Tools & Wizards About Us
brandchirp.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

brandchirp.com

BrandChirp | Twitter Marketing | Social Media Marketing

Page Load Speed

1.8 sec in total

First Response

434 ms

Resources Loaded

1.3 sec

Page Rendered

129 ms

brandchirp.com screenshot

About Website

Visit brandchirp.com now to see the best up-to-date Brand Chirp content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about brandchirp.com

Visit brandchirp.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Brandchirp.com page load time and found that the first response time was 434 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

brandchirp.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

brandchirp.com

434 ms

css_207a73e0e39db935aee06633b6265176.css

242 ms

css_50a3f4b8aaa8fc0ac692f4304bf60d4f.css

128 ms

js_0a08e744fc33d87b891d629c97c8ceeb.js

371 ms

follow_us_on_twitter.png

497 ms

Our browser made a total of 27 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (25 requests) were addressed to the original Brandchirp.com, 7% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (497 ms) belongs to the original domain Brandchirp.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 108.1 kB (39%)

Content Size

277.0 kB

After Optimization

169.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Brandchirp.com main page is 277.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 159.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 7.5 kB

  • Original 11.0 kB
  • After minification 9.7 kB
  • After compression 3.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 1.3 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 7.5 kB or 68% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-24%

Potential reduce by 38.3 kB

  • Original 159.8 kB
  • After minification 121.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Brand Chirp needs image optimization as it can save up to 38.3 kB or 24% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-52%

Potential reduce by 41.0 kB

  • Original 78.3 kB
  • After minification 64.9 kB
  • After compression 37.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 41.0 kB or 52% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 21.3 kB

  • Original 27.9 kB
  • After minification 27.3 kB
  • After compression 6.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Brandchirp.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 21.3 kB or 76% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (31%)

Requests Now

26

After Optimization

18

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 26 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Brand Chirp. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

brandchirp.com

brandchirp.com

434 ms

css_207a73e0e39db935aee06633b6265176.css

css_207a73e0e39db935aee06633b6265176.css

242 ms

css_50a3f4b8aaa8fc0ac692f4304bf60d4f.css

css_50a3f4b8aaa8fc0ac692f4304bf60d4f.css

128 ms

js_0a08e744fc33d87b891d629c97c8ceeb.js

js_0a08e744fc33d87b891d629c97c8ceeb.js

371 ms

follow_us_on_twitter.png

follow_us_on_twitter.png

497 ms

bg-top-tile.gif

bg-top-tile.gif

75 ms

bg-top.png

bg-top.png

127 ms

logo.png

logo.png

125 ms

bg-slider-bot.png

bg-slider-bot.png

74 ms

slider-arrow-left.png

slider-arrow-left.png

125 ms

slider-arrow-right.png

slider-arrow-right.png

126 ms

sign_up_button.png

sign_up_button.png

128 ms

take_a_tour.png

take_a_tour.png

128 ms

flashtweet_graphic.png

flashtweet_graphic.png

309 ms

bg-main-top.gif

bg-main-top.gif

187 ms

brand_watch_icon.png

brand_watch_icon.png

290 ms

tweet_stats_icon.png

tweet_stats_icon.png

187 ms

rss_icon.png

rss_icon.png

189 ms

target_follow_icon.png

target_follow_icon.png

189 ms

multiple_twitter_icon.png

multiple_twitter_icon.png

308 ms

schedule_tweet_icon.png

schedule_tweet_icon.png

249 ms

who_uses_brandchirp.png

who_uses_brandchirp.png

311 ms

bg-footer-top.gif

bg-footer-top.gif

250 ms

footer-bevel.gif

footer-bevel.gif

311 ms

hr-footer.png

hr-footer.png

312 ms

ga.js

ga.js

32 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

12 ms

SEO Factors

brandchirp.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Brandchirp.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Brandchirp.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

brandchirp.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Brand Chirp. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: