4.2 sec in total
616 ms
2.3 sec
1.3 sec
Click here to check amazing Brand Surgical content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about brandsurgical.com
Brand Surgical Institute is a freestanding, state-of-the-art outpatient surgical facility dedicated to a broad range of surgical procedures focusing on health, weight loss, and beauty.
Visit brandsurgical.comWe analyzed Brandsurgical.com page load time and found that the first response time was 616 ms and then it took 3.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
brandsurgical.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
41/100
10%
Value6.8 s
7/100
25%
Value7.8 s
23/100
10%
Value1,780 ms
10/100
30%
Value0.014
100/100
15%
Value13.6 s
11/100
10%
616 ms
56 ms
110 ms
164 ms
162 ms
Our browser made a total of 94 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (81 requests) were addressed to the original Brandsurgical.com, 7% (7 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net and 2% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (757 ms) belongs to the original domain Brandsurgical.com.
Page size can be reduced by 255.3 kB (5%)
5.0 MB
4.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Brandsurgical.com main page is 5.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 219.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 219.8 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 21.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Brand Surgical images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 12.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 1.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Brandsurgical.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 43 (51%)
85
42
The browser has sent 85 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Brand Surgical. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
brandsurgical.com
616 ms
classic-themes.min.css
56 ms
styles.css
110 ms
font-awesome.min.css
164 ms
grid-system.css
162 ms
style.css
168 ms
header-layout-centered-menu.css
160 ms
header-secondary-nav.css
166 ms
element-tabbed-section.css
178 ms
css
34 ms
responsive.css
219 ms
flickity.css
216 ms
skin-material.css
221 ms
menu-dynamic.css
223 ms
js_composer.min.css
223 ms
salient-dynamic-styles.css
231 ms
bre6byg.css
28 ms
js
64 ms
animate.min.css
318 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
317 ms
core.css
316 ms
simple-dropdown.css
316 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
317 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
318 ms
index.js
460 ms
jquery.min.js
462 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
460 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
461 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
460 ms
priority.js
462 ms
transit.min.js
462 ms
waypoints.js
463 ms
imagesLoaded.min.js
462 ms
hoverintent.min.js
463 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.js
463 ms
anime.min.js
464 ms
flickity.min.js
465 ms
superfish.js
464 ms
init.js
696 ms
api.js
37 ms
touchswipe.min.js
464 ms
p.css
21 ms
index.js
421 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
383 ms
gtm.js
75 ms
Brand-Surgical-Institute-logo.png
449 ms
home-box-07.jpg
550 ms
home-box-01.jpg
551 ms
home-box-07-d.jpg
732 ms
home-box-01-c.jpg
550 ms
Brand-Surgical-Institute-brushed-gold-transparent-background.png
733 ms
ypo-logo.png
548 ms
home-box-06-b.jpg
670 ms
home-box-17.jpg
669 ms
home-box-09-c.jpg
671 ms
home-background-01.jpg
671 ms
dr-daniel-alison-photo.jpg
670 ms
dr-hermoz-ayvazian-photo.jpg
668 ms
dr-david-eldringhoff-ph.jpg
757 ms
dr-azadeh-farin-photo-new.jpg
756 ms
dr-sergey-lyass-photo.jpg
669 ms
dr-hooman-melamed-photo.jpg
669 ms
dr-trong-nguyen-photo.jpg
670 ms
dr-omar-rahman-ph.jpg
527 ms
dr-babak-samimi-ph.jpg
611 ms
dr-moosi-salibian-photo-new.jpg
613 ms
dr-berkay-unal-ph.jpg
612 ms
home-box-02-c.jpg
611 ms
dr-arash-yousefi-photo.jpg
611 ms
dr-michael-abdulian-ph-new.jpg
671 ms
home-background-02-c.jpg
672 ms
home-box-06-d.jpg
669 ms
home-box-04-a.jpg
669 ms
home-box-16.jpg
669 ms
home-box-03-a.jpg
669 ms
home-background-07-a.jpg
688 ms
home-background-04.jpg
687 ms
home-box-24.jpg
691 ms
d
127 ms
d
225 ms
d
226 ms
d
313 ms
d
314 ms
d
314 ms
fontawesome-webfont.svg
737 ms
icomoon.woff
555 ms
home-box-25.jpg
496 ms
home-box-08-d.jpg
495 ms
recaptcha__en.js
222 ms
home-background-06.jpg
407 ms
quote-2.png
240 ms
quote-01.png
299 ms
nav-box-01.jpg
299 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
56 ms
brandsurgical.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
brandsurgical.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
brandsurgical.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Brandsurgical.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Brandsurgical.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
brandsurgical.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Brand Surgical. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: