3.4 sec in total
362 ms
2.5 sec
536 ms
Welcome to brandingmonitor.pl homepage info - get ready to check Branding Monitor best content for Poland right away, or after learning these important things about brandingmonitor.pl
Branding newsy Zobacz wszystkie newsy Reklama Wydarzenia i informacje Pressroom
Visit brandingmonitor.plWe analyzed Brandingmonitor.pl page load time and found that the first response time was 362 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
brandingmonitor.pl performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.6 s
33/100
10%
Value9.0 s
1/100
25%
Value9.2 s
13/100
10%
Value2,210 ms
6/100
30%
Value0.093
91/100
15%
Value16.4 s
5/100
10%
362 ms
581 ms
221 ms
39 ms
224 ms
Our browser made a total of 79 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 70% of them (55 requests) were addressed to the original Brandingmonitor.pl, 23% (18 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Brandingmonitor.pl.
Page size can be reduced by 271.9 kB (13%)
2.1 MB
1.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Brandingmonitor.pl main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 141.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 141.6 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 99.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Branding Monitor images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 27.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 27.7 kB or 12% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Brandingmonitor.pl has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 40 (70%)
57
17
The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Branding Monitor. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
brandingmonitor.pl
362 ms
brandingmonitor.pl
581 ms
main.min.css
221 ms
css
39 ms
style.css
224 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
225 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
448 ms
swiper.min.css
334 ms
post-7828.css
335 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
335 ms
global.css
343 ms
post-7908.css
346 ms
post-7899.css
455 ms
post-7897.css
444 ms
css
43 ms
fontawesome.min.css
452 ms
brands.min.css
456 ms
js
59 ms
js
106 ms
adsbygoogle.js
168 ms
widget-theme-elements.min.css
530 ms
widget-nav-menu.min.css
565 ms
widget-posts.min.css
567 ms
solid.min.css
565 ms
frontend.min.js
579 ms
jquery.min.js
703 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
638 ms
jquery.sticky.min.js
668 ms
jquery.smartmenus.min.js
670 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
669 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
699 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
715 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
886 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
776 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
777 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
783 ms
hooks.min.js
806 ms
i18n.min.js
812 ms
frontend.min.js
888 ms
waypoints.min.js
889 ms
core.min.js
896 ms
frontend.min.js
923 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
928 ms
gtm.js
72 ms
branding-monitor-logo.png
543 ms
cbs-europa-rebranding-film-cafe-nowe-logo.jpg
759 ms
develos-aplikacje.jpg
652 ms
cortland-rebranding-ispot-nowe-logo-salonow.jpg
658 ms
przestrzen-sklepu-kreowanie-marki.jpg
693 ms
nowe-logo-napoli-rebranding-2024.jpg
816 ms
malow-rebranding-2024-nowe-logo.jpg
762 ms
rebranding-ald-automotive-leaseplan-nowe-logo-ayvens-2024.jpg
873 ms
pfleiderer-rebranding-woodeco-nowa-marka-logo-2024.jpg
879 ms
konkurs-logo-balonowe-mistrzostwa-swiata-2026.jpg
1036 ms
konkurs-plakat-lot-2024.jpg
980 ms
konkurs-pr-wings-2024.jpg
982 ms
zarobki-grafik-projektant-raport-rynkowy-grafmag-2024.jpg
980 ms
grafconf-2024-wydarzenie-zapowiedz.jpg
1025 ms
va9E4kDNxMZdWfMOD5VvmYjN.woff
95 ms
va9E4kDNxMZdWfMOD5Vvl4jN.woff
115 ms
va9B4kDNxMZdWfMOD5VnZKveSBf8.woff
126 ms
va9B4kDNxMZdWfMOD5VnPKreSBf8.woff
126 ms
va9B4kDNxMZdWfMOD5VnWKneSBf8.woff
127 ms
va9C4kDNxMZdWfMOD5Vn9LjHYTQ.woff
127 ms
va9B4kDNxMZdWfMOD5VnSKzeSBf8.woff
126 ms
va9B4kDNxMZdWfMOD5VnLK3eSBf8.woff
124 ms
va9B4kDNxMZdWfMOD5VnLK3eRhf8.woff
128 ms
va9B4kDNxMZdWfMOD5VnMK7eSBf8.woff
154 ms
va9B4kDNxMZdWfMOD5VnFK_eSBf8.woff
156 ms
super-krak-konkurs-nowe-logo.jpg
1008 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
922 ms
neIXzD-0qpwxpaWvjeD0X88SAOeasc8btSKqwg.woff
50 ms
neIXzD-0qpwxpaWvjeD0X88SAOeasc8btSyqwg.woff
50 ms
neIXzD-0qpwxpaWvjeD0X88SAOeasfcZtSKqwg.woff
51 ms
neIXzD-0qpwxpaWvjeD0X88SAOeasasatSKqwg.woff
51 ms
neIQzD-0qpwxpaWvjeD0X88SAOeauXo-pg.woff
52 ms
neIXzD-0qpwxpaWvjeD0X88SAOeasd8ctSKqwg.woff
52 ms
neIXzD-0qpwxpaWvjeD0X88SAOeasbsftSKqwg.woff
52 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
906 ms
brandingmonitor.pl accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
brandingmonitor.pl best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
brandingmonitor.pl SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
PL
PL
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Brandingmonitor.pl can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Polish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Brandingmonitor.pl main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
brandingmonitor.pl
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Branding Monitor. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: