSansBold-webfont.woff

OpenSansBold-webfont.woff

1377 ms

fontawesome-webfont.svg

fontawesome-webfont.svg

1372 ms

icomoon.woff

icomoon.woff

1308 ms

NM_OeRGb8vU

NM_OeRGb8vU

1 ms

vC18-F1QMGY

vC18-F1QMGY

1 ms

diagonal_line.png

diagonal_line.png

553 ms

braidlock.com

braidlock.com

1858 ms

NM_OeRGb8vU

NM_OeRGb8vU

181 ms

vC18-F1QMGY

vC18-F1QMGY

83 ms

www-player.css

www-player.css

132 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

123 ms

base.js

base.js

229 ms

fetch-polyfill.js

fetch-polyfill.js

121 ms

ad_status.js

ad_status.js

383 ms

Y-zeT9jJ33tCNYTX0Kw8-3I-ogsAM9wZgys9W8554e8.js

Y-zeT9jJ33tCNYTX0Kw8-3I-ogsAM9wZgys9W8554e8.js

285 ms

embed.js

embed.js

121 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

504 ms

id

id

88 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

143 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

147 ms

Create

Create

124 ms

Create

Create

155 ms

GenerateIT

GenerateIT

14 ms

GenerateIT

GenerateIT

19 ms

Accessibility Review

braidlock.com accessibility score

72

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

braidlock.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

braidlock.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Braidlock.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Braidlock.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

braidlock.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Braidlock. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: