Tools & Wizards About Us
brandsiteselect.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 15

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    27% of other websites

  • 73

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 38% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

brandsiteselect.com

Brand Site Select - Hotel Site Selection, Board Meetings, Conferences, Sales Meetings, Vendors

Page Load Speed

1.3 sec in total

First Response

86 ms

Resources Loaded

719 ms

Page Rendered

506 ms

brandsiteselect.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to brandsiteselect.com homepage info - get ready to check Brand Site Select best content right away, or after learning these important things about brandsiteselect.com

Brand Site Select will help with hotel site selection for your next retreat, events, product launches, sales meetings, executive board meetings, conferences

Visit brandsiteselect.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Brandsiteselect.com page load time and found that the first response time was 86 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

brandsiteselect.com performance score

15

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value17.4 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value22.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value36.3 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,550 ms

13/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.163

72/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value25.7 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

brandsiteselect.com

86 ms

www.brandsiteselect.com

109 ms

styles.css

17 ms

css

40 ms

jquery.min.js

34 ms

Our browser made a total of 35 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 74% of them (26 requests) were addressed to the original Brandsiteselect.com, 14% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (184 ms) relates to the external source Googletagmanager.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 142.2 kB (9%)

Content Size

1.6 MB

After Optimization

1.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Brandsiteselect.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 140.1 kB

  • Original 170.6 kB
  • After minification 168.6 kB
  • After compression 30.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 140.1 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 1.0 MB
  • After minification 1.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Brand Site Select images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.9 kB

  • Original 361.9 kB
  • After minification 361.9 kB
  • After compression 360.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 139 B

  • Original 15.8 kB
  • After minification 15.8 kB
  • After compression 15.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Brandsiteselect.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (56%)

Requests Now

27

After Optimization

12

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 27 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Brand Site Select. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

brandsiteselect.com

brandsiteselect.com

86 ms

www.brandsiteselect.com

www.brandsiteselect.com

109 ms

styles.css

styles.css

17 ms

css

css

40 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

34 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

29 ms

nfpluginsettings.js

nfpluginsettings.js

23 ms

js

js

184 ms

index.js

index.js

21 ms

index.js

index.js

71 ms

scripts.min.js

scripts.min.js

73 ms

jquery.mobile.js

jquery.mobile.js

31 ms

magnific-popup.js

magnific-popup.js

36 ms

common.js

common.js

71 ms

api.js

api.js

102 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

101 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

101 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

101 ms

index.js

index.js

105 ms

logo-brand-site-select.png

logo-brand-site-select.png

146 ms

executive-hotel-room.jpg

executive-hotel-room.jpg

147 ms

meeting-planner.jpg

meeting-planner.jpg

117 ms

open-air-meeting.jpg

open-air-meeting.jpg

148 ms

genuine-business-partnerships.jpg

genuine-business-partnerships.jpg

174 ms

we-save-you-money.jpg

we-save-you-money.jpg

147 ms

save-you-time.jpg

save-you-time.jpg

168 ms

ITAN-Logo-1002.png

ITAN-Logo-1002.png

167 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHjxAwWw.ttf

S6uyw4BMUTPHjxAwWw.ttf

146 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwaPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwaPHA.ttf

160 ms

S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AUi-v.ttf

S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AUi-v.ttf

168 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwaPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwaPHA.ttf

172 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwaPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwaPHA.ttf

172 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

139 ms

modules.woff

modules.woff

179 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

18 ms

Accessibility Review

brandsiteselect.com accessibility score

73

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

brandsiteselect.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

brandsiteselect.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Brandsiteselect.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Brandsiteselect.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

brandsiteselect.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Brand Site Select. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: