3.2 sec in total
480 ms
2.3 sec
413 ms
Click here to check amazing Brand Base content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about brand-base.com
We are the come back company. We create high impact promotional campaigns. We make people think again, feel again, and buy again.
Visit brand-base.comWe analyzed Brand-base.com page load time and found that the first response time was 480 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
brand-base.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.6 s
62/100
10%
Value4.8 s
30/100
25%
Value5.3 s
58/100
10%
Value270 ms
82/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value5.7 s
68/100
10%
480 ms
91 ms
186 ms
286 ms
289 ms
Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (52 requests) were addressed to the original Brand-base.com, 7% (4 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (809 ms) belongs to the original domain Brand-base.com.
Page size can be reduced by 139.5 kB (7%)
2.0 MB
1.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Brand-base.com main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 98.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 98.6 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 36.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Brand Base images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 3.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Brand-base.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (80%)
51
10
The browser has sent 51 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Brand Base. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
brand-base.com
480 ms
sdm_wp_styles.css
91 ms
style.min.css
186 ms
style.min.css
286 ms
astra-addon-65081021331561-85941415.css
289 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
289 ms
swiper.min.css
363 ms
post-24.css
365 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
369 ms
uael-frontend.min.css
373 ms
global.css
371 ms
post-5.css
381 ms
style.css
451 ms
ecs-style.css
454 ms
post-56.css
457 ms
post-350.css
461 ms
jquery.min.js
469 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
467 ms
sdm_wp_scripts.js
539 ms
ecs_ajax_pagination.js
542 ms
ecs.js
545 ms
widget-posts.min.css
582 ms
animations.min.css
582 ms
style.min.js
581 ms
astra-addon-6508102133c0c8-19058175.js
626 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
629 ms
TweenMax.min.js
23 ms
ScrollMagic.min.js
40 ms
animation.gsap.js
40 ms
debug.addIndicators.min.js
38 ms
main.js
640 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
643 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
642 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
726 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
715 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
717 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
809 ms
hooks.min.js
727 ms
i18n.min.js
727 ms
frontend.min.js
802 ms
waypoints.min.js
804 ms
core.min.js
746 ms
frontend.min.js
651 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
550 ms
080620_BB_website_home_hero.jpg
612 ms
arrow-right-white.svg
347 ms
coffee-hero-img__001.jpg
615 ms
Darth_Vader-scaled.jpg
734 ms
spatialvision-hero-img__001-copy.jpg
734 ms
home_culture_img_001.png
624 ms
BNO-Lid_zwart.svg
436 ms
BB-ecovadis.png
527 ms
Gotham-Book.woff
761 ms
Gotham-Bold.woff
700 ms
Gotham-Black.woff
670 ms
fhronaldson-r-webfont.woff
727 ms
brand-base.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
brand-base.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
brand-base.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Brand-base.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Brand-base.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
brand-base.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Brand Base. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: