8.4 sec in total
465 ms
6.1 sec
1.9 sec
Click here to check amazing Brandmarkmarketing content for Pakistan. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about brandmarkmarketing.com
Visit brandmarkmarketing.comWe analyzed Brandmarkmarketing.com page load time and found that the first response time was 465 ms and then it took 7.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
brandmarkmarketing.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.4 s
71/100
10%
Value6.2 s
11/100
25%
Value19.0 s
0/100
10%
Value530 ms
55/100
30%
Value0.012
100/100
15%
Value42.7 s
0/100
10%
465 ms
295 ms
324 ms
418 ms
465 ms
Our browser made a total of 83 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 77% of them (64 requests) were addressed to the original Brandmarkmarketing.com, 22% (18 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Brandmarkmarketing.com.
Page size can be reduced by 89.9 kB (1%)
15.5 MB
15.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Brandmarkmarketing.com main page is 15.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 15.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 88.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 88.8 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 450 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Brandmarkmarketing images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 222 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 448 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Brandmarkmarketing.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (56%)
64
28
The browser has sent 64 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Brandmarkmarketing. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
brandmarkmarketing.com
465 ms
style.min.css
295 ms
theme.min.css
324 ms
header-footer.min.css
418 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
465 ms
post-8.css
413 ms
frontend.min.css
419 ms
swiper.min.css
517 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
644 ms
global.css
657 ms
post-21.css
690 ms
post-12.css
712 ms
post-153.css
716 ms
joinchat.min.css
859 ms
css
32 ms
jquery.min.js
861 ms
widget-nav-menu.min.css
1010 ms
widget-icon-list.min.css
996 ms
email-decode.min.js
712 ms
e-gallery.min.css
1045 ms
hello-frontend.min.js
1007 ms
qr-creator.min.js
1215 ms
joinchat.min.js
1170 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1261 ms
jquery.smartmenus.min.js
1324 ms
e-gallery.min.js
1339 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
1051 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
1338 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
1487 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
1506 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
1522 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
1782 ms
hooks.min.js
1696 ms
i18n.min.js
1355 ms
frontend.min.js
1368 ms
waypoints.min.js
1381 ms
core.min.js
1690 ms
frontend.min.js
1766 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
1508 ms
brandmark-logo-footer-1.png
933 ms
Artboard-1@4x-100-768x768.jpg
1962 ms
Artboard-2@4x-100-768x767.jpg
1738 ms
Artboard-3@4x-100-768x767.jpg
1801 ms
Artboard-4@4x-100-768x767.jpg
1838 ms
Artboard-5@4x-100-768x767.jpg
1861 ms
Artboard-6@4x-100-768x767.jpg
1780 ms
Artboard-7@4x-100-768x767.jpg
2877 ms
Artboard-8@4x-100-768x768.jpg
2809 ms
Artboard-9@4x-100-768x767.jpg
2791 ms
Artboard-10@4x-100-768x767.jpg
2582 ms
Artboard-11@4x-100-768x767.jpg
2899 ms
Artboard-12@4x-100-768x767.jpg
1974 ms
Artboard-13@4x-100-768x767.jpg
2781 ms
Artboard-14@4x-100-768x767.jpg
3538 ms
Artboard-15@4x-100-768x768.jpg
3710 ms
Artboard-16@4x-100-768x767.jpg
3598 ms
Artboard-17@4x-100-768x767.jpg
3652 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEw.woff
23 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEw.woff
23 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1xlEw.woff
30 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z1xlEw.woff
32 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEw.woff
31 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedA.woff
31 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEw.woff
29 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_Z1xlEw.woff
30 ms
pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTucHtG.woff
32 ms
pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLm111VF9eI.woff
32 ms
pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLm81xVF9eI.woff
32 ms
pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmy15VF9eI.woff
33 ms
pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmr19VF9eI.woff
33 ms
font
55 ms
font
53 ms
pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLm21lVF9eI.woff
53 ms
pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmv1pVF9eI.woff
53 ms
pxiAyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmE0tCMPQ.woff
54 ms
Artboard-18@4x-100-768x767.jpg
3615 ms
Artboard-19@4x-100-768x767.jpg
3361 ms
Artboard-20@4x-100-768x767.jpg
4341 ms
Artboard-21@4x-100-768x767.jpg
3926 ms
Artboard-22@4x-100-768x768.jpg
4237 ms
Artboard-23@4x-100-768x767.jpg
4152 ms
Artboard-24@4x-100-768x767.jpg
4159 ms
Artboard-25@4x-100-768x767.jpg
3373 ms
brandmarkmarketing.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
brandmarkmarketing.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
brandmarkmarketing.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Page is blocked from indexing
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Brandmarkmarketing.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Brandmarkmarketing.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
brandmarkmarketing.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Brandmarkmarketing. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: