1.3 sec in total
64 ms
878 ms
312 ms
Click here to check amazing Brands Reviews content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about brands-reviews.com
Brands-Reviews.com - Read Professional And Honest Reviews About Online Marketing Brands - If you're interested in Youtube views or Instagram followers, start here!
Visit brands-reviews.comWe analyzed Brands-reviews.com page load time and found that the first response time was 64 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
brands-reviews.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.6 s
13/100
10%
Value8.7 s
1/100
25%
Value5.7 s
51/100
10%
Value970 ms
28/100
30%
Value0.34
33/100
15%
Value7.3 s
50/100
10%
64 ms
31 ms
31 ms
39 ms
37 ms
Our browser made a total of 83 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (70 requests) were addressed to the original Brands-reviews.com, 7% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Use.fontawesome.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (365 ms) relates to the external source Use.fontawesome.com.
Page size can be reduced by 124.4 kB (11%)
1.1 MB
975.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Brands-reviews.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 667.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 60.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 11.7 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 60.6 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 47.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Brands Reviews images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 7.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 8.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Brands-reviews.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 46 (64%)
72
26
The browser has sent 72 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Brands Reviews. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 23 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
brands-reviews.com
64 ms
css
31 ms
bootstrap.min.css
31 ms
font-awesome.min.css
39 ms
animate.min.css
37 ms
simple-line-icons.min.css
47 ms
owl.carousel.min.css
42 ms
owl.theme.default.min.css
41 ms
magnific-popup.min.css
49 ms
settings.css
58 ms
layers.css
60 ms
navigation.css
55 ms
component.css
65 ms
theme.css
71 ms
theme-elements.css
86 ms
theme-blog.css
79 ms
theme-shop.css
85 ms
default.css
79 ms
modernizr.min.js
126 ms
jquery.min.js
117 ms
jquery.appear.min.js
98 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
98 ms
jquery-cookie.min.js
144 ms
bootstrap.min.js
103 ms
common.min.js
118 ms
jquery.validation.min.js
120 ms
jquery.easy-pie-chart.min.js
142 ms
jquery.gmap.min.js
151 ms
jquery.lazyload.min.js
152 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
152 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
155 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
158 ms
vide.min.js
160 ms
jquery.barrating.js
196 ms
theme.js
169 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
164 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
184 ms
all.css
154 ms
js
59 ms
fontawesome-stars.css
168 ms
css-stars.css
149 ms
bootstrap-stars.css
151 ms
fontawesome-stars-o.css
154 ms
custom.css
153 ms
jquery.flipshow.min.js
186 ms
view.home.js
181 ms
theme.init.js
179 ms
brands-reviews-logo.png
60 ms
head_new.jpg
63 ms
home-concept-pin.png
62 ms
home-concept-icons.png
60 ms
validation.png
61 ms
prices.png
60 ms
performance.png
64 ms
earning-money.jpg
65 ms
getfans.png
64 ms
9758.png
63 ms
kccatl.png
66 ms
subpals.png
64 ms
buildmyviews.png
68 ms
viral-kick.png
69 ms
nologo.jpg
68 ms
buyviews.png
86 ms
qq-tube.png
139 ms
youtubebulkviews.png
314 ms
appsally.png
140 ms
logo-1.png
138 ms
logo-3.png
138 ms
logo-4.png
140 ms
logo-6.png
313 ms
casinologo2.png
313 ms
font
76 ms
font
76 ms
font
248 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVQ.woff
249 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVQ.woff
250 ms
UqyNK9UOIntux_czAvDQx_ZcHqZXBNQzdcD_.woff
249 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
288 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
365 ms
js
58 ms
analytics.js
54 ms
revicons.woff
100 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
101 ms
brands-reviews.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
brands-reviews.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
brands-reviews.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Brands-reviews.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Brands-reviews.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
brands-reviews.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Brands Reviews. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: